Page 1 of 2

We wan't Terry Porter We wan't Terry Porter

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:41 am
by BucksRuleAll22
Bring him back :pray:

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:48 am
by trwi7
No we don't. What's up with the apostrophies in want?

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:57 am
by emunney
It's short for wall not.

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:05 am
by Bucks_Revenge
uh whats the point of this thread...

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:06 am
by NeedsMoreCheese
Bucks_Revenge wrote:uh whats the point of this thread...


He's giving you an opportunity to not look like the craziest person in a thread for once?

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:07 am
by jerrod
emunney wrote:It's short for wall not.


i tried, but i couldn't come up with anything that contraction could stand for

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:12 am
by Whiteman
emunney wrote:It's short for wall not.

:clap:

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:37 am
by skones
You're an idiot.

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:19 am
by MajorDad
We wa not . thus: wan't. it's perfectly obvious to me.

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 8:20 am
by ReddManBogieMan
Nobody wan'ts him. Even Ben Stiller in your avatar would'n't do that.

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 10:28 am
by NotYoAvgNBAFan
Once again, a name I brought up a week ago on these very forums...

I would love to have Terry Porter come back here, but he won't and it would be too awkward.

You have more chance of Don Nelson returning or Del Harris then Terry Porter.

Kohl burned the very bridge he would have to take to walk back in town...

But personally I agree. Terry Porter NEVER SHOULD HAVE LEFT or been fired IN THE FIRST PLACE! :noway:

That is what is wrong with this team now! You talk about continuity and stability in players and you cant even keep a coach hired for more then 2 years!

You got it backwards. You should move the players and keep the coaches you had...

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:21 pm
by LUKE23
Carlisle >>>> JVG >>>> Skiles >>>> LB >>>> a ton of other coaches >>>> Porter >>>> Stotts >>>> every remaining coach >>>> Krystkowiak

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:45 pm
by smooth 'lil balla
trwi7 wrote: What's up with the apostrophies in want?



That's for starting out my day with an LOL. Funniest thing i've read in quite some time.

My Bucks comment for the day is, "KEEP REDD!"

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:56 pm
by smauss
LUKE23 wrote:Carlisle >>>> JVG >>>> Skiles >>>> LB >>>> a ton of other coaches >>>> Porter >>>> Stotts >>>> every remaining coach >>>> Krystkowiak


:rofl:
Luke, I just wan't to congratulate you on this awe-inspiring post!I'm going out on a limb here but I don't think anyone will misinterpret that post.... :lol:

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:11 pm
by BucksRuleAll22
Should go Carlisle , JVG, LB. Since its obvious none of those 3 coaches want to come coach for this mess of a team. I rather have Porter anyday over Skiles.

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:13 pm
by LUKE23
BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Should go Carlisle , JVG, LB. Since its obvious none of those 3 coaches want to come coach for this mess of a team. I rather have Porter anyday over Skiles.


We know, you've posted it in like 178 threads. Sadly you have yet to make a legitimate case as to why he's better (it's because he's not).

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:47 pm
by showtimesam
If Kohl wasn't an idiot, we would've held onto Porter until his contract ran out and the team had some time to gel and then hired a clear upgrade instead of going the stotts route.

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 5:56 pm
by MickeyDavis
It doesn't matter. Porter, Stotts, LK, none any good. Porter can't find another head coaching gig, no one else want's him either.

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:14 pm
by LUKE23
MickeyDavis wrote:It doesn't matter. Porter, Stotts, LK, none any good. Porter can't find another head coaching gig, no one else want's him either.


:lol:

Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:39 pm
by DocGonzo
No one with any shred of integrity would return to an organization that publicly screwed him as badly as the Bucks did to Porter.