Gianstoppable wrote:Gery on the Fan, says he was told ownership will let Zanik make moves and has the potential to fire Kidd
Hope to God this is true. I'll believe it when I see it.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Gianstoppable wrote:Gery on the Fan, says he was told ownership will let Zanik make moves and has the potential to fire Kidd
xTitan wrote:So take this for what it is worth, Woelfel just said that Zanik has negotiated that he has full control, can fire who he wants, including Kidd.....now Woelfel also said Kidd would remain the coach to start, but be on a very short leash.
John Henson wrote:This lady just asked me who I play for and I said the Milwaukee Bucks, she quickly replied “oh the highschool across the street?”
ReasonablySober wrote:If they're serious about Zanik, make him the POBO. Ainge in Boston, Ujiri in Toronto come to mind. I want someone in the FO with God-Power.
ReasonablySober wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:If they're serious about Zanik, make him the POBO. Ainge in Boston, Ujiri in Toronto come to mind. I want someone in the FO with God-Power.
Hell, this would be my #1 stipulation to taking the Milwaukee job, given the Who's Running What s*it-show it's been for literally decades.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
Baddy Chuck wrote:xTitan wrote:So take this for what it is worth, Woelfel just said that Zanik has negotiated that he has full control, can fire who he wants, including Kidd.....now Woelfel also said Kidd would remain the coach to start, but be on a very short leash.
So you're telling me in a matter of hours Zanik has negotiated something that was deemed impossible when ole Hambone was here?
crkone wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:If they're serious about Zanik, make him the POBO. Ainge in Boston, Ujiri in Toronto come to mind. I want someone in the FO with God-Power.
Hell, this would be my #1 stipulation to taking the Milwaukee job, given the Who's Running What s*it-show it's been for literally decades.
LED: Here take this millions of dollars.
GM candidate: No sirs I will not. I have dignity.
LED: LOL K.
Baddy Chuck wrote:xTitan wrote:So take this for what it is worth, Woelfel just said that Zanik has negotiated that he has full control, can fire who he wants, including Kidd.....now Woelfel also said Kidd would remain the coach to start, but be on a very short leash.
So you're telling me in a matter of hours Zanik has negotiated something that was deemed impossible when ole Hambone was here?
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
ReasonablySober wrote:crkone wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:
Hell, this would be my #1 stipulation to taking the Milwaukee job, given the Who's Running What s*it-show it's been for literally decades.
LED: Here take this millions of dollars.
GM candidate: No sirs I will not. I have dignity.
LED: LOL K.
You're acting like Zanik doesn't have options. It's not like he needs the Milwaukee job.
Code: Select all
o- - - \o __|
o/ /| vv`\
/| | |
| / \_ |
/ \ | |
/ | |
ReasonablySober wrote:I wonder if people realize how stupid it looks to non-Bucks fans when the discussion of Hammond's good vs bad moves come up. Firing him for a MLE or late round pick vs drafting Giannis or trading for Middleton or getting the ROY in the 2nd round.
worthlessBucks wrote:He could have said believing me and it still could have applied.
jschligs wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't know who the **** SupremeHustle is?
crkone wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:crkone wrote:
LED: Here take this millions of dollars.
GM candidate: No sirs I will not. I have dignity.
LED: LOL K.
You're acting like Zanik doesn't have options. It's not like he needs the Milwaukee job.
OK wait years to get one of the 30 openings while wasting years of earning potential because you passed open a job on weak principles. Sounds like a great life plan.
coolhandluke121 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:I wonder if people realize how stupid it looks to non-Bucks fans when the discussion of Hammond's good vs bad moves come up. Firing him for a MLE or late round pick vs drafting Giannis or trading for Middleton or getting the ROY in the 2nd round.
That's a good way to put it. Doubtful it works though.
ReasonablySober wrote:I wonder if people realize how stupid it looks to non-Bucks fans when the discussion of Hammond's good vs bad moves come up. Firing him for a MLE or late round pick vs drafting Giannis or trading for Middleton or getting the ROY in the 2nd round.
emunney wrote:Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters
THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
Nowak008 wrote:ReasonablySober wrote:I wonder if people realize how stupid it looks to non-Bucks fans when the discussion of Hammond's good vs bad moves come up. Firing him for a MLE or late round pick vs drafting Giannis or trading for Middleton or getting the ROY in the 2nd round.
How about when Hammond went all in on a win now team and we were the worst team in the league? Worse than 6ers team that was trying to lose every single game...and we beat them by 4 games. That was pretty epic badness by Hambone.
That to me is more significant than swinging for the fences with the Giannis pick, when you have built a complete crap of a roster and collection of assets in your 5th year with the team.