DH34Phan wrote:Jon Hammond probably made the right decision picking Joe Alexander.
Don't try to argue me!!!!!!!!!!!
Of course he did. JA will probably be the best rookie of his draft class.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
DH34Phan wrote:Jon Hammond probably made the right decision picking Joe Alexander.
Don't try to argue me!!!!!!!!!!!
yiyiyi wrote:give rockets Redd ,houston give you T-MAC in return .please help rockets!
i dont want see that woman anymore !
carmelbrownqueen wrote:midranger wrote:It's your argument. I'm not comfortable with it. You apparently are.
Throw the word "probably" in a any sentence and one can speak with impunity.
Sure, if you say so....
midranger wrote:I'm well aware that Bogut's playoff performance in 2006 probably earns him an A+.
DH34Phan wrote:Jon Hammond probably made the right decision picking Joe Alexander.
Don't try to argue me!!!!!!!!!!!
EastSideBucksFan wrote:CBQ - I wouldn't even waste the time to argue with these yahoos. They have no tact and are just arguing just to argue. It's lame, petty, childish, and pointless in my opinion and just fills this board with useless drivel of people trying to drive home points just to "be right".
Sure, this is a Bucks board and any statement is public knowledge and everyone on here has the right to refute anything said on here as this is the point of the board.
But there is such a thing called tact and plenty of posters clearly don't understand this.
They are plain just being a$$holes.
EastSideBucksFan wrote:
But there is such a thing called tact and plenty of posters clearly don't understand this.
midranger wrote:carmelbrownqueen wrote:midranger wrote:It's your argument. I'm not comfortable with it. You apparently are.
Throw the word "probably" in a any sentence and one can speak with impunity.
Sure, if you say so....
No....... YOU said so.
carmelbrownqueen wrote:I wasn't wrong.. I said they are "probably" not happy. There is no statement of fact ergo no misrepresentation.
midranger wrote:carmelbrownqueen wrote:I wasn't wrong.. I said they are "probably" not happy. There is no statement of fact ergo no misrepresentation.
People do know that what they write here can be viewed by other posters right?
midranger wrote:EastSideBucksFan wrote:
But there is such a thing called tact and plenty of posters clearly don't understand this.
I agree. A simple apology would have gone a long way.
midranger wrote:CBQ, I'm well aware that you're probably not stupid, but you are acting like it right now.
I agree I sent too much time responding to anything you wrote.. it wasn't worth it, good point.LUKE23 wrote:For someone who "doesn't care what certain people have to say" you're certainly taking a lot of time responding to these people. That doesn't make much sense to me. But it's no big deal. You seem to get extremely defensive when people disagree with you, even though that is the point of this forum, debate/discussion. Ah well, no biggie.
II agree I sent too much time responding to anything you wrote.. it wasn't worth it, you're right on that.
That wasn't an angry response it was more sarcasm..LUKE23 wrote:II agree I sent too much time responding to anything you wrote.. it wasn't worth it, you're right on that.
Why get so angry? It's only a message board.
Stopshere2 wrote:Tedious wankers. The ghost of Epi's semanticism lives on. None of you 'debaters' hold the high ground as you grind this thread into the dirt.
I want to see people's opinions on Bogut, not a "he said, she said."
So, do a poll on who was right and f/off from this thread ... please.