ImageImage

My Trade To Re-structure the bucks: Memphis/Milwaukee/Miami

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

showtimesam
Veteran
Posts: 2,760
And1: 43
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: Wisconsin

My Trade To Re-structure the bucks: Memphis/Milwaukee/Miami 

Post#1 » by showtimesam » Sat Feb 9, 2008 5:24 pm

Bucks Trade:
Michael Redd (miami)
Desmond Mason (miami)
Dan Gadzuric (miami)

Bucks Recieve:
Mike Miller
Dorrel Wright
Jason Williams

Memphis Trades:
Mike Miller (milwaukee)

Memphis Recieves
Ricky Davis


Miami Trades:
Jason Williams (milwaukee)
Ricky Davis (Memphis)
Dorel Wright (milwaukee)

Miami Recieves:
Michael Redd
Dan Gadzuric
Dez Mason

This trade benefits all sides. The heat can have a very formidable big three (marion/wade/redd) and add an athletic center to run up and down the court (gadz)

Memphis gets another expiring deal, and if they really want something else, maybe the bucks could throw in CV.

From there, the bucks get a cheaper michael redd in miller and a possible solution for their sf spot in dorel wright.

Bucks New Lineup:

Mo Williams/Ivey
Mike Miller/Charlie Bell
Dorel Wright/Bobby Simmons
CV/Yi
Bogut/Voskuhl

Depending on how wright plays, you could also start bell or ivey in the backcourt and shift miller to the front court. But this trade allows the bucks to drastically reduce salaries with miller instead of redd, and dumping gadz contract. I'd think the bucks would be best off just cutting jason williams as soon as the trade goes down.

Now the heats lineup (pre lotto pick)

Dwayne Wade/
Michael Redd/Dez Mason
Shawn Marion/Dez Mason
Haslem/
Gadz/Mark Blount
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,324
And1: 4,715
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

 

Post#2 » by Max Green » Sat Feb 9, 2008 5:32 pm

I can't wait until the trade deadline so we can atleast put to rest these ridiculous trade threads. Replacing Redd with Miller makes the Bucks a worse team, while making the Heat better.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
:wizard: Maxtradamus
showtimesam
Veteran
Posts: 2,760
And1: 43
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: Wisconsin

 

Post#3 » by showtimesam » Sat Feb 9, 2008 5:35 pm

It cuts salary (so we can re-up bogut)

Adds a less selfish version of redd with slightly better D, which is addition by subtraction (miller)

Adds an athletic player at the sf spot

I think it makes the bucks a better "Team"
User avatar
kebzach
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,397
And1: 11
Joined: Nov 13, 2006
Location: Illini Fan Trapped in WI

 

Post#4 » by kebzach » Sat Feb 9, 2008 5:36 pm

MVP4Champ wrote:I can't wait until the trade deadline so we can atleast put to rest these ridiculous trade threads.


I agree. Every one of them is more stupid than the one before.
User avatar
drew881
RealGM
Posts: 12,682
And1: 5,484
Joined: Aug 14, 2007

 

Post#5 » by drew881 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 5:58 pm

kebzach wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I agree. Every one of them is more stupid than the one before.


But it is so easy to say each trade is more stupid than the next and not come up with your own. Lets see you come up with a better trade.

That said I think this is a good trade. We have been talking about Mike Miller trades for a while now, but Memphis wasn't interested in taking on Redd. Miami could, and might want him. They have the expiring contracts to offer memphis and to us. I think They want to eventually get Wade out of playing pg however, so this is only a temporary fix. I could however see next year a lineup of

PG
Wade
Redd
Marion
Haslem

PG being someone acquired via free agency or trade who plays decent D and doesn't need to shoot (Charlie Bell??)
aboveAverage
RealGM
Posts: 10,976
And1: 2,905
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
 

 

Post#6 » by aboveAverage » Sat Feb 9, 2008 6:17 pm

MVP4Champ wrote:Replacing Redd with Miller makes the Bucks a worse team, while making the Heat better.

How does getting a more athletic, more unselfish, taller, better defender make us worse?
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,324
And1: 4,715
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

 

Post#7 » by Max Green » Sat Feb 9, 2008 6:42 pm

It makes us worse because Redd is a better player then Miller.
The only thing Miller has on Redd is that he's taller and more athletic and he's a barely a better rebounder. But overall Redd is a much better player. Let's see how unselfish he is now that he's been made the go to guy like Redd has been the last few years.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
:wizard: Maxtradamus
showtimesam
Veteran
Posts: 2,760
And1: 43
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: Wisconsin

 

Post#8 » by showtimesam » Sat Feb 9, 2008 6:52 pm

Mike Miller is also used to playing inside-out with a big man, so he could be a better compliment to bogut's inside game.

Don't forget the benefit of having dorel wright if he can develop into a solid sf for us.
75totheMACCfund
Veteran
Posts: 2,600
And1: 47
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: 53202
       

 

Post#9 » by 75totheMACCfund » Sat Feb 9, 2008 7:17 pm

i think this is pretty reasonable...is ricky davis expiring? It just seems like memphis only wants expiring deals and i'm not sure they'd take davis if he has anymore than 1 year remaining
User avatar
WRau1
RealGM
Posts: 11,943
And1: 5,154
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
     

 

Post#10 » by WRau1 » Sat Feb 9, 2008 7:58 pm

I don't want to deal Redd, but I really like Miller so I'd be ok with it.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#11 » by skones » Sat Feb 9, 2008 8:03 pm

MVP4Champ wrote:It makes us worse because Redd is a better player then Miller.
The only thing Miller has on Redd is that he's taller and more athletic and he's a barely a better rebounder. But overall Redd is a much better player. Let's see how unselfish he is now that he's been made the go to guy like Redd has been the last few years.


Barely better rebounder? You're nuts. Miller averages close to 7 per game this season. Redd's only grabbed 6 rebounds in 12 out of the 39 games this season. That's a large diffference.

Miller is a better defender and a better athlete. He's got better length. The steals aren't there for Miller but he's much more adept in keeping up with his man.

Miller is the better passer and it isn't close. Miller's actually capable of creating easy looks for others at certain points whereas Redd has proven to be extremely poor in that aspect of the game. He's also played with Gasol for a while now forming a solid combination. He knows how to play with a good big.

Miller's also the better shooter. Redd's the better scorer. The inside out game works much better with Miller. The guy is deadly from beyond the arc shooting over 40% from three point land in 6 out of his 9 seasons. Redd in comparison hasn't done that since he was playing 6th man.

That said I'm a HUGE fan of Miller's game. He's basically Redd with less scoring and a much higher basketball IQ. We get Dorell Wright in this deal who isn't exactly a smart player but athleticism never hurts. Then you look at it and we unload Gadzuric. This is a very nice deal Sam. If Memphis follows the trend of the Pau Gasol trade they might pull the trigger. I might even throw in Villanueva to get this deal done.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,432
And1: 11,233
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#12 » by midranger » Sat Feb 9, 2008 8:04 pm

My deal with Redd.

I don't think that simply subtracting him from the roster (as in injury) makes our team better. However, replace him with Mike Miller and I do think that we'd be a better team. Mike Miller is really a taller, less selfish, much better Charlie Bell.

We're 5-5 without Redd now, 6-5 with him on the bench to end the game.

Now, take that 6-5 team, give most of Simmons and Bell's minutes to Mike Miller and give all of Awvee Storey's and some of Mo's (so he doesn't die) minutes to Bell. Boom, we probably are quite a bit better.

Mike Miller just complements this team minus Michael Redd much better than Michael Redd himself does.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#13 » by xTitan » Sat Feb 9, 2008 8:06 pm

MVP4Champ wrote:It makes us worse because Redd is a better player then Miller.
The only thing Miller has on Redd is that he's taller and more athletic and he's a barely a better rebounder. But overall Redd is a much better player. Let's see how unselfish he is now that he's been made the go to guy like Redd has been the last few years.


