Mo has to Go
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Mo has to Go
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 228
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 18, 2006
Mo has to Go
The Nets fiasco definitely pushed me over the edge to the position that Mo or Redd has to go! Rather keep Redd in that he is more difficult to trade and better for the Bucks. Also, have had it with smaller guards. Trading Mo may take time and the Bucks have to wait for a good deal. To eventually replace Mo, we draft Russell Westbrook out of Arizona who probably will be available at our selection. He is an athletic freak at 6'3 (Just view his dunks on YouTube). Like his 4.8 apg and a 1.7 a/to ratio. He also defends. Am willing to roll the dice at this point because as presently constructed and playing, the Bucks are on the fast train to mediocrity.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,710
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
-
Re: Mo has to Go
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 47,909
- And1: 11,582
- Joined: Jul 17, 2001
-
Re: Mo has to Go
PaBuck wrote:The Nets fiasco definitely pushed me over the edge to the position that Mo or Redd has to go! Rather keep Redd in that he is more difficult to trade and better for the Bucks. Also, have had it with smaller guards. Trading Mo may take time and the Bucks have to wait for a good deal. To eventually replace Mo, we draft Russell Westbrook out of Arizona who probably will be available at our selection. He is an athletic freak at 6'3 (Just view his dunks on YouTube). Like his 4.8 apg and a 1.7 a/to ratio. He also defends. Am willing to roll the dice at this point because as presently constructed and playing, the Bucks are on the fast train to mediocrity.
Mo gets 6.4 and a 2.3, so... that doesn't exactly help your point. I thought Westbrook was underrated early in the season, and now it's like everyone's trying to make up for that by overrating him.
But I concur with the idea of trading either Redd or Mo. My preference would be to trade Redd.
- miamiballer
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,182
- And1: 1,557
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: MIA
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,710
- And1: 4,490
- Joined: Jan 31, 2006
- Contact:
-
- MickeyDavis
- Global Mod
- Posts: 101,882
- And1: 54,997
- Joined: May 02, 2002
- Location: The Craps Table
-
EastSideBucksFan wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Thx Mickey
I guess a thread that just says "MO HAS TO GO"
is much better than one where I want to discuss if Mo would ever accept a bench role
I saw no reason to have two different Mo threads started minutes apart. If you want to discuss Mo coming off the bench instead of getting rid of him great. Post it here.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
- miamiballer
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,182
- And1: 1,557
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: MIA
msiris wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Sign me up. Why do you not like Marion?
we love marion but he simply makes too much $ and we have more needs...mo will fit in great as well as simmons...i dont know if a future lotto protected 1st should be added instead of an 08 2nd...anyway, if we add beasley, simmons and mo along with wade and haslem and wright that could be the start of a very nice core
- DH34Phan
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,627
- And1: 114
- Joined: Jun 30, 2005
- Contact:
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,829
- And1: 1,571
- Joined: Aug 06, 2005
- Location: Underground King
-
- miamiballer
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,182
- And1: 1,557
- Joined: May 11, 2002
- Location: MIA
Nebula1 wrote:Ramon is going to save the team.
Hey, why not?
But I agree, Mo has to go or settle into a bench player.
My hopes are that Ramon has the necessary talent and we can package Mo and our draft pick to move up in the draft and get our SF of choice.
if we move out of the top 2, like 3 or 4, id consider trading it to you guys for mo and your pick
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,982
- And1: 7,326
- Joined: Sep 23, 2007
Trade Mo, bring back Ivey, and let Bell, Ivey, and Sessions battle for the starting pg spot in training camp. They are all big pg's who can feed the post, defend sg's or pg's, and won't take a ton of shots. I think the Bucks could be okay with Bell although he's not ideal. I have a hard time imagining a Mo trade that gets an upgrade at pg in return - maybe Andre Miller, whose contract expires the following year?
If they draft a pg in the top 10 I think they can start Bell for a year while grooming his successor.
Mo will be eminently tradeable in the summer, don't you worry. He could help a lot of teams, teams that had nothing to offer at the trade deadline but will have draft picks and exiring contracts this summer.
If they draft a pg in the top 10 I think they can start Bell for a year while grooming his successor.
Mo will be eminently tradeable in the summer, don't you worry. He could help a lot of teams, teams that had nothing to offer at the trade deadline but will have draft picks and exiring contracts this summer.
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
coolhandluke121 wrote:Trade Mo, bring back Ivey, and let Bell, Ivey, and Sessions battle for the starting pg spot in training camp. They are all big pg's who can feed the post, defend sg's or pg's, and won't take a ton of shots.
I'm sorry but can everybody please stop talking about Royal Ivey as this great defender? He blows. He sucks on offense, he sucks on defense. Nobody saw him get dominated by Devin Harris?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.