Louisville at Marquette, 6 Tonight

SheedsWeed · Post #1 » by **SheedsWeed** » Mon Feb 4, 2008 10:04 pm

Should be a good game, anyone gonna watch? Definitely gonna be watching Jerry Smith cause he went to my HS.

75totheMACCfund · Post #2 » by **75totheMACCfund** » Mon Feb 4, 2008 10:28 pm

well we all know that Tosa East owns Marquette...why even bother watching?

miggs0721 · Post #3 » by **miggs0721** » Mon Feb 4, 2008 10:52 pm

MU by at least 10. book it, lock and load

75totheMACCfund · Post #4 » by **75totheMACCfund** » Mon Feb 4, 2008 11:18 pm

can't overlook this aspect of the game.

Post #5 » by **MickeyDavis** » Mon Feb 4, 2008 11:36 pm

In HD on ESPN.

aboveAverage · Post #6 » by **aboveAverage** » Mon Feb 4, 2008 11:47 pm

SheedsWeed wrote:Should be a good game, anyone gonna watch? Definitely gonna be watching Jerry Smith cause he went to my HS.

You went to east? When did you graduate?

trwi7 · Post #7 » by **trwi7** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 1:12 am

miggs0721 wrote:MU by at least 10. book it, lock and load

They better outscore Louisville by 20 in the next 17 minutes then.

Mags FTW · Post #8 » by **Mags FTW** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 1:38 am

So what's the deal with MU? I'm a UW fan and after that game at the Kohl I started to believe the Marquette hype. But they don't look that great. The BE is the best conference, so you could say competition but they struggle against some of the lower tier teams too.

El Duderino · Post #9 » by **El Duderino** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 1:57 am

Mags FTW wrote:So what's the deal with MU? I'm a UW fan and after that game at the Kohl I started to believe the Marquette hype. But they don't look that great. The BE is the best conference, so you could say competition but they struggle against some of the lower tier teams too.

They have two problems that cause them to struggle badly in some games

1. No quality big men Marquette can count on to produce

2. They shoot poorly from outside to often. With the three point shot in college ball being such a short shot, teams gotta make them to win most games when teams are pretty evenly matched talent wise. Marquette is 4-17 from three tonight and they've missed many other open two point jumpers. Can't win games when you can't make open shots.

Mags FTW · Post #10 » by **Mags FTW** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 2:02 am

miggs0721 wrote:MU by at least 10. book it, lock and load

Is it just me or does it seem like every time someone says "book it" in a prediction they turn out to be terribly wrong?

More Bang For The Bucks · Post #11 » by **More Bang For The Bucks** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 3:00 am

I miss Al Maguire, Rick Majerus, and Nellie too speaking of Milwaukee hoop legends.

Siefer · Post #12 » by **Siefer** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 4:48 am

I was at work during the game. Every time I checked the score it seemed to get worse and worse.

Chuck Diesel · Post #13 » by **Chuck Diesel** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 6:28 am

Fire Tom Crean? :dontknow:

Bucks_Revenge · Post #14 » by **Bucks_Revenge** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 7:44 am

marquette in my opinion are overrated....I see them getting to the sweet sixteen at best and thats if everything goes right and get lucky with match ups.

Mags FTW · Post #15 » by **Mags FTW** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 8:18 am

Chuck Diesel wrote:Fire Tom Crean?

He's been living off of that Final Four way too long. If I'm correct, they haven't won a tourney game since then.

Bucks_Revenge · Post #16 » by **Bucks_Revenge** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 9:00 am

Mags FTW wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

He's been living off of that Final Four way too long. If I'm correct, they haven't won a tourney game since then.

you are correct, he does have a couple of NIT wins.

Bucks_Revenge · Post #17 » by **Bucks_Revenge** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 9:01 am

and also as longest wade is a superstar Tom Crean will be coach all he can say is I got that guy.

El Duderino · Post #18 » by **El Duderino** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 9:56 am

Mags FTW wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

He's been living off of that Final Four way too long. If I'm correct, they haven't won a tourney game since then.

What i can't figure out about Crean is how he is so good at recruiting guards/small forwards, but can't rarely ever recruit quality big men.

Mags FTW · Post #19 » by **Mags FTW** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 1:09 pm

El Duderino wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

What i can't figure out about Crean is how he is so good at recruiting guards/small forwards, but can't rarely ever recruit quality big men.

I've always wondered that too. But honestly, I don't think he's a good coach. In that Final Four game he had 3 future NBAers in Wade, Diener, and Novak and that team got absolutely embarrassed.

worthlessBucks · Post #20 » by **worthlessBucks** » Tue Feb 5, 2008 1:26 pm

Part of Marquette's problem is their lack of non conference road games, their team just isn't as prepared as they should be to travel against stiff competition. I know last night's game was home, but they do genuinely struggle on the road against decent competition, their last victory against Cincinnati doesn't qualify as such. I believe they just scheduled a home & home against Tenn & Pearl for next year, so that should help them in the future.

I will have a good laugh if Crean again loses in the first round of the NCAA's. For the amount he's paid, one would assume that Tom would have had more success than the Final Four year that came 5 years ago. Maybe this is their year, but as of right now I figure that Marquette will wind up somewhere in that 5-8 range and we'll have to see the style they're matched up against.