Page 1 of 2

Player of the Game - Bucks vs Knicks (04/01)

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 2:48 am
by Serge28
Here are the nominees for tonight's game:

Image
Michael Redd: 36 points on 12-22 shooting from the field, 8-11 from the free throw line, and 4-9 from behind the arc, 6 rebounds, 9 assists, 2 steals, and 3 turnovers in 45 minutes. 13 second quarter points (3-4, 5-5, 2-2). 11 fourth quarter points (4-6, 2-4, 1-1).

Image
Bobby Simmons: 24 points on 9-14 shooting from the field, 5-6 from the charity stripe, and 1-3 from downtown, 6 rebounds, 1 assist, and 2 turnovers in 29 minutes.

Image
Andrew Bogut: 24 points on 9-14 shooting (6-8 from the line), 13 rebounds, 0 assists, 1 steal, and 5 turnovers in 40 minutes.

Image
Ramon Sessions: 4 points on 1-5 shooting (2-2 from the line), 4 rebounds, 6 assists, and 1 turnover in 34 minutes.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 2:53 am
by REDDzone
This was extremely tough because Redd was great, Simmons was great, Bogut great, and Sessions a pleasant surprise.

I gave it to Redd though, just because I tore him a new one in a thread today, and he went out and had a great all-around game tonight.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 2:53 am
by jeremyd236
redd

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 2:54 am
by europa
It's hard to ignore the huge contributions from Sessions and Simmons but Redd was nothing short of fantastic tonight. He deserves the honor.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:00 am
by Buck You
Simmons will NEVER have a game like this again. Vote goes to him. Buckskinsfan, what triggered this game? New found confidence? Hired a hooker last night?

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:02 am
by paul
It was Redd, but I gave Bobby the love cause he doesn't get much on here.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:21 am
by ryan7999
My vote went to Isiah Thomas for some inspired substitutions throughout the game.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:37 am
by magpies
Hate to say it but Simmons, got my vote but where did he pull that from

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:40 am
by Max Green
Image

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 3:45 am
by paulpressey25
How can you guys not vote Sessions?

The Knicks were shooting 60% and Crawford was going off until Sessions came in......

And I'll maintain Sessions made the final game winning play by blocking Q's shot at the buzzer.....

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 4:12 am
by Nebula1
Ramon = heart transplant.


Between him and Bogut, there might be legit fire for this squad in the future.Fire enough to light Redd.... I think so.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 5:28 am
by Wade-A-Holic
I'll take Sessions and his 6:1 assist to turnover ratio. Well done.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 5:31 am
by skones
Didn't watch the game, but did Sessions really look that good?

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 5:38 am
by Wade-A-Holic
skones wrote:Didn't watch the game, but did Sessions really look that good?


He was like Stockton to Malone all in one.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 5:42 am
by skones
Ramon Sessions > Chris Paul

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 12:28 pm
by Sigra
I didn't watch game yet (I will when I get home) but we don't win without Bogut and he had nice stats so it is Bogut for me.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 12:58 pm
by jeremyd236
paulpressey25 wrote:How can you guys not vote Sessions?

The Knicks were shooting 60% and Crawford was going off until Sessions came in......

And I'll maintain Sessions made the final game winning play by blocking Q's shot at the buzzer.....


Because not everyone here has hatred blinding us from reality. Redd is the player of the game, I don't understand how anyone could vote otherwise.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 1:05 pm
by emunney
...says the guy who was freaking out in the game thread because he was unable to watch the game.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 1:39 pm
by BuckFan25226
Redd, Simmons with a close 2nd.

Posted: Wed Apr 2, 2008 2:22 pm
by jeremyd236
emunney wrote:...says the guy who was freaking out in the game thread because he was unable to watch the game.


right, because if I had been able to see the game (my link stopped working halfway through the 3rd quarter), it probably would've made Redd's 36 points, 9 assists, 6 rebounds on over 50% shooting look worse