Does the Gasol Trade Mean

magpies · Post #1 » by **magpies** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 2:48 am

That Odom is available, if so he is a type of player we need, He can play the three or four, In the last couple of years he has shown he has a all round ability on the court and does not always have the desire to score heaps but he rebounds, passes and has alot of experience.

The Lakers might look at taking Gaz, Simmons for him as they need another C and Simmons (well I am not sure any team wants him but him going helps us)

wichmae · Post #2 » by **wichmae** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 3:02 am

wow,why the hell would LAL take Simmons and Gadz for Odom????

step3profit · Post #3 » by **step3profit** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 3:28 am

they toss in kobe and farmar, the bucks toss in redd an mo, and you've got yourself a stew going.

bango_the_buck · Post #4 » by **bango_the_buck** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 3:48 am

I was expecting you to say, 'Does that mean Mike Conley Jr. is available?'...

bango_the_buck · Post #5 » by **bango_the_buck** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 3:50 am

CV for Conley and then the Mo for Marvin trade anyone?

CBUCK06 · Post #6 » by **CBUCK06** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 4:03 am

I like Kyle Lowry. MEM is having a fire sale. I'd suggest CV for Miller but we already have too many perimeter shooters. Everything must go!

MajorDad · Post #7 » by **MajorDad** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 4:20 am

darko looked very good in his last game starting in place of Gashol and playing 40 minutes. His stats for that game were better than Bogut's lofty hall of fame all star caliber january average. I guess the memphis GM decided Darko was the man for the center position. it's too bad the Bucks didn't have the insight to acquire Darko when orlando was giving him away.

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #8 » by **Buck You** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 6:25 am

MajorDad wrote:darko looked very good in his last game starting in place of Gashol and playing 40 minutes. His stats for that game were better than Bogut's lofty hall of fame all star caliber january average. I guess the memphis GM decided Darko was the man for the center position. it's too bad the Bucks didn't have the insight to acquire Darko when orlando was giving him away.

Because of one game, yeah. Remember the last time the Bucks acquired a player because of one game? How did that work out.

bigredbadger · Post #9 » by **bigredbadger** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 7:55 am

we would be lucky if they took CVill and Dan for him. we need to try and get conley if this makes him available.

Post #10 » by **blkout** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:19 am

ReddBogutCharlieV wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Because of one game, yeah. Remember the last time the Bucks acquired a player because of one game? How did that work out.

Hey, Darko's 6 points and 5 rebounds per game on 43% shooting would be invaluable! Damn you Larry Harris!

L&H_05 · Post #11 » by **L&H_05** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 8:35 am

I love these cliffhanger titles that leave you in no other reaction but suspense and anticipation before you click it....

Post #12 » by **paulpressey25** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 2:52 pm

I think the Gasol trade means we contact the Bulls to be our trading partners on something.....

Paxson has now struck out on KG, Kobe and Gasol.....Redd is next on the list....

Sigra · Post #13 » by **Sigra** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 3:36 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:I think the Gasol trade means we contact the Bulls to be our trading partners on something.....

Paxson has now struck out on KG, Kobe and Gasol.....Redd is next on the list....

Redd is perfect for them and Nocioni is perfect for us :pray:

Kablooie · Post #14 » by **Kablooie** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 3:40 pm

Doesn't seem like Odom would be a very good fit for this team. We lack energy enough, the last thing we need is someone who puts forth 50% effort every night and has no real drive to win. I know we're hard up for a small forward, but we're not going to get him for nothing, and the Lakers need quality defenders and role players, which we really can't offer much of.

kebzach · Post #15 » by **kebzach** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 4:52 pm

bango_the_buck wrote:I was expecting you to say, 'Does that mean Mike Conley Jr. is available?'...

Me too. There will definitely be a PG available in Memphis sooner or later.

msiris · Post #16 » by **msiris** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 4:56 pm

Why do we need a PG? If you do not like Mo doesn't Session deserve a chance?

GrandAdmiralDan · Post #17 » by **GrandAdmiralDan** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 5:43 pm

bango_the_buck wrote:CV for Conley and then the Mo for Marvin trade anyone?

Why in the world would Memphis even for a millisecond consider trading Conley for CV?

I know I mentioned the other day that CV had more value than some people were giving him credit for, but he doesn't have anywhere close to THAT much value.

Isocleas2 · Post #18 » by **Isocleas2** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 5:46 pm

Isn't Lamar "I only got one good hand" Odom known for having relatively low basketball IQ? He'd fit right in here but I don't see how it helps us.

REDDzone · Post #19 » by **REDDzone** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 5:58 pm

kebzach wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Me too. There will definitely be a PG available in Memphis sooner or later.

It certainly won't be Conley in my opinion.

coolhandluke121 · Post #20 » by **coolhandluke121** » Sat Feb 2, 2008 7:32 pm

I wanted Conley more than Yi all along and I stand by that, I would trade Yi for Conley in a heartbeat. Then trade Mo next summer when he's no longer BYC.