europa wrote:Sessions is now averaging 10-11-5 in April. He's bumped his shooting percentage up to 42% which is much more respectable than it was a few games ago.
And 13 assists/game in 6 games as a starter.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
El Duderino wrote:One last thing we get to thank Larry Harris for is that six year deal to Charlie Bell.
Sessions is showing that at worst he should be a solid backup PG and now the role left for Bell is shrinking up to near designated bench pouter for next season, but we get the pleasure to pay him for five more seasons.
Yay
yiyiyi wrote:give rockets Redd ,houston give you T-MAC in return .please help rockets!
i dont want see that woman anymore !
steger_3434 wrote:Sessions better put up 18 and 10 because he's more than likely going to give up the same amount on the other end of the court. I really don't understand how so many people are in love with the guy. He's EXACTLY like any Bucks player in former years. Years that many of us want to forget and look forward to a brighter future.
He's an offensive force putting up huge stats in meaningless blowout losses all the while playing awful D.
Sure, bring up the fact he's a rookie, etc, but if he's a rookie and able to put up those offensive numbers, there is no reason he can't be a rookie and be at least decent on the defensive side of the ball.
I've moved on from this type of player. I used to love CV. His offensive game as a rookie left me wanting more. Little did I know that he was so horrid defensively that it didn't matter what he could do offensively. The same holds true for Redd. Once LH was fired and Hammonds took over I took over a different approach with this team. I don't care about offensive numbers. I care about how you look on the defensive side of the ball.
That is why the only guy worth keeping and getting excited over is Bogut in my opinion. He has elevated him game tremendously on the defensive end while playing good offense. I want two way players, not offensive guys that can't gaurd the Chris Duhons of the world.
steger_3434 wrote:Sessions better put up 18 and 10 because he's more than likely going to give up the same amount on the other end of the court. I really don't understand how so many people are in love with the guy. He's EXACTLY like any Bucks player in former years. Years that many of us want to forget and look forward to a brighter future.
He's an offensive force putting up huge stats in meaningless blowout losses all the while playing awful D.
Sure, bring up the fact he's a rookie, etc, but if he's a rookie and able to put up those offensive numbers, there is no reason he can't be a rookie and be at least decent on the defensive side of the ball.
I've moved on from this type of player. I used to love CV. His offensive game as a rookie left me wanting more. Little did I know that he was so horrid defensively that it didn't matter what he could do offensively. The same holds true for Redd. Once LH was fired and Hammonds took over I took over a different approach with this team. I don't care about offensive numbers. I care about how you look on the defensive side of the ball.
That is why the only guy worth keeping and getting excited over is Bogut in my opinion. He has elevated him game tremendously on the defensive end while playing good offense. I want two way players, not offensive guys that can't gaurd the Chris Duhons of the world.
beyond_the_arc wrote:For all the Mo fans, let's say Ramon is every bit as bad at defense as Mo. Given that idea, I'll take the PG who passes and sets up teammates and gets them the ball on time over a PG who only gives a damn about scoring. This does not take in contracts as the $ doesn't make the way the guy plays. Mo has NEVER been a PG and NEVER will be. Ramon already is, end of story.
lawry beard wrote:Does anyone else find it ironic that the only player in the NBA the bucks can shut down is Bogut?
Nebula1 wrote:It seems obvious to me that Villanueva is Ramon's favorite target and seems to have the games of Villanueva, Simmons, Mason, and to an extent, Bogut working much better. He's not quite on page with Redd yet, but give Ramon the weapons, and he'll use them. I'd be curious to see the stats for Villanueva and Simmons since Ramon's entry into the starting lineup.
Nice work for the rookie.
Anybody got a clip of his dunk?
lawry beard wrote:Does anyone else find it ironic that the only player in the NBA the bucks can shut down is Bogut?
steger_3434 wrote:Sessions better put up 18 and 10 because he's more than likely going to give up the same amount on the other end of the court. I really don't understand how so many people are in love with the guy. He's EXACTLY like any Bucks player in former years. Years that many of us want to forget and look forward to a brighter future.
He's an offensive force putting up huge stats in meaningless blowout losses all the while playing awful D.
Sure, bring up the fact he's a rookie, etc, but if he's a rookie and able to put up those offensive numbers, there is no reason he can't be a rookie and be at least decent on the defensive side of the ball.
I've moved on from this type of player. I used to love CV. His offensive game as a rookie left me wanting more. Little did I know that he was so horrid defensively that it didn't matter what he could do offensively. The same holds true for Redd. Once LH was fired and Hammonds took over I took over a different approach with this team. I don't care about offensive numbers. I care about how you look on the defensive side of the ball.
That is why the only guy worth keeping and getting excited over is Bogut in my opinion. He has elevated him game tremendously on the defensive end while playing good offense. I want two way players, not offensive guys that can't gaurd the Chris Duhons of the world.
lawry beard wrote:Does anyone else find it ironic that the only player in the NBA the bucks can shut down is Bogut?