GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:th87 wrote:Ron Swanson wrote:I'm not gonna argue with anyone that suggests we need to upgrade the roster on the fringes/bench, or that Bud needs to cut out his more annoying tendencies like playing guys he "trusts" over younger guys that could have provided more defensive resistance. Both fair points.
There's some stuff to glean from this series but at the end of the day, it essentially just boils down to Grayson/Wes/Hill not being able to even remotely replicate Middleton's 20/5/5 type production. Be mad that the coaching staff couldn't X's and O's away their lack of half-court shot creation if you want, but the personnel equivalent of turning water into wine is a pretty tall order for any team.
But it was almost enough. One tactical change might have been the difference (e.g. not letting useless Hill awaken Tatum, who was starting to make vacation plans).
why are you not giving any credit to all the tactical moves we did make that kept us in this series?
in the games we won celtics fans were freaking for how many "3's they were settling for"
every single guy besides horford was on the hot seat with boston fans over the course of this series and every time we had the lead the media, the fans, ime.... everybody wasnt suggesting they just need to shoot more 3's. IT WAS THE EXACT OPPOSITE!!!!!!!!
the entire discussion shouldnt be on the 3's they hit eventually at an expected rate. it should be on the fact we never had a single game, not one, where any of our guys outside of pat and giannis played even to their norm let alone above it offensively
tactically.... bud was picasso by giving us the lead 3 times in this series on the back of one amazing but horribly inefficient player in giannis. it was literally a defensive clinic we ran on them
That defensive tactic was called hope. As in, we're going to leave them open and hope they miss. It did work three times, and considering the personnel, it may have been the best strategy available. Probably not a title contending strategy, however.
The Celtics changed defensive philosophy after game 1 to limit Giannis's role as a facilitator. They stayed home, and in general, Giannis wasn't an efficient enough scorer to punish them and Jrue was abysmal. There was no plan B. I don't necessarily think it would have mattered as the Celts D was great and the Bucks talent on offense was dismal with the Middleton injury.