Trade thought w/ NJN

CBUCK06 · Post #1 » by **CBUCK06** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:58 pm

CV and Gadz for Josh Boone, A. Wright, Collins and a future 1st.

Gadz gives us nothing and CV is a yo yo, but from NYC so being in NJ could help him.

Boone would be a solid backup 4/5. Collins is a bigger beefier backup 5.

RayRayJones · Post #2 » by **RayRayJones** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:01 pm

And NJ does this..why?

EastSideBucksFan · Post #3 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:01 pm

Id be surprised if NJ did that without giving us the first round pick.

I'd do it without the pick.

They might do it b/c they are desperate to get a PF who can score. We would get Collins who has one year shorter on his deal than Gadz, Boone who can give minutes at the 4/5 and Wright who could play SF (but he's a FA at the end of the year)

Baddy Chuck · Post #4 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 6:01 pm

They NEVER would do it. Boone has more value then CV I would hope. Collins has more value then Gadz more then likely. And they add in a first and Wright?

CBUCK06 · Post #5 » by **CBUCK06** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:18 pm

Boone has more value than CV? Wow that is very, very sad.

EastSideBucksFan · Post #6 » by **EastSideBucksFan** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:21 pm

First off you have to take the first out. Thats just unrealistic.

NJ decided to give up their rights for Antoine meaning he will be an UFA after this offseason.

Jason Collins still has another year on his deal and has proven beyond the shadow of a doubt he is a Top 3 least productive player on the floor. The only thing that keeps him out there is his man defense.

They might do CV/Gadz for Wright/Collins thats about the most realistic IMO

Post #7 » by **Ruzious** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 8:18 pm

RayRayJones wrote:And NJ does this..why?

Because they want to get soft. :lol:

Baddy Chuck · Post #8 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sat Jan 19, 2008 11:07 pm

CBUCK06 wrote:Boone has more value than CV? Wow that is very, very sad.

Have you seen Boones games this year where he actually played? Hes an above average player I would say.

Lippo · Post #9 » by **Lippo** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:04 am

i suggest

Ivey,Redd,CV

for

Kidd and S.Williams

gives us a play making PG and a great defender at the 4/5

Baddy Chuck · Post #10 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:20 am

Lippo wrote:i suggest

Ivey,Redd,CV

for

Kidd and S.Williams

gives us a play making PG and a great defender at the 4/5

LMAO, since when did 2 mediocre players and one star get a superstar and a good player?

xTitan · Post #11 » by **xTitan** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 12:26 am

Again the Bucks need help at the 1,2, or 3....I don't know why everyone is trying to get a back-up PF.

CBUCK06 · Post #12 » by **CBUCK06** » Sun Jan 20, 2008 1:41 am

Kidd won't be happy here.

What about Gadz for Collins.

Neither is doing much for either team right now.

Da big3 · Post #13 » by **Da big3** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:59 am

No to all, Boone is a beast, who is Gadz and CV anyway?

Baddy Chuck · Post #14 » by **Baddy Chuck** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:17 am

Da big3 wrote:No to all, Boone is a beast, who is Gadz and CV anyway?

Honestly we know its not good but dont act like CV is Awvee Storey. We both know he has value.