ImageImage

Woelfel: "Bucks have plenty of GM options"

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

fam3381
General Manager
Posts: 7,576
And1: 174
Joined: Jun 07, 2005
Location: Austin

Woelfel: "Bucks have plenty of GM options" 

Post#1 » by fam3381 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:36 pm

http://my.journaltimes.com/post/woelfel ... tions.html

The Milwaukee Bucks
Retired Bucks blogger. Occasional Bucks podcaster.
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,522
And1: 29,525
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#2 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:40 pm

Seems like a number of names in there who could be brought in to work underneath the Kohl/Ron Walter power structure......

But no real "names" that you know could challenge the Kohl/Ron Walter structure.......
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,901
And1: 55,008
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#3 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:45 pm

Some decent talent there but as PP says, no one that most fans would say "WOW!".

I hate seeing Sund and Babcocks name there. :noway:
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
blkout
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 31,689
And1: 1,914
Joined: Dec 12, 2005
Location: Melbourne
 

 

Post#4 » by blkout » Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:56 pm

Does Joey Hammond have anything to do with the Pistons drafting lately? If so I would take him fairly quickly, especially from that list... I think he'd have the best "pedigree" considering he's coming from not only a championship team, but a tough defensive championship team. Polar opposite of the Bucks but that's a good thing.
Image
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#5 » by LUKE23 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:03 pm

The Bucks can definitely find someone better than Babcock out of that list. If they do hire Babcock or Sund, it just screams complacency by the organization.
EastSideBucksFan
RealGM
Posts: 18,710
And1: 4,490
Joined: Jan 31, 2006
Contact:
 

 

Post#6 » by EastSideBucksFan » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:22 pm

Kiki Vandeweghe should be on that list


He was instrumental in reshaping the Nuggets roster and knows how to clear out bad contracts



I'd take the guys from the Pistons or Mavericks although I know nothing about them.


But they could be the "outside perspective with a history of success" that Herb is referring to
PaBuck
Sophomore
Posts: 228
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 18, 2006

 

Post#7 » by PaBuck » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:28 pm

Babcock in charge of the draft? Legitimate contender for the GM position? Kohl, rather than totally destruct the team, sell it already!
in8
Sophomore
Posts: 167
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 14, 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia

 

Post#8 » by in8 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:46 pm

It's depressing how critical this appointment is for the future of the franchise.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,901
And1: 55,008
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#9 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Mar 24, 2008 2:51 pm

The hiring of a new GM is critical for any team no matter what their situation.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
THE DINJ
Starter
Posts: 2,005
And1: 121
Joined: Jun 25, 2006
Location: Madison, WI
   

 

Post#10 » by THE DINJ » Mon Mar 24, 2008 3:53 pm

Woelfel: "Bucks have plenty of crappy GM options"
Fixed. :nonono:
User avatar
carmelbrownqueen
RealGM
Posts: 14,578
And1: 42
Joined: Jun 08, 2004
Location: Somewhere thinking independently

 

Post#11 » by carmelbrownqueen » Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:28 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:Seems like a number of names in there who could be brought in to work underneath the Kohl/Ron Walter power structure......

But no real "names" that you know could challenge the Kohl/Ron Walter structure.......
Pretty much my thoughts also.
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan

"We don't accept anything but winning. We don't accept anything but playing hard." - John Hammond
GrandAdmiralDan
RealGM
Posts: 15,159
And1: 1,440
Joined: Jul 24, 2004
Location: New Berlin, WI (Milwaukee)
Contact:
     

 

Post#12 » by GrandAdmiralDan » Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:37 pm

Bah.

I hate Babcock teases.
97-98
Nick Van Exel (LAL) on defending the Stockton-Malone pick-and-roll: "Yeah,
I got a way to defend it. Bring a bat to the game and kill one of them."
Dags
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,533
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 17, 2006

 

Post#13 » by Dags » Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:51 pm

None of those names turn me on.
Das ist nümberwang!
showtimesam
Veteran
Posts: 2,760
And1: 43
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: Wisconsin

 

Post#14 » by showtimesam » Mon Mar 24, 2008 4:57 pm

None of those guys are big names, but alot seem to have some qualifications that could really help the bucks.

I like the idea of bringing in a guy with alot of experience in a winning organization even if he isn't a name.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,901
And1: 55,008
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#15 » by MickeyDavis » Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:06 pm

Yeah many of these guys may be qualified but because it would be their first shot at being a GM they are likely to not ask for, nor receive, total control.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 107,000
And1: 41,504
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

 

Post#16 » by ReasonablySober » Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:09 pm

paulpressey25 wrote:Seems like a number of names in there who could be brought in to work underneath the Kohl/Ron Walter power structure......

But no real "names" that you know could challenge the Kohl/Ron Walter structure.......


My thought's exactly. Kohl could hire the brightest and the best, but unless they have the power to overrule the inner circle then, really, what difference does it make who's brought in?
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 62,522
And1: 29,525
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

 

Post#17 » by paulpressey25 » Mon Mar 24, 2008 5:17 pm

Kohl has to do one of two things here:

a) Hire a bigger name than what is on that list (Walsh, Larry Brown, Kiki, etc)

or

b) Hire a guy on that list, but then move Ron Walter out of the organization and note that this new guy is taking his place.

We'd still have the Kohl meddling factor, but presumably this new guy would be over all the remaining employees except for Kohl. I could live with that. Anything where Ron Walter stays on in a role of influence or the new guy isn't made the #2 person behind Herb will be viewed by the fans as a failure.

The question that unfortunately wasn't asked of Herb at last week's press conference and should have been "Will this new person you hire be considered the #2 person in the organization not only in title but actual power?"
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,809
And1: 41,140
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

 

Post#18 » by emunney » Mon Mar 24, 2008 6:05 pm

Mark me down for John Hammond. You have to love what the Pistons have done. As with any hire, we can only hope he gets some slack from Kohl.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,555
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

 

Post#19 » by Buck You » Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:08 pm

I don't know who John Hammond is but if he has any hand in the pistons' success by drafting or whatever I'll take him.
User avatar
zizek
Senior
Posts: 614
And1: 0
Joined: May 14, 2005
Location: Madison

 

Post#20 » by zizek » Mon Mar 24, 2008 7:18 pm

With meddling on the front burner I wonder if a GM could be brought in with a bonus or golden parachute upon quitting in the contract that would triggered if Kohl vetoed too many trades.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks