Craig_Hodges wrote:
Forgive me, but it hardly seems myopic to point out that the defense might not have been the problem on a night where the bucks managed 89 points. Similar to the Toronto series where the defense really didn’t bother me those final 3 games. What bothered me was scoring 102, 99 and 94 respectively.
What bothered me was losing. Defending the 3 better would have won the Bucks the series. You can't take that off the table just because you would have preferred to win by scoring more points, especially when they proved capable of playing even better defense when they switch more, which they'll hopefully do with Marvin and Giannis at PF and C, respectively.
The path to offensive improvement isn't easy. They just don't shoot very well. The question is not whether they should improve the offense or the defense. The question is which one they can improve more easily, regardless of which one is already their greater strength. I stand by what I said. It's myopic to dismiss any opportunities for defensive improvement just because they're already great on defense.
Wut we've got here is... faaailure... to communakate.