Bucks/Heat Player of the Game

trwi7 · Post #1 » by **trwi7** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:45 am

Mo Williams: 35 points (10-22 FG), 3 rebounds, 6 assists

Andrew Bogut: 17 points (7-9 FG), 8 rebounds, 3 assists

Bobby Simmons: 12 points (5-15 FG), 9 rebounds, 4 assists

Charlie Bell: 11 points (4-9 FG), 5 rebounds, 5 assists

DocHolliday · Post #2 » by **DocHolliday** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:47 am

How can anyone not pick Mo Dub?

bayrdbandit · Post #3 » by **bayrdbandit** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:48 am

how did charlie bell get home fast enough to give himself a vote?

mo pog obviously.

tyland · Post #4 » by **tyland** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:49 am

Clearly Mo was POG.

Like the effort from the supporting cast though.

paul · Post #5 » by **paul** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:49 am

Mo, no doubt. His D still worries hell out of me but he was huge tonight. Bogut solid, the heat did a good job of denying the pass into him. Simmons solid, Bell ok as well, Yi pretty average again except for a 5 minute period. CV might have killed his starting hopes with a horrible 5 minutes.

BrewCityBBQ · Post #6 » by **BrewCityBBQ** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:50 am

Why cant Bogut get over that double double hump? On that note I select Mo.

jeremyd236 · Post #7 » by **jeremyd236** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:55 am

InsideOut · Post #8 » by **InsideOut** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:57 am

jeremyd236 wrote:REDD

Who's Redd?

Stopshere2 · Post #9 » by **Stopshere2** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:59 am

Jbizzness wrote:Why cant Bogut get over that double double hump? On that note I select Mo.

Yeah, it is surprising how he disappears from the stat screen for big stretches. The only think he did statistically in the 4th was 2 FTs and I think a foul.

Mo was PotG for me but, although he didn't shoot efficiently, Bobby had a good outing - 12/9/4/2.

Didn't Bogut have a block or 2 that hasn't been statted again?

trwi7 · Post #10 » by **trwi7** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:01 am

Stopshere2 wrote:Mo was PotG for me but, although he didn't shoot efficiently

He actually did. He just took two long shots at the end of quarters that hurt his percentage. You know, he doesn't care about that unlike some players. :wink:

icat2000 · Post #11 » by **icat2000** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:05 am

I voted for Molander.

Mike X · Post #12 » by **Mike X** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:06 am

4 votes for Bogut. What sort of kangaroo **** is that. Kohl is a mome is going to be very,very upset.

midranger · Post #13 » by **midranger** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:06 am

Stopshere2 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Mo was PotG for me but, although he didn't shoot efficiently, Bobby had a good outing - 12/9/4/2.

What the hell?

He shot 45.4% from the field. 100% (12 FTA) from the line.

Had he not thrown up two 35 foot threes on the run to end the quarter, he shoots 50%.

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #14 » by **Buck You** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:06 am

Mo easily. He dominated.

Stopshere2 · Post #15 » by **Stopshere2** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:07 am

trwi7 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

He actually did. He just took two long shots at the end of quarters that hurt his percentage. You know, he doesn't care about that unlike some players.

the inefficiency referred to Bobby

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #16 » by **Buck You** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:07 am

midranger wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

What the hell?

He shot 45.4% from the field. 100% (12 FTA) from the line.

Had he not thrown up two 35 foot threes on the run to end the quarter, he shoots 50%.

He worded and wrote that badly. But he was talking about Simmons with the "although he did not shoot efficiently" line.

paul · Post #17 » by **paul** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:07 am

Stopshere2 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Yeah, it is surprising how he disappears from the stat screen for big stretches. The only think he did statistically in the 4th was 2 FTs and I think a foul.

Mo was PotG for me but, although he didn't shoot efficiently, Bobby had a good outing - 12/9/4/2.

Didn't Bogut have a block or 2 that hasn't been statted again?

Watching the game i thought mo shot pretty well, those two buzzer beaters won't have helped.

The heat made a real focus of denying bogut the ball in the post, they often gave him a man defender and left a help player there so that he couldn't catch in there. When he got the ball he was very effective so i suppose they thought rather than have him destroy blount they'd take their licks from the perimeter and other guys.

jeremyd236 · Post #18 » by **jeremyd236** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:09 am

HOW MANY POINTS DID WADE HAVE TONIGHT, just curious?

I mean the when the Bucks played them last week, I thought Redd was the only reason that Wade "went off"?

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #19 » by **Buck You** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:09 am

jeremyd236 wrote:HOW MANY POINTS DID WADE HAVE TONIGHT, just curious?

I mean the when the Bucks played them last week, I thought Redd was the only reason that Wade "went off"?

Wade had 34 I think. But he's just an outstanding player. It takes a lot to slow him down.

Stopshere2 · Post #20 » by **Stopshere2** » Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:10 am

midranger wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

What the hell?

He shot 45.4% from the field. 100% (12 FTA) from the line.

Had he not thrown up two 35 foot threes on the run to end the quarter, he shoots 50%.

I used 'but' when I probably should have used 'and'.