Page 1 of 64
MCW traded for Tony Snell - Deal Done
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:20 am
by paulpressey25
More to come. Per Stein.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:21 am
by LittleRooster
Yes please
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:22 am
by ReasonablySober
Sure, whatever.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:22 am
by Magic Giannison
NO, **** SNELL, WTF NOOOOOOO
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:23 am
by Baddy Chuck
If that's his value.........

sure.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:24 am
by Badgerlander
Gross
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:26 am
by Badgerlander
So the tank is on then I guess
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:26 am
by ReasonablySober
Am I wrong in thinking the Bucks should be getting a pick in this deal? MCW is somehow much better than Snell.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:26 am
by tski1972
ROY fetches potential top 5 pick, Bucks turn it into Tony Snell.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:27 am
by Baddy Chuck
Badgerlander wrote:So the tank is on then I guess
Trading MCW is about the farthest thing from tanking we could realistically do.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:27 am
by VooDoo7
Can't expect much for MCW I guess. Well, except for the LAL 1st round pick.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:27 am
by LuessiT
Yeah there has to be a pick involved in this. Anything else makes no sense.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:28 am
by GimmeDat
Is MCW really that bad these days?
As for Snell, he's a bit younger, he's long and a capable 3/D guy, but he lacks aggression and can often go invisible on offense. He has stretches where you think he might break out, but after this long, I think most people have given up on him being a big time difference maker.
He's very capable depth though.
I guess the Bulls must be liking his potential, because we already have a bunch of capable PG's, and we could really do without another non-shooting one.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:29 am
by randy84
Isn't Snell injured?
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:29 am
by VooDoo7
LuessiT wrote:Yeah there has to be a pick involved in this. Anything else makes no sense.
I'm sure WE'LL be the ones adding a 2nd round pick.
See, Vasquez trade.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:29 am
by Baddy Chuck
GimmeDat wrote:Is MCW really that bad these days?
Worse.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:30 am
by trwi7
Do the Bulls have a future 2nd from the Lakers? I'd even include a protected 1st to get a future Lakers 2nd just for the lawlz.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:30 am
by Pachinko_
I'd take a bag of chips and half a beer for MCW
add some dip and I'll throw in Vaughn too
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:30 am
by Baddy Chuck
I could see us getting Jerian Grant out of the deal and Fotsis proclaiming himself king of the board.
Re: MCW for Tony Snell being discussed
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2016 3:30 am
by Badgerlander
ReasonablySober wrote:Am I wrong in thinking the Bucks should be getting a pick in this deal? MCW is somehow much better than Snell.
I was thinking the same thing.