Taking the non-Bucks fans temperature on the deadline moves just for fun:
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6121229/2025/02/07/luka-doncic-lakers-mavericks-jimmy-butler-warriors-heat-nba-trade-deadline-the-bounce/Winners:
Kyle Kuzma: After toiling in Washington for years and recently deciding he was done playing Wizards basketball, he got moved to the Bucks (27-22). He’ll have a real chance to remind people he can be an excellent role player. The Bucks get a solid B here. 
https://www.bleacherreport.com/articles/10153831-biggest-winners-and-losers-from-2025-nba-trade-deadlineLoser: Milwaukee Bucks
The Bucks are ostensibly in the hunt for the 2025 championship. While it makes sense to want to get younger at Middleton's roster spot, Kyle Kuzma is 29. By NBA standards, he's no spring chicken. He's also nowhere near as reliable a shooter and passer as Middleton.
Trading a franchise legend should almost certainly require a better return, especially when that legend is still helpful.
This season, the Bucks are plus-7.4 points per 100 possessions when Giannis Antetokounmpo, Damian Lillard and Middleton were all on the floor. They're plus-4.0 when Giannis and Lillard play without Middleton.
Yahoo Sports:
Loser: Milwaukee Bucks
I get the argument for moving on from Khris Middleton and bringing in Kyle Kuzma. (Hell, I made it.) I’m just skeptical that leaning on Kuzma will get the Bucks where they hope to go.
Yes, you’d hope Kuzma will experience a revival at joining a proper team after muddling through by far the worst season of his career for the impoverished Wizards. It would have to be one hell of a bounce-back, though, considering we’re talking about somebody who’s shooting 42% from the field, 28% from 3-point land and 60% from the foul line with a barely positive assist-to-turnover ratio. (And it’s not like Kuz is exactly making up for it with his work as a defensive demon.)
I understand that years of injuries have limited Middleton, and that Giannis is the one who’s the prime mover. But if you’re not actually trying to put the most competitive roster you can around him right friggin’ now, then sacrificing someone who got you to the top of the mountain for tax savings feels … well, cheap. Unseemly.
Not putting The Ringer article link up here. You guys already know what conclusions those clowns are drawing from this. And it sure isn't about wondering whether Bobby Portis picks up his player option.