Krispy Kreme wrote:The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%.
.539 but okay. I wish I could just add 4 to whatever I wanted. I'd be a lot more popular with the ladies.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Krispy Kreme wrote:The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Krispy Kreme wrote:I'm often embarrassed to be a fan of this team, but I'm often even more embarrassed to be a fan of this team when reading idiotic takes like some of the ones in this thread.
The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%. Get the **** out of here with this "Khris disappears in the playoffs" garbage.
trwi7 wrote:Krispy Kreme wrote:The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%.
.539 but okay. I wish I could just add 4 to whatever I wanted. I'd be a lot more popular with the ladies.
coolhandluke121 wrote:trwi7 wrote:Krispy Kreme wrote:The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%.
.539 but okay. I wish I could just add 4 to whatever I wanted. I'd be a lot more popular with the ladies.
I'm pretty sure he meant the last 3 playoffs. The numbers don't add up at all otherwise, but they seem right if you include Boston.
It makes sense to go back 3 years. He was a shell of himself coming off the hamstring injury in 2017 after it seemed likely he would miss the whole season, and he was a 23-year-old in the playoffs for the first time in 2015. I'm not suggesting those shouldn't count against his career numbers, but it seems obvious that the last 3 seasons are a much more accurate representation of his playoff ability, which is basically exactly the same as his regular season ability.
Krispy Kreme wrote:I'm often embarrassed to be a fan of this team, but I'm often even more embarrassed to be a fan of this team when reading idiotic takes like some of the ones in this thread.
The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%. Get the **** out of here with this "Khris disappears in the playoffs" garbage.
DavidDunn21 wrote:Just remember: Everyone looks good when they're hitting 75% of their 3s. Lol on everyone losing their minds after two regular season games. Go backwards through Khris' game logs in your head. He's a fundamentally streaky player. But of course these games are the new normal. That stuff every postseason is the outlier.
So what have we learned from his postseasons vs. regular seasons? If he's in shape (which he is right now but hasn't been in the past) there are two major parts of his arsenal that will get him numbers now but won't carry forward in the same way:
1. His general hunting for foul calls. Falling down on 3 pointers and mid-range pump fake jump into the defender calls. He gets a few of these in the playoffs, but not at nearly the same rate. In the playoffs you risk the opposition going the other way for a dunk if you don't really sell that stuff.
2. His lay-up and floater package. This really fell off the cliff against Miami because as we all know, Khris is a bad athlete. These finger rolls that are being released well below the rim in a well-spaced regular season game were getting blocked or bouncing off under playoff intensity. He simply doesn't have another athletic gear to shift into. If he's red-hot, great. If not, it's difficult for him to be effective.
3. His playmaking. Everything mentioned above along with his bad dribbling means that him leaving his feet to pass isn't a great idea over the course of a seven game series. He still has his height and length which is used well in making deep over the top post passes to a cutting Brook or Giannis, but Khris' playmaking is a bonus in the playoffs, not something to be relied on.
With all that being said, we're firmly in the poker game now because Jrue is just that good. We're getting all the leadership qualities we coveted in Chris Paul in a younger body. I'm pretty confident even whatever Giannis is going through right now Jrue will mitigate. It's telling that both he and Khris wanted the ball on that second to last play against Boston. Bledsoe knew better. So now we have all kinds of options at the end of games aside from throw the ball to Khris in the corner and watch him shoot after the buzzer. I also have full confidence that Holiday isn't afraid to overrule Bud if need be.
Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
trwi7 wrote:Krispy Kreme wrote:The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%.
.539 but okay. I wish I could just add 4 to whatever I wanted. I'd be a lot more popular with the ladies.
Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
blazza18 wrote:Krispy Kreme wrote:I'm often embarrassed to be a fan of this team, but I'm often even more embarrassed to be a fan of this team when reading idiotic takes like some of the ones in this thread.
The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%. Get the **** out of here with this "Khris disappears in the playoffs" garbage.
Are those numbers only right if the Toronto series didn't happen?
I think Khris' best game as a Buck is last years sole win against the mighty Heat where he missed like 18 shots? Wonder what his TS% was for that?
emunney wrote:blazza18 wrote:Krispy Kreme wrote:I'm often embarrassed to be a fan of this team, but I'm often even more embarrassed to be a fan of this team when reading idiotic takes like some of the ones in this thread.
The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%. Get the **** out of here with this "Khris disappears in the playoffs" garbage.
Are those numbers only right if the Toronto series didn't happen?
I think Khris' best game as a Buck is last years sole win against the mighty Heat where he missed like 18 shots? Wonder what his TS% was for that?
56.3
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
giannis and 1 wrote:trwi7 wrote:Krispy Kreme wrote:The last two postseasons Khris has averaged 20 ppg, 6 rpg and 4.6 apg with a TS of 58%.
.539 but okay. I wish I could just add 4 to whatever I wanted. I'd be a lot more popular with the ladies.
Ahhh, you're talking about your height, right?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
trwi7 wrote:giannis and 1 wrote:trwi7 wrote:
.539 but okay. I wish I could just add 4 to whatever I wanted. I'd be a lot more popular with the ladies.
Ahhh, you're talking about your height, right?
Talking millimeters to my dick.
DutchManDanFan wrote:trwi7 wrote:giannis and 1 wrote:Ahhh, you're talking about your height, right?
Talking millimeters to my dick.
A 50% increase?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
yannisk wrote:coolhandluke121 wrote:trwi7 wrote:
.539 but okay. I wish I could just add 4 to whatever I wanted. I'd be a lot more popular with the ladies.
I'm pretty sure he meant the last 3 playoffs. The numbers don't add up at all otherwise, but they seem right if you include Boston.
It makes sense to go back 3 years. He was a shell of himself coming off the hamstring injury in 2017 after it seemed likely he would miss the whole season, and he was a 23-year-old in the playoffs for the first time in 2015. I'm not suggesting those shouldn't count against his career numbers, but it seems obvious that the last 3 seasons are a much more accurate representation of his playoff ability, which is basically exactly the same as his regular season ability.
he was amazing against Boston 3years ago, bad against Toronto and mediocre against Heat. If we take the averages maybe Giannis was great in the playoffs after all, he had TS of 62% 57% 61% but who cares? it is what he did against Toronto and Heat that matters not what he did against the Pistons and Orlando.
Would you rather be right or the Bucks win a ring. Answer truthfullyDavidDunn21 wrote:Statistics are SO MUCH fun, aren't they?! It's almost like you can make them say anything you want them to say!
Here's a bit of clarity from my perspective, but feel free to use the numbers you feel more comfortable with.
Khris Middleton has played in the playoffs 5 years. In four of the five years he's shot 42% from the floor or less. Three of those years were sub .400. The outlier year was Boston. (and we didn't win that series). Figuring in the Prunty Boston year skews all Middleton stats beyond recognition. Pretending he's a rock solid 21/7/5 on great shooting is simply a lie, because as everyone should know by now:
KHRIS MIDDLETON IS A FUNDAMENTALLY STREAKY PLAYER
Last year in the playoffs he played 10 games. Five were against a bad Orlando team and five were against a very good Heat team.
4/12
1/8
7/17
7/19
7/16
12/24
6/15
7/16
12/28
8/25
Five wins. Five losses. A ton of bad turnovers. Because:
KHRIS MIDDLETON IS A FUNDAMENTALLY STREAKY PLAYER