How do you define better??? Miller averages 2 more rebounds per game compared to Redd, Miller shoots 50% from the field compared to 44 %, Miller shoots 43% from 3 point range compared to 36% for Redd. Miller is a bigger, better athlete, who defends and will most likely cost a significant amount less then Redd.......there is no comparison.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 39,432
And1: 11,233
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#14 » by midranger » Sat Feb 9, 2008 8:08 pm

xTitan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



How do you define better??? Miller averages 2 more rebounds per game compared to Redd, Miller shoots 50% from the field compared to 44 %, Miller shoots 43% from 3 point range compared to 36% for Redd. Miller is a bigger, better athlete, who defends and will most likely cost a significant amount less then Redd.......there is no comparison.


Agreed. I'd much rather have Miller than Redd.
Max Green
RealGM
Posts: 16,324
And1: 4,715
Joined: Jul 04, 2007
Location: Heelville
 

 

Post#15 » by Max Green » Sat Feb 9, 2008 8:43 pm

xTitan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



How do you define better??? Miller averages 2 more rebounds per game compared to Redd, Miller shoots 50% from the field compared to 44 %, Miller shoots 43% from 3 point range compared to 36% for Redd. Miller is a bigger, better athlete, who defends and will most likely cost a significant amount less then Redd.......there is no comparison.


Miller also was third option on his team, while Redd was the first option going against better defenders everynight. Also, Redd takes more shots again while Miller takes more open shots a game since teams are or were more concerned with Gay/Gasol.

*Millers also a 6'8 SG/SF, ofcourse he should average more rebounds then Redd.

*He's a great 3 point shooter, but he also gets more wide open 3 point shots then Redd.

*Millers an average defender who averages less steals, but more turnovers and the same amount of Blocks and assists as Redd.

*He costs less because he's not as good of a player as Redd is. Miller is a good 3rd/4th option on a team and I wouldn't mind having him here playing Sf.
Vice President of Parker-Nation.
#Jabariunleashed
#OwnTheFuture
:wizard: Maxtradamus
User avatar
Fight the Tank
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,059
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 21, 2008
Location: Healthy Players>Injured Players

 

Post#16 » by Fight the Tank » Sat Feb 9, 2008 8:59 pm

I think this is a decent trade idea all around. I also think JWill would help the Bucks off the bench this year. They really need another adaquete ball handler off the bench.
"I just wanted to play because I just love the game," Jennings said. "It doesn't matter to me. I get up to play basketball. It's my job. I have to still be a professional and finish the season."
showtimesam
Veteran
Posts: 2,760
And1: 43
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: Wisconsin

 

Post#17 » by showtimesam » Sat Feb 9, 2008 9:15 pm

skones wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



That said I'm a HUGE fan of Miller's game. He's basically Redd with less scoring and a much higher basketball IQ. We get Dorell Wright in this deal who isn't exactly a smart player but athleticism never hurts. Then you look at it and we unload Gadzuric. This is a very nice deal Sam. If Memphis follows the trend of the Pau Gasol trade they might pull the trigger. I might even throw in Villanueva to get this deal done.


Thank you..
I would love if something like this was possible. We dump a bit of salary to help keep bogut around, add a guy that can play within the team concept better, and add a guy in wright that may turn into an asset at the 3 spot.

I'd also be willing to toss in CV to memphis if it was key to the deal. However, it looks like they are already in talks with miami for sending Miller for Davis, so maybe the expiring is enough for them.

The key would be if Riley thinks a wade/marion/redd trio can get him to the finals. If I was him, I'd take the gamble, and they will still have a high lotto pick to add along with that this offseason.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#18 » by skones » Sat Feb 9, 2008 9:40 pm

[quote="MVP4Champ"][/quote]

He would be the second or third option. Behind Mo and Bogut. He fits the team concept. Smart, talented players win basketball games.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks