Bogut quits on team.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
Bogut quits on team.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,434
- And1: 11,237
- Joined: May 12, 2002
Bogut quits on team.
Again. I think this deserves it's own thread as it's kind of been glossed over.
If you want to pay this guy huge money and bow to his every whim, well... good luck.
Your team leader: Andrew Bogut.
If you want to pay this guy huge money and bow to his every whim, well... good luck.
Your team leader: Andrew Bogut.
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
Yeah this was just a disgusting display. Right after he goes on the radio and says what this team needs he goes out and quits on the team. Isn't that refreshing everybody?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
- raferfenix
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,091
- And1: 4,451
- Joined: Apr 05, 2003
I'm as big a Bogut supporter as you get, but he needs to be called out on this crap----if only to hlep our contract negotiations with him, as there's no way he should be making statements about what our team needs to do for him to stay here if he's not willing to give his all.
Depessingly, I think he still tries harder on D more often than anyone on our team. However, we'll never get anywhere if he doesn't COMPLETELY turn this around.
I would kill to have a defensive minded center who does all the little things while also making players around him better on offense. At this point though, i'm pretty sick of every single thing that has to do wtih our team. Damn.
Depessingly, I think he still tries harder on D more often than anyone on our team. However, we'll never get anywhere if he doesn't COMPLETELY turn this around.
I would kill to have a defensive minded center who does all the little things while also making players around him better on offense. At this point though, i'm pretty sick of every single thing that has to do wtih our team. Damn.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,490
- And1: 872
- Joined: Jan 25, 2006
The biggest mistake that Stotts made was after the fourth playoff game and Bogut's lack of effort during it, particularly the second half, not benching him for the 5th game and saying exactly why he was doing it. I am sure that would have ended his job immediately, as Harris and Kohl were hawking the wonders of Andrew; but it is what was needed.
You can never let anyone give up during a game with no consequences. The only consequences for Bogut for that display was he got his way about being the starting center and the things necessary for that to make any sense (getting rid of Ford for a PF who could create space from 15 ft shootingfor Bogut, getting rid of Magloire who would have killed bogut in practice, etc.) The guy who quit duirng a critical playoff game ( it would have been 2-2) got rewarded instead of a boot to the ass. No wonder the behavior gets repeated.
You can never let anyone give up during a game with no consequences. The only consequences for Bogut for that display was he got his way about being the starting center and the things necessary for that to make any sense (getting rid of Ford for a PF who could create space from 15 ft shootingfor Bogut, getting rid of Magloire who would have killed bogut in practice, etc.) The guy who quit duirng a critical playoff game ( it would have been 2-2) got rewarded instead of a boot to the ass. No wonder the behavior gets repeated.
- raferfenix
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,091
- And1: 4,451
- Joined: Apr 05, 2003
'Epicurus wrote:The biggest mistake that Stotts made was after the fourth playoff game and Bogut's lack of effort during it, particularly the second half, not benching him for the 5th game and saying exactly why he was doing it. I am sure that would have ended his job immediately, as Harris and Kohl were hawking the wonders of Andrew; but it is what was needed.
You can never let anyone give up during a game with no consequences. The only consequences for Bogut for that display was he got his way about being the starting center and the things necessary for that to make any sense (getting rid of Ford for a PF who could create space from 15 ft shootingfor Bogut, getting rid of Magloire who would have killed bogut in practice, etc.) The guy who quit duirng a critical playoff game ( it would have been 2-2) got rewarded instead of a boot to the ass. No wonder the behavior gets repeated.
Agreed in full. Sadly, I dont think LK has nearly the credibility that even Stots had with the team or the fans to amke it worth him calling out Bogut (in fact, I think it would have helped stotts a lot to call out bogut/redd/mo more often).
Larry Harryis, Herb Kohl, or maybe a player like Desmond Mason or Michael Redd should say something aobut this though. It's long past time for this emo crap to end.
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 62,521
- And1: 29,523
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
I remember over a year ago Pliska came on and said Dalembert >>>>> Bogut. At the time it was a shocking statement on these boards. Very few bought into it. Yet I recite it all the time since afterwards I've watched both guys closely. And I hate to say it, but for the last two years, I'd rather have had Dalembert on my team. He's an elite rebounder and shotblocker.....and seems to be able to score about as well as Bogut does.
I keep waiting for Bogut to break out and leave Dalembert in the dust. But then he's always full of games like these make you realize that Bogut has a long way to go....a long way.
I keep waiting for Bogut to break out and leave Dalembert in the dust. But then he's always full of games like these make you realize that Bogut has a long way to go....a long way.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 42,327
- And1: 2,551
- Joined: Dec 05, 2005
paulpressey25 wrote:I remember over a year ago Pliska came on and said Dalembert >>>>> Bogut. At the time it was a shocking statement on these boards. Very few bought into it. Yet I recite it all the time since afterwards I've watched both guys closely. And I hate to say it, but for the last two years, I'd rather have had Dalembert on my team. He's an elite rebounder and shotblocker.....and seems to be able to score about as well as Bogut does.
I keep waiting for Bogut to break out and leave Dalembert in the dust. But then he's always full of games like these make you realize that Bogut has a long way to go....a long way.
I agree with my previous statements and your review of them.
Dalembert is still a superior athlete, defender and rebounder while Bogut has far superior offensive skills.
Two different type of players, but they are both on the same level.
I also wish that Bogut could turn the corner and really elevate his game to be something besides just an average/slightly above average player... But he hasn't.
- paulpressey25
- Senior Mod - Bucks
- Posts: 62,521
- And1: 29,523
- Joined: Oct 27, 2002
-
adamcz wrote:I can envision the Bucks nervously paying Bogut whatever it costs to retain him, in order to avoid "losing him for nothing." Will probably make the same mistake that was made with Redd.
I just lowered my offer on the contract extension from our thread 10-days ago.....5-years/$50 million. Otherwise let him blow up next season and prove it to us.
- raferfenix
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,091
- And1: 4,451
- Joined: Apr 05, 2003
We should remember that Dalembert has been in the league longer than bogut, so he certainly has a lot of time to turn the effort around just like Dalembert. His effort also started turning around when they dumped the selfish prima donna Allen Iverson (I'm a fan of his, but there's no doubt that this is what he became by the end of his tenure in philly).
I'm hoping that if we get an experienced coach willing to call Bogut and others out in combination of us dumping selfish and lazy players will inspire Bogut to turn it around like Dalembert in a big way.
If he does that, then I would prefer Bogut for his infinitely superior bball iq (especially passing), but our team despreatley needs this to stop.
I'm hoping that if we get an experienced coach willing to call Bogut and others out in combination of us dumping selfish and lazy players will inspire Bogut to turn it around like Dalembert in a big way.
If he does that, then I would prefer Bogut for his infinitely superior bball iq (especially passing), but our team despreatley needs this to stop.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,434
- And1: 11,237
- Joined: May 12, 2002
raferfenix wrote:We should remember that Dalembert has been in the league longer than bogut, so he certainly has a lot of time to turn the effort around just like Dalembert. His effort also started turning around when they dumped the selfish prima donna Allen Iverson (I'm a fan of his, but there's no doubt that this is what he became by the end of his tenure in philly).
I'm hoping that if we get an experienced coach willing to call Bogut and others out in combination of us dumping selfish and lazy players will inspire Bogut to turn it around like Dalembert in a big way.
If he does that, then I would prefer Bogut for his infinitely superior bball iq (especially passing), but our team despreatley needs this to stop.
Um, then Bogut would no longer be here.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,982
- And1: 2,249
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
- Location: Central Wisconsin
We do not know why Bogut is shutting down. The Bucks are so screwed up right now I would not be surprised if they told him to take it easy. CV is getting a lot more shots over the last few games. Are they showcasing him more to increase his trade value? Who really wants the Bucks to get the 8th seed at 10 games under .500 ? Would it be better to have shot at a higher pick that could help us move players and picks or just draft a better player? Right now this means nothing. The team is crap and we all know it.
Ride the tank
-
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,533
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 17, 2006
I'm holding out hope that Bogut's still having hip problems that are accounting for his recent issues. If so, perhaps they should shut him down for a week or two or the season. No point playing him if he's that badly injured.
If it isn't the hip then his recent play has just been dirt, no doubt. I'm at the point where I think that the talk this offseason shouldn't be about an extension but rather a trade. I just don't think he's happy with his place on the team or in the organisation. His trade value is still good enough, so this offseason would be the time to roll the dice. If the Bucks can get a serviceable centre and someone that brings consistently good play then go for it. Better for both parties if they part ways.
If it isn't the hip then his recent play has just been dirt, no doubt. I'm at the point where I think that the talk this offseason shouldn't be about an extension but rather a trade. I just don't think he's happy with his place on the team or in the organisation. His trade value is still good enough, so this offseason would be the time to roll the dice. If the Bucks can get a serviceable centre and someone that brings consistently good play then go for it. Better for both parties if they part ways.
Das ist nümberwang!
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,295
- And1: 196
- Joined: Feb 21, 2005
- Location: Madison
-
- trwi7
- RealGM
- Posts: 111,685
- And1: 27,269
- Joined: Jul 12, 2006
- Location: Aussie bias
-
adamcz wrote:We can't shut Bogut down. Fantasy playoffs are coming up.
If he keeps playing like this how much will he help?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."
I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.