ImageImage

ATL - Season Resumes page 87

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
MartyConlonOnTheRun
RealGM
Posts: 24,767
And1: 11,018
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Section 212 - Raising havoc in Squad 6

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1481 » by MartyConlonOnTheRun » Wed May 20, 2020 11:56 pm

JayMKE wrote:What they're doing in European soccer seems like total overkill

What are they doing? Saw they had 6 positive cases even with it.

The playoffs are a risk (literally) 1 billion dollar endeavor. All it takes is for Giannis to test positive and the at-risk population (coach pop, diantoni, Vince, etc) and it all falls apart. Even if it's overkill on an individual basis, one person like Harden going to the strip club will f-it all up.
User avatar
MoreTrife
Head Coach
Posts: 6,446
And1: 2,359
Joined: Jun 14, 2014
     

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1482 » by MoreTrife » Thu May 21, 2020 12:03 am

Chuck Diesel wrote:
MoreTrife wrote:
Chuck Diesel wrote:
Still wise words



Just be quiet until we know one way or another. Can't wait for you to be wrong. If you're right, no one needs to hear about it every other day, especially in the clown way you are doing it.

EDIT: And just billowing smoke that there WILL be a season yet you're acting like you're some top secret insider who will be proven right. Your reason for all this talk of starting season is what...keep the country's hopes up? Like words sustain us but they'll pull the rug out at the last second so we have a few weeks of good vibe talks of starting?



Whether I’m wrong or not you can still suck my billowing insider smoke.


Nah bitch
Bucksfan28
General Manager
Posts: 8,115
And1: 4,918
Joined: Nov 15, 2009

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1483 » by Bucksfan28 » Thu May 21, 2020 12:13 am

DingleJerry wrote:
Bucksfan28 wrote:So youre telling me Michael 6-0 Jordan couldnt overcome a scottie pippen migraine? Bum.


wait, so it's more difficult to win if you don't have another top 5 player on your team. Hmm, seems that's a notch for LBJ then huh


Man if the warriors never signed KD, LBJ wouldve won three straight rings Im sure of it.
MoreTrife wrote:Love seeing two buffoons have a buffoon competition.
User avatar
jschligs
General Manager
Posts: 7,967
And1: 5,888
Joined: Jul 20, 2016
     

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1484 » by jschligs » Thu May 21, 2020 12:57 am

Bucksfan28 wrote:
DingleJerry wrote:
Bucksfan28 wrote:So youre telling me Michael 6-0 Jordan couldnt overcome a scottie pippen migraine? Bum.


wait, so it's more difficult to win if you don't have another top 5 player on your team. Hmm, seems that's a notch for LBJ then huh


Man if the warriors never signed KD, LBJ wouldve won three straight rings Im sure of it.



The concept of if KD has signed with OKC that summer, what would've happened the next 2 years would've been fun. Would OKC top GSW in the WCF (probably not), who would the Warriors have signed that off-season? Would Lebron and the Cavs been able to win one more? I don't know, fun **** to think about instead of the age old debate over MJ vs Lebron. An argument that will never be settled.
DingleJerry
RealGM
Posts: 13,558
And1: 8,126
Joined: Jul 09, 2015
       

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1485 » by DingleJerry » Thu May 21, 2020 1:03 am

Yea it's a heck of an alternate timeline if KD stays. You kind of get the dream even-ish teams of Cavs, GSW, OKC, Houston, Spurs. Them not rounding the cap really messed things up
Resident Lillard truther since 2015.
User avatar
tonyreyes123
Starter
Posts: 2,298
And1: 746
Joined: Nov 20, 2009
Location: Lower Eastside
   

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1486 » by tonyreyes123 » Thu May 21, 2020 1:39 am

DingleJerry wrote:Yea it's a heck of an alternate timeline if KD stays. You kind of get the dream even-ish teams of Cavs, GSW, OKC, Houston, Spurs. Them not rounding the cap really messed things up



That will always be the biggest bitch move in the history of the NBA, I think he'd have 0 rings rn if he never went to GS
Bucks tricked me into being a diehard in 2001, LeBron is the 2nd best player ever, and pizza is awesome.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,469
And1: 34,977
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1487 » by ReasonablySober » Thu May 21, 2020 1:44 am

Still will never get the animosity towards players who want to upgrade their situation.

You could stay in bum-f*ck OKC on a team with perpetual terrible teammate Russell Westbrook, or you could go to maybe the best market in the country, play in a system built around sharing the ball, and win rings.

Tough decision.
User avatar
Wonka
General Manager
Posts: 7,935
And1: 4,709
Joined: Aug 19, 2012
 

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1488 » by Wonka » Thu May 21, 2020 2:42 am

ReasonablySober wrote:Still will never get the animosity towards players who want to upgrade their situation.

You could stay in bum-f*ck OKC on a team with perpetual terrible teammate Russell Westbrook, or you could go to maybe the best market in the country, play in a system built around sharing the ball, and win rings.

Tough decision.


No one cares that he left OKC. At all. They care that he joined arguably the best team in NBA history after they had beaten his ass in the playoffs the year before. It would be like if Jordan joined the Bad Boy Pistons in his prime because getting over the hump was “too hard” for him.

Durant is soft and sensitive, and beyond that, he took the easiest way to a ring in NBA history. His legacy will forever be defined by that move. You’re entitled to your opinion of course, but you’re also leaving out valuable context. People don’t respect KD as a competitor for good reason.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,469
And1: 34,977
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1489 » by ReasonablySober » Thu May 21, 2020 2:47 am

Wonka wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:Still will never get the animosity towards players who want to upgrade their situation.

You could stay in bum-f*ck OKC on a team with perpetual terrible teammate Russell Westbrook, or you could go to maybe the best market in the country, play in a system built around sharing the ball, and win rings.

Tough decision.


No one cares that he left OKC. At all. They care that he joined arguably the best team in NBA history after they had beaten his ass in the playoffs the year before. It would be like if Jordan joined the Bad Boy Pistons in his prime because getting over the hump was “too hard” for him.

Durant is soft and sensitive, and beyond that, he took the easiest way to a ring in NBA history. His legacy will forever be defined by that move. You’re entitled to your opinion of course, but you’re also leaving out valuable context. No one respects KD as a competitor for good reason.


He didn't go from Chicago to Detroit. It wasn't like he was downgrading at all in his living situation. He went to the freakin' Bay. If you were ridiculously wealthy and had a choice in living where you wanted to, SF is gonna be right there at the top. Detroit is at the bottom.

Second, he wasn't going to a team that played ugly-ass basketball and won their games by mugging people. He went to the team playing the most aesthetically pleasing brand of ball ever. His game went from frustrating to easy.

Who wouldn't want that in their own life?
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 23,860
And1: 19,660
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1490 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu May 21, 2020 3:13 am

tonyreyes123 wrote:
DingleJerry wrote:Yea it's a heck of an alternate timeline if KD stays. You kind of get the dream even-ish teams of Cavs, GSW, OKC, Houston, Spurs. Them not rounding the cap really messed things up



That will always be the biggest bitch move in the history of the NBA, I think he'd have 0 rings rn if he never went to GS
If you don't think he would have won a ring had he not went there then shouldn't you consider it a smart move not a bitch one.

Personally I wish he hadn't went there because I like competitive playoffs but hey it's his life and he was a FA so I respect his right to do what he pleases with his career.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
Wonka
General Manager
Posts: 7,935
And1: 4,709
Joined: Aug 19, 2012
 

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1491 » by Wonka » Thu May 21, 2020 3:38 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
Wonka wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:Still will never get the animosity towards players who want to upgrade their situation.

You could stay in bum-f*ck OKC on a team with perpetual terrible teammate Russell Westbrook, or you could go to maybe the best market in the country, play in a system built around sharing the ball, and win rings.

Tough decision.


No one cares that he left OKC. At all. They care that he joined arguably the best team in NBA history after they had beaten his ass in the playoffs the year before. It would be like if Jordan joined the Bad Boy Pistons in his prime because getting over the hump was “too hard” for him.

Durant is soft and sensitive, and beyond that, he took the easiest way to a ring in NBA history. His legacy will forever be defined by that move. You’re entitled to your opinion of course, but you’re also leaving out valuable context. No one respects KD as a competitor for good reason.


He didn't go from Chicago to Detroit. It wasn't like he was downgrading at all in his living situation. He went to the freakin' Bay. If you were ridiculously wealthy and had a choice in living where you wanted to, SF is gonna be right there at the top. Detroit is at the bottom.

Second, he wasn't going to a team that played ugly-ass basketball and won their games by mugging people. He went to the team playing the most aesthetically pleasing brand of ball ever. His game went from frustrating to easy.

Who wouldn't want that in their own life?


Basketball fans don’t care about living situation as it relates to joining a team that just knocked you out of the playoffs in historically embarrassing fashion. Your argument that his game went from frustrating to easy doesn’t help his cause. That’s the main issue people have with him going to Golden State. Taking the easy way out. Getting the easy ring. I’m not saying I don’t see where he was coming from, but I am saying that it was a weak move for both the league and his own legacy.
User avatar
FlagsFlyForever
General Manager
Posts: 8,441
And1: 5,256
Joined: Feb 21, 2013

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1492 » by FlagsFlyForever » Thu May 21, 2020 4:13 am

Nobody was mad when Rodman joined Jordan's Bulls. Nobody discredits reigning MVP Moses Malone for joining the NBA Finalist 76ers. Nobody blinked an eye when perennial all star LaMarcus Aldridge joined the perennial contender Spurs a year after they eliminated his Blazers in the playoffs. Or when Ray Allen joined LeBron's Heat after they eliminated his Celtics. Nobody ever complained about the countless other similar Durant-like instances. Players don't get criticized for joining good teams or teams that beat them in the playoffs or teams that had the best record in the league. It doesn't happen except that one season with Durant. And of course nobody praised Durant for leaving a dream situation in Golden State to go to mediocre Brooklyn.

Let's just call the Kevin Durant hate what it is. Durant's signing made the Warriors the prohibitive favorite and fans didn't enjoy it. Durant is the easy scapegoat and the media ran with their narrative. People are actually mad at the players for refusing to smooth the salary cap when the massive TV deal kicked in which allowed one of the best teams in the league to sign one of the best players in the league. They hate the situation. They take their frustration out on Durant but this isn't about Durant. Durant signing with Golden State was the product of a very unique situation that couldn't happen any other season. Any player would've done the same thing in his shoes but he happened to be the best free agent that year.
Read on Twitter
ejn1214
Pro Prospect
Posts: 846
And1: 678
Joined: Mar 14, 2013

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1493 » by ejn1214 » Thu May 21, 2020 5:05 am

ElPeregrino wrote:Nobody was mad when Rodman joined Jordan's Bulls. Nobody discredits reigning MVP Moses Malone for joining the NBA Finalist 76ers. Nobody blinked an eye when perennial all star LaMarcus Aldridge joined the perennial contender Spurs a year after they eliminated his Blazers in the playoffs. Or when Ray Allen joined LeBron's Heat after they eliminated his Celtics. Nobody ever complained about the countless other similar Durant-like instances. Players don't get criticized for joining good teams or teams that beat them in the playoffs or teams that had the best record in the league. It doesn't happen except that one season with Durant. And of course nobody praised Durant for leaving a dream situation in Golden State to go to mediocre Brooklyn.

Let's just call the Kevin Durant hate what it is. Durant's signing made the Warriors the prohibitive favorite and fans didn't enjoy it. Durant is the easy scapegoat and the media ran with their narrative. People are actually mad at the players for refusing to smooth the salary cap when the massive TV deal kicked in which allowed one of the best teams in the league to sign one of the best players in the league. They hate the situation. They take their frustration out on Durant but this isn't about Durant. Durant signing with Golden State was the product of a very unique situation that couldn't happen any other season. Any player would've done the same thing in his shoes but he happened to be the best free agent that year.

I'm not old enough to know anything about Moses Malone, but everyone else you listed is not even a close comparison. Ray Allen was a role player at that point in his career (a great one), Rodman a great role player, and Aldridge a fringe all star. You comparing them to Durant, a top 3 player in the league at that point, seems kind of silly. Some of what you say I agree with in the second paragraph. I understand he is very sensitive and lashed out after people went after him, but he has done a lot for people to hate him other than going to GS. He seemed to be quiet in OKC, but once he started talking so much in GS he was super easy to hate.
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 53,344
And1: 26,562
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
       

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1494 » by blazza18 » Thu May 21, 2020 5:14 am

DingleJerry wrote:Yea it's a heck of an alternate timeline if KD stays. You kind of get the dream even-ish teams of Cavs, GSW, OKC, Houston, Spurs. Them not rounding the cap really messed things up


Sure Ethan Strauss mentioned on a podcast that the Warriors would've been able to get him regardless. Different team obviously but the Warriors were likely always gonna get him.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1495 » by Nowak008 » Thu May 21, 2020 5:49 am

ReasonablySober wrote:Still will never get the animosity towards players who want to upgrade their situation.

You could stay in bum-f*ck OKC on a team with perpetual terrible teammate Russell Westbrook, or you could go to maybe the best market in the country, play in a system built around sharing the ball, and win rings.

Tough decision.


That's the thing - he didn't upgrade his situation. Durant went to a spot that got him branded a coward - rightfully so.

With the cap space bump, Durant could have gone to any team in the league. He ended up picking the worst imaginable spot. A decision that was obviously terrible in the moment for everyone involved - Durant and the entire NBA.

Like people said in this thread, we were in a golden age of basketball, and Durant completely wrecked it.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1496 » by Nowak008 » Thu May 21, 2020 5:54 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
Who wouldn't want that in their own life?


Also - when you get to a certain point in your life... your life doesn't belong to you 100%. Take Obama for example. He could literally do anything he wants in the world... like I am sure he would love to own an NBA team...but he can't because he has responsibilities, a legacy to uphold, and has to be role model etc..

When you are a top 3 MVP NBA player you can't just wreck the league because you want to live in San Francisco. It's nonsense.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1497 » by Nowak008 » Thu May 21, 2020 5:56 am

blazza18 wrote:
DingleJerry wrote:Yea it's a heck of an alternate timeline if KD stays. You kind of get the dream even-ish teams of Cavs, GSW, OKC, Houston, Spurs. Them not rounding the cap really messed things up


Sure Ethan Strauss mentioned on a podcast that the Warriors would've been able to get him regardless. Different team obviously but the Warriors were likely always gonna get him.



Where did Strauss get this info from Joe Lacob? :roll:
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
RRyder823
General Manager
Posts: 8,131
And1: 4,159
Joined: May 06, 2014
   

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1498 » by RRyder823 » Thu May 21, 2020 6:09 am

Are people still pretending they don't understand why Durant got hate for going to GS?....... Sure you can not agree with it but acting like you don't understand the rationale for the hate is the equivalent of sticking your head in the sand

Sent from my SM-G975U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
rilamann
RealGM
Posts: 25,826
And1: 13,223
Joined: Jun 20, 2003
Location: Bobby!! Bobby!! Bobby!!
     

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1499 » by rilamann » Thu May 21, 2020 6:52 am

WeekapaugGroove wrote:Jordon.


:curse:
Giannis Antetokounmpo wrote:You're out here reffing like Marc Davis and ****
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 53,344
And1: 26,562
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
       

Re: ATL - Amick - League to lose $900 million in TV money if no playoffs pg. 69 

Post#1500 » by blazza18 » Thu May 21, 2020 7:07 am

Nowak008 wrote:
blazza18 wrote:
DingleJerry wrote:Yea it's a heck of an alternate timeline if KD stays. You kind of get the dream even-ish teams of Cavs, GSW, OKC, Houston, Spurs. Them not rounding the cap really messed things up


Sure Ethan Strauss mentioned on a podcast that the Warriors would've been able to get him regardless. Different team obviously but the Warriors were likely always gonna get him.



Where did Strauss get this info from Joe Lacob? :roll:


Hey, man. I started the west wing today. I like it so far.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks