Would Smith add chemistry?

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
Posts: 2,358
And1: 489
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Would Smith add chemistry? 

Post#1 » by GoldenAntlers » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:03 pm

Hey Bucks fans,

I just learned about this site recently and have been reading many of your posts for the last couple of weeks. It seems like this is the only place where serious talk of the Bucks is going on, so first, I thank you all for that as I have learned much.

I have a varying degree of interest in Jennings/Ellis. As a fan, watching their dynamism is both exciting and frustrating. I know many of the members here would love to see either one or both of these players leave and I understand why, but I wonder, would Josh Smith in the starting line-up make them better team players or better players overall?

It is all heresy until tomorrow, but if the Bucks are looking to keep Ellis, Jennings, Sanders, (Henson), that means someone has to go, highly likely that someone (someones) would be Ilyasova and Dalembert. Honestly, I think both of these guys can go. Dalembert doesn't have much time left in the NBA and Ilyasova is too inconsistent for my taste (i know, you could flame me about jennings/ellis for the same comment. I do like how many charges he takes. :) )

Of course the major argument boils down to money and contracts ending this year.

As the above suggests, the starting line-up would be:


We'd still have Henson, Dunleavy, Udrih and Udoh coming off the bench. Not to mention Harris (who is worth holding on to.)

If this team were able to find chemistry I think they could make it into the 2nd round of playoffs, and with that momentum, who knows.

I guess to play Devil's advocate, I'm wondering if maybe Milwaukee's problem wasn't too much swag, but not enough? If you are going to swag, go all out, or you are left with a team that has an identity issue.
If this move passes, I have a feeling many of you will be surprised by the outcome of this team once playoffs hit. Then again, this deal could easily be the worst move the Bucks have made in years.

Trying to see the light. :)

Can anybody tell me the pros/cons of Josh Smith, (as well as why he would or wouldn't enhance team chemistry) as I haven't actually seen the Hawks play in a couple of years?

Long post, but thanks for your thoughts.

Go Bucks!
User avatar
Posts: 418
And1: 424
Joined: Sep 18, 2010

Re: Would Smith add chemistry? 

Post#2 » by Fed » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:05 pm

Maybe, maybe not. I think Smith would excel in the pick and roll.
Banned User
Posts: 858
And1: 101
Joined: Oct 04, 2012

Re: Would Smith add chemistry? 

Post#3 » by sneakerdust » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:05 pm

Sixth Man
Posts: 1,511
And1: 117
Joined: Jun 25, 2012
Location: With Barnes in Fishers car

Re: Would Smith add chemistry? 

Post#4 » by RandyBreuer » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:05 pm

didn't know the Bucks were at risk of repeat offending anything?..........other than $MUCHO SWAG$

no Smith would not add chemistry....but he would add $MUCHO SWAG$

Drugbust wrote
"Sorry if my opinion offended your delicate sensibilities"


Longest rotation in league?
User avatar
A Diddy2231
Posts: 3,732
And1: 106
Joined: Sep 28, 2007
Location: NEW BEEZY

Re: Would Smith add chemistry? 

Post#5 » by A Diddy2231 » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:06 pm

Real question is will this thread get locked or not?
Johnny wrote:You betrayed me! You're not good. You, you're just a chicken. Chip-chip-chip-chip-cheep-cheep.
User avatar
Posts: 17,740
And1: 2,951
Joined: Jun 05, 2006

Re: Would Smith add chemistry? 

Post#6 » by humanrefutation » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:07 pm

It'll get locked. IBTL!
User avatar
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 50,486
And1: 7,721
Joined: Oct 27, 2002

Re: Would Smith add chemistry? 

Post#7 » by paulpressey25 » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:08 pm

Welcome to the board!

Please jump into our existing Josh Smith trade thread.

In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter
User avatar
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,856
And1: 1,744
Joined: Feb 10, 2009

Re: Would Smith add chemistry? 

Post#8 » by JimmyTheKid » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:08 pm

Cue 500 different variations of this post:

"Smith would add SWAG!!!!"

followed by chuckles, giggles, and eventually guffaws...

Return to Milwaukee Bucks