Bernman wrote:What a comeback. Tightened the d & that shot from Davis reinforced he's special. Practically had to one-hand it.
Looked a little like Kawhi to end the sixers in game 7.
Just saying
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Bernman wrote:What a comeback. Tightened the d & that shot from Davis reinforced he's special. Practically had to one-hand it.
Diggr14 wrote:Soft. Move on.. forget they existed. That being said.. gotta fire Gard too. he is part of the problem.
buckboy wrote:jakecronus8 wrote:Gard does indeed deserve to lose his job over this. While i think it’s pretty crappy for the leaks to happen and feel for him as person, it’s clear hes not ripe for this if they want to take another step as a program. On top of that he’s never going to recruit even to the level of Bo. They can do better and should be looking to do so.
Wow.
It's a meatball party.
Bucksmaniac wrote:I'm sorry, but I'm starting to sour on Giannis
Diggr14 wrote:He could go top 5 with 2 good years under his belt though. Even if he is going top 25.. and he can make this kind of leap the next season. He could play himself into the top 5. When it comes to next contract time, or year two extensions... teams do care where you were drafted. That does add premium to how they view you and how they pay you. Most players dont come into the NBA and play at an all-star level. They pay potential, pedigree.. and part of it is what they have invested in you too.
midranger wrote:The refs had a really rough night. Glad it didn’t impact the outcome, but damn did Johnny get banged around all night. Also, that review out of bounds at the end. What’s the point of replay if you can’t get that one right?
I think he needs to show he can consistently produce and refine his skills a bit. He is an NBA athlete but not so much so that he'll be drafted in the first round strictly because of his measurables.MikeIsGood wrote:Apparently my hot take from a few weeks ago wasn't hot enough - I said he wouldn't play four years here, but yeah, as he's continued to play up to this level I could see him leaving after this season. If he's a first round pick, he should go (I mean, as long as he wants to).
Off the top of my head/not looking at a draft board, I don't think he's a top 5 candidate. He's been shooting well, but I'm guessing not prolific enough for scouts to want to consider a SG that high in today's game. I think they'd want to see him consistently shooting 4-6 per game, with range, to consider that. It's just way too critical of a skill right now.
Diggr14 wrote:He could go top 5 with 2 good years under his belt though. Even if he is going top 25.. and he can make this kind of leap the next season. He could play himself into the top 5. When it comes to next contract time, or year two extensions... teams do care where you were drafted. That does add premium to how they view you and how they pay you. Most players dont come into the NBA and play at an all-star level. They pay potential, pedigree.. and part of it is what they have invested in you too.
RiotPunch wrote:Johnny is #61 in HoopsHype's aggregate draft rankings (up 46 spots from the previous update). He's definitely played his way onto the NBA Draft radar. I doubt he leaves without a 1st round guarantee, which could well happen by season's end with the way he's playing.
emunney wrote:RiotPunch wrote:Johnny is #61 in HoopsHype's aggregate draft rankings (up 46 spots from the previous update). He's definitely played his way onto the NBA Draft radar. I doubt he leaves without a 1st round guarantee, which could well happen by season's end with the way he's playing.
No way in hell I'd let him get out of the 1st round. Would be nuts.
emunney wrote:RiotPunch wrote:Johnny is #61 in HoopsHype's aggregate draft rankings (up 46 spots from the previous update). He's definitely played his way onto the NBA Draft radar. I doubt he leaves without a 1st round guarantee, which could well happen by season's end with the way he's playing.
No way in hell I'd let him get out of the 1st round. Would be nuts.