ImageImage

We wan't Terry Porter We wan't Terry Porter

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

BucksRuleAll22
Banned User
Posts: 1,342
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2007

We wan't Terry Porter We wan't Terry Porter 

Post#1 » by BucksRuleAll22 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:41 am

Bring him back :pray:
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 111,688
And1: 27,270
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#2 » by trwi7 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:48 am

No we don't. What's up with the apostrophies in want?
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 62,809
And1: 41,140
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

 

Post#3 » by emunney » Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:57 am

It's short for wall not.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
Bucks_Revenge
Banned User
Posts: 7,978
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 13, 2004

 

Post#4 » by Bucks_Revenge » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:05 am

uh whats the point of this thread...
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

 

Post#5 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:06 am

Bucks_Revenge wrote:uh whats the point of this thread...


He's giving you an opportunity to not look like the craziest person in a thread for once?
User avatar
jerrod
RealGM
Posts: 34,178
And1: 133
Joined: Aug 31, 2003
Location: The Berkeley of the midwest/ born with the intent/ to distress any government/ right of the left
     

 

Post#6 » by jerrod » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:07 am

emunney wrote:It's short for wall not.


i tried, but i couldn't come up with anything that contraction could stand for
Whiteman
Rookie
Posts: 1,078
And1: 212
Joined: Feb 05, 2006
Location: The Netherlands
 

 

Post#7 » by Whiteman » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:12 am

emunney wrote:It's short for wall not.

:clap:
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#8 » by skones » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:37 am

You're an idiot.
MajorDad
Banned User
Posts: 6,496
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 28, 2005

 

Post#9 » by MajorDad » Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:19 am

We wa not . thus: wan't. it's perfectly obvious to me.
User avatar
ReddManBogieMan
Senior
Posts: 722
And1: 0
Joined: May 02, 2007
Location: ReddMan's Funeral

 

Post#10 » by ReddManBogieMan » Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:20 am

Nobody wan'ts him. Even Ben Stiller in your avatar would'n't do that.
Image
User avatar
NotYoAvgNBAFan
Junior
Posts: 393
And1: 1
Joined: Feb 18, 2008

 

Post#11 » by NotYoAvgNBAFan » Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:28 am

Once again, a name I brought up a week ago on these very forums...

I would love to have Terry Porter come back here, but he won't and it would be too awkward.

You have more chance of Don Nelson returning or Del Harris then Terry Porter.

Kohl burned the very bridge he would have to take to walk back in town...

But personally I agree. Terry Porter NEVER SHOULD HAVE LEFT or been fired IN THE FIRST PLACE! :noway:

That is what is wrong with this team now! You talk about continuity and stability in players and you cant even keep a coach hired for more then 2 years!

You got it backwards. You should move the players and keep the coaches you had...
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#12 » by LUKE23 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:21 pm

Carlisle >>>> JVG >>>> Skiles >>>> LB >>>> a ton of other coaches >>>> Porter >>>> Stotts >>>> every remaining coach >>>> Krystkowiak
smooth 'lil balla
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,964
And1: 8
Joined: Nov 20, 2003

 

Post#13 » by smooth 'lil balla » Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:45 pm

trwi7 wrote: What's up with the apostrophies in want?



That's for starting out my day with an LOL. Funniest thing i've read in quite some time.

My Bucks comment for the day is, "KEEP REDD!"
User avatar
smauss
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,733
And1: 432
Joined: Jul 23, 2005
Contact:
     

 

Post#14 » by smauss » Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:56 pm

LUKE23 wrote:Carlisle >>>> JVG >>>> Skiles >>>> LB >>>> a ton of other coaches >>>> Porter >>>> Stotts >>>> every remaining coach >>>> Krystkowiak


:rofl:
Luke, I just wan't to congratulate you on this awe-inspiring post!I'm going out on a limb here but I don't think anyone will misinterpret that post.... :lol:
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan (CBQ is missed)

simul justus et peccator
BucksRuleAll22
Banned User
Posts: 1,342
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2007

 

Post#15 » by BucksRuleAll22 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:11 pm

Should go Carlisle , JVG, LB. Since its obvious none of those 3 coaches want to come coach for this mess of a team. I rather have Porter anyday over Skiles.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#16 » by LUKE23 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:13 pm

BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Should go Carlisle , JVG, LB. Since its obvious none of those 3 coaches want to come coach for this mess of a team. I rather have Porter anyday over Skiles.


We know, you've posted it in like 178 threads. Sadly you have yet to make a legitimate case as to why he's better (it's because he's not).
showtimesam
Veteran
Posts: 2,760
And1: 43
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: Wisconsin

 

Post#17 » by showtimesam » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:47 pm

If Kohl wasn't an idiot, we would've held onto Porter until his contract ran out and the team had some time to gel and then hired a clear upgrade instead of going the stotts route.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 101,982
And1: 55,054
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#18 » by MickeyDavis » Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:56 pm

It doesn't matter. Porter, Stotts, LK, none any good. Porter can't find another head coaching gig, no one else want's him either.
I'm against picketing but I don't know how to show it.
User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,752
And1: 6,957
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

 

Post#19 » by LUKE23 » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:14 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:It doesn't matter. Porter, Stotts, LK, none any good. Porter can't find another head coaching gig, no one else want's him either.


:lol:
User avatar
DocGonzo
Freshman
Posts: 56
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 20, 2008
Location: Sheboygan, WI

 

Post#20 » by DocGonzo » Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:39 pm

No one with any shred of integrity would return to an organization that publicly screwed him as badly as the Bucks did to Porter.
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks