06/19 ESPN & DX.com Speculation

carmelbrownqueen · Post #861 » by **carmelbrownqueen** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:10 pm

wichmae wrote:
carmelbrownqueen wrote:
wichmae wrote:There was one floating this morning I heard that involved Kirk Hinrich. there I said one of them.
Okay.. Gotcha. I wouldn't be upset about getting Kirk, but I am guessing it's what you heard we would have to give up just to get him.

I'm almost tempted to ask you to email me regarding this because I heard some stuff but you sound as if you heard more.

Have PP or MD P.M. me your e-mail or AIM address.

Okay PP or MD.. you both know the drill, get it done!

LUKE23 · Post #862 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:10 pm

delete

mcfromage · Post #863 » by **mcfromage** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:13 pm

As you two PM, I'll speculate: Could it be 8 for Hinrich? If so then I'd hope we trade Mo to Portland for 13. Maybe Randolph slips to 13?

Hinrich would fit the mold re: the importance of the PG position that Hammond has stressed.... I guess...

carmelbrownqueen · Post #864 » by **carmelbrownqueen** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:13 pm

Are we allowed to post email addresses?

Post #865 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:16 pm

I put the odds at about 5% of Bogut being moved for Mayo or Beasley, simply because I'm not that lucky, but I'll continue to maintain that it makes the most sense of any move in this draft. Both Miami and Minnesota have their stars, they need to surround them with role players. Both teams have gaping holes at center.

The Bucks need a star and could get one at #2 or #3. Worry about the role players later.

Like I said, I don't envision it happening but a guy could hope.

wichmae · Post #866 » by **wichmae** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:16 pm

carmelbrownqueen wrote:Are we allowed to post email addresses?

Just post it then edit out your message once I get it. Luke you can delete yours.

Post #867 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:17 pm

mcfromage wrote:As you two PM, I'll speculate: Could it be 8 for Hinrich? If so then I'd hope we trade Mo to Portland for 13. Maybe Randolph slips to 13?

Hinrich would fit the mold re: the importance of the PG position that Hammond has stressed.... I guess...

That doesn't seem like the type of deal that would leave many disappointed.

Balls2TheWalls · Post #868 » by **Balls2TheWalls** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:18 pm

delete

carmelbrownqueen · Post #869 » by **carmelbrownqueen** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:19 pm

wichmae wrote:
carmelbrownqueen wrote:Are we allowed to post email addresses?

Just post it then edit out your message once I get it. Luke you can delete yours.

delete...

Let me know if I deleted it too soon.

wichmae · Post #870 » by **wichmae** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:20 pm

everyone delete your e-mails. I sent the message no more pls...

Kerb Hohl · Post #871 » by **Kerb Hohl** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:20 pm

I am starting to feel it is Hinrich for #8 and filler. Although I don't mind Kirk...I just don't like that deal really. I'd hope we would turn and deal Mo/CV for something that excites this town a little bit more than that.

fam3381 · Post #872 » by **fam3381** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:20 pm

Here's some video of Hammond yesterday. He says as of today it's most like we keep the pick and also alludes to the possibility of a player from the top six slipping and changing the Bucks plans. Worth a look:

http://www.sportsbubbler.com/DisplayTop ... picID=2003

LUKE23 · Post #873 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:23 pm

The only way I'd do #8 for Hinrich would be if they take on Simmons deal. Simmons/8 for Hinrich.

We'd then be set at PG with Hinrich/Sessions/Bell. Mo/CV/Mason's expiring can be turned into a starting SF and PF/C depth.

Balls2TheWalls · Post #874 » by **Balls2TheWalls** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:24 pm

There must be a deal for Mo in place if we are going to make a deal for Hinrich.

Kerb Hohl · Post #875 » by **Kerb Hohl** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:29 pm

LUKE23 wrote:The only way I'd do #8 for Hinrich would be if they take on Simmons deal. Simmons/8 for Hinrich.

We'd then be set at PG with Hinrich/Sessions/Bell. Mo/CV/Mason's expiring can be turned into a starting SF and PF/C depth.

I would rather try and make it work for Gadz to replace Simmons there. They don't really need Hinrich seeing as they basically have Rose.

I don't see us making any splash signings next year so Simmons' contract doesn't really affect us at this point and it becomes an asset as an expiring for us next year.

I also have some confidence that Simmons may make some improvements this year and return somewhat close to his old form.

Post #876 » by **ReasonablySober** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:30 pm

I'm fine with Hinrich, though I don't think he's necessarily the PG you want. All I've heard out of Chicago both in the media and online is that he just doesn't have playmaking ability.

As for a deal involving Mo, good luck with that BYC status.

xTitan · Post #877 » by **xTitan** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:37 pm

DrugBust wrote:
wichmae wrote:He's off air now but this probably is the same rumor that is going to make everyones draft night a disappointing one.

The only way everyone's draft night is a disappointment is if they simply decide to move the team to OK City. There are too many camps here for everyone to be pissed off.

Actually I believe there is a deal or 2 that could piss just about everyone off......and its real, damn real possibility.

Oh, you will be glad to know that you will be able to continue to rip Bogut for many many years to come.

Balls2TheWalls · Post #878 » by **Balls2TheWalls** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:38 pm

xTitan wrote:
Actually I believe there is a deal or 2 that could piss just about everyone off......and its real, damn real possibility.

Agreed.

xTitan · Post #879 » by **xTitan** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:39 pm

DrugBust wrote:I'm fine with Hinrich, though I don't think he's necessarily the PG you want. All I've heard out of Chicago both in the media and online is that he just doesn't have playmaking ability.

As for a deal involving Mo, good luck with that BYC status.

hmmmmmm what would you be willing to give up?

LUKE23 · Post #880 » by **LUKE23** » Wed Jun 25, 2008 4:40 pm

Personally, after Hinrich's 2007-08 season, I don't think we should have to give up a ton for him, and if we do, we are the ones getting ripped off. He's easily a better defender than Mo, but he's about equal as a distributor and Mo is a better scorer.

I like Hinrich/Sessions as a pairing, but if it destroys our overall depth and makes us lose the draft pick, no thanks.