Norseman79 wrote:I voted no, but it's because I am concerned about the depth we lost. People can say that Nowell and Jordan M will be fine, but they haven't proven that over a long stretch of games yet.
Yes and no.I dont think that we lost much depth, at least not in playoffs. On paper we lost three rotational players: Beasley, Vanderbilt, Beverley (plus Bolmaro, Kessler as prospects). But Beasley was non factor in playoffs 8.2ppg, on 42% FG, 32% from 3pt, Vando was unplayable, Beverley was good, but there is always a chance that he fouls too much or gets injured.
We added Gobert, Anderson, Moore. We keep MCD, TP, Nowell and Reid. I believe that we have just enough depth, but now we have much more size and defensive talent. As for shooting, we might actually benefit from Gobert rim gravity, who often help perimeter player to get extra spacing.
Norseman79 wrote:I
Warriors back and healthy, Nuggets back and healthy, Suns as of now, and Clippers back and healthy... I'm not saying that I think those teams are for sure better than the wolves, but until we see everything comes together, I personally can't put them above them, not to mention Dallas has improved, Portland is improved, Memphis didn't get worse and I'm sure there's other teams I'm spacing out on. The wolves have the potential to be a top four team for sure, but depth is concerning
Yes and no. Nuggets get Murray, but lost Campazzo and Morris. GSW just had another season of 100+ games, their core players have big mileage. LAC gets back Kawhi, but I'd never trust his health. Dallas is going to lose Brunson, POR has talent, but little chemistry and unproven coach. MEM are the same.