RealGM

Stemming from the recent team meeting, it seems that Mo could definitely be on the trade block. As much as I love Mo, a trade may happen.

Zach Randolph (and Eddy Curry) have been put on the trading block in New York.

So, with that said, would you do this trade for Zach?

Milwaukee trades:
Mo Williams
Bobby Simmons
Dan Gadzuric

New York trades:
Zach Randolph
Malik Rose
Nate Robinson

Ivey becomes the PG many want here. Defense minded and doesn't need his own shots.

Ivey/Robinson
Redd/Bell
Mason/Noel
Randolph/Yi/Rose
Bogut/Ruffin

That team is a pretty good blend of offense, defense, and rebounding.

Losing Mo and adding f'n Zach Randolph will do nothing to improve locker room drama. Just what we need another PF.

I Emphatically REJECT this, can do better IMO

ReddManBogieMan wrote:Losing Mo and adding f'n Zach Randolph will do nothing to improve locker room drama. Just what we need another PF.

Well, if Mo and Bobby are the root of most of the problems, we would be losing 2 cancers and only adding one.

This team needs to be "blown up", not "let's trade one cancer for another cancer".

IMHO, the best scenario would be to trade everyone except Bogut and Yi for as many draft picks, expiring contracts, and young talent on rookie contracts as possible.

Not for me, I don't want Zach in any trade. Ivey isn't the point guard this team wants (although he is a solid backup), we want a far more talented version of Ivey, he's not a starting pg solution.

no matter how bad we get (if it could possibly get worse) I'd never want anything to do with Zach Randolph

not for Simmons + Gadz, not for Redd, not anything!

Agree with the others.....Zach Randolph brings his own set of problems.

These are problems that might be worth the risk if he only had one more year on his contract. But he doesn't. That massive contract means once you purchase him, there are no returns to the store. Even with your receipt.

Besides, after watching the Bucks play the Knicks, you could see the problems with Zach. The Bucks second team was killing Zach and Curry on Saturday night. Once they put in David Lee, the comeback began.

Mags FTW wrote:This team needs to be "blown up", not "let's trade one cancer for another cancer".

IMHO, the best scenario would be to trade everyone except Bogut and Yi for as many draft picks, expiring contracts, and young talent on rookie contracts as possible.

From where we are at right now, I tend to agree. There are no simple fixes here. No "trade Gadz and Simmons for a SF and see how that works".

Mo absolutely must go.
Redd should go.

The only players who should absolutely stay at this point are Yi and Bogut. Everyone else can go.

The only way i consider trading for randolph is if lee is involved and if thats the case i would turn right around and trade randolph for a bag of chips

DH34Phan wrote:Ivey becomes the PG many want here. Defense minded and doesn't need his own shots.

Just because many of us don't think mo is our best option at PG, that does not mean we want Ivey as our guy. He's absolutely horrible.

And no, still no Zach Randolph for me. I wouldn't trade for him for anything.

ahagen87 wrote:The only way i consider trading for randolph is if lee is involved and if thats the case i would turn right around and trade randolph for a bag of chips

Didn't see this post. I agree in theory, as long as they are baked nacho cheese doritos.

I would do this trade as fast as possible. There is no way that the knicks do it though.
Any trade where we lose Gadz and Simmons we do it and herb gives everyone associated with the team that took them certain favors. Wink Wink

change Nate for Balkman....and maybe...maybe....Nate's a small SG, that's it....not a PG...

The only way I would trade for Zach Randolph is if we could move Simmons and Gadzuric for him straight up.

Not a Zach Randolph fan at all.