paulpressey25 wrote:This thread needs some Epicurious.
You didn't send the bat signal.
Terry Stotts sucks!
There.
Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis
paulpressey25 wrote:This thread needs some Epicurious.
crkone wrote:Since the Boston game, I'm worried any team with talent will be able to have a historic night from behind the 3 point line. I'm not too worried about the offense being stifled by anything but missed shots/TOs.
steger_3434 wrote:crkone wrote:Since the Boston game, I'm worried any team with talent will be able to have a historic night from behind the 3 point line. I'm not too worried about the offense being stifled by anything but missed shots/TOs.
Talented teams like Indiana, Toronto, Charlotte, philly?
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:crkone wrote:Since the Boston game, I'm worried any team with talent will be able to have a historic night from behind the 3 point line. I'm not too worried about the offense being stifled by anything but missed shots/TOs.
thats all pretty much dependent on the opposing center not being al horford. a 2 way threat on the block and from the line.
I think in the future if bigs are killing us from 3 we'll make the change to switching defense earlier than we did that night. remember once we made that move we reeled them right back in. if that game had been 5 qtrs. we would have won by 10-15 imo
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Ron Swanson wrote:Boston laid the "groundwork" for beating them by coming up 1 make short of tying the all-time record for made 3's in a game. Sure, I guess.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
crkone wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Boston laid the "groundwork" for beating them by coming up 1 make short of tying the all-time record for made 3's in a game. Sure, I guess.
Honestly, this record doesn't mean squat anymore in today's NBA.
chonestown wrote:jschligs wrote:Ill-yasova wrote:You’ll be lucky to find a bar with the bartender actually knows who the Milwaukee Bucks are.
Best bet would be a bar with a bunch of TVs so they happen to have it on. I don’t know of any that are slanted towards Bucks. Try Hopcat
Hopcat gone. If you're going to the Kohl, I imagine the game would be on at either the Echo or Lucky's.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:I think huge shooting nights all thru the league are going to be the norm as more and more teams switch to buds style which is basically the only way to play successfully over a larger sample these days. you play the math... give up one thing and try to take away another. the only real adjustments are the in game ones just to shake up a look.
the switching system still gave up open 3's but obviously the rhytym is going to change. that's really all you do when you call time out during another teams run. the same guys come out but the mojo can change.
Ron Swanson wrote:crkone wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:Boston laid the "groundwork" for beating them by coming up 1 make short of tying the all-time record for made 3's in a game. Sure, I guess.
Honestly, this record doesn't mean squat anymore in today's NBA.
Ok, but those are still the games you're going to lose. Even Golden State, as a team, has never made 24 threes in a game. You're talking about the most outlier of outliers here. Might as well just say, "teams having historic offensive nights" is the blueprint to beating any defense, which yeah, of course.
GB_Packers wrote:Neee something to complain about when it’s been a nearly flawless start to the season. Some people are still adjusting to the reality that the Bucks are finally really damn good.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Shaffty wrote:You guys are all so worried about defending them.
But really how are they going to even remotely stop us on O?
who tf is checking Giannis?
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |