All The Bucks wrote:emunney wrote:All The Bucks wrote:When the Bucks win the NBA Championship this year, then thankfully all this talk about not having a good enough second banana can go away for awhile. You don't ever hear me complaining because I already know how this season ends.
The rationalization for us winning will be that somebody else performed on the level of a true #2 for the playoffs. "See, we didn't win with Khris as our 2nd best player, player x eclipsed him." And I will be FINE WITH THAT.
Or option A - Khris is the Bucks clear second best player throughout the playoffs, right on through win #4 in the Finals.
I would love to have a exercise with anybody on the board. we go back for all 4 series of every nba champion and they make a list of the #1s and #2s on those team that have never had a bad series in any given championship year and I make a list the guys that won those championships but had a bad series during the runup. like for example has klay Thompson or kyrie irving or paul pierce or hell crissakes even kobe Bryant ever had a **** series? if they have is that then the new definition of not being a true #1 or #2?
I wonder whose list would be longer if we made some lists like that.
that all being said. khris was on absolute fire for 3 series in a row over two years before the Toronto series. if we get 3 out of 4 from here on out I think that would be just fine with me.