ImageImage

Woelfel on WSSP: Bucks to keep Sessions

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

mjh91
Banned User
Posts: 70
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 04, 2009

Re: Woelfel on WSSP: Bucks to keep Sessions 

Post#241 » by mjh91 » Wed Feb 11, 2009 5:14 pm

Sigra wrote:
LUKE23 wrote:
I'm dead set against moving first round picks, especially when overall I don't consider us brimming with young talent overall, but this is the order I would go:

1. Look to move RJ for any expiring at all costs, doesn't matter what else is coming back with it
2. If we can't move RJ for an expiring, I look to move Ridnour for an expiring
3. If we can't move Ridnour for an expiring, then I would consider Gadz/1st for an expiring
4. If #3 isn't an option, then I reluctantly look to move CV in a Landry type deal (this option doesn't really excite me, as I'm not a big fan of undersized hustle PF's like Landry/Haslem/etc), but it's solid value for the contract.
5. #5 would be letting him walk for no compensation


Considering that Redd can't be traded, this is my order if I am Hammond:

1. Look to move Gadz and 1st round pick (no protection at all) for any expiring
2. Look to move Ridnour for an expiring
3. Look to move combination of Bell, Alexander, Allen for an expiring
4. Look to move RJ for expiring (with tear in my eye)
5. Trade CV for Landry or something like that
6. Quit/Resign (if I am not capable to do any of above then I should not be GM period)


That doesn't kill our chemistry at all.
User avatar
tedbrogen
Analyst
Posts: 3,282
And1: 2,827
Joined: Jun 20, 2008

Re: Woelfel on WSSP: Bucks to keep Sessions 

Post#242 » by tedbrogen » Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:55 am

Let's say they stupidly stand pat so they can lose to the Celtics in 5 games in the first round, or barely miss the playoffs - can they even afford to resign Sessions this offseason? Even if they let CV walk, would they still be able to afford Sessions?

Return to Milwaukee Bucks