ImageImageImage

The Eric Paschall Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,047
And1: 5,687
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Eric Paschall Thread 

Post#101 » by winforlose » Wed Oct 19, 2022 10:58 pm

IceManBK1 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Read on Twitter


Can we still sign Derrick favors? A bigger of who can reb and def would be a solid pickup.


Yes and no. You need to cut Knight. Sign Knight back to the two way, then sign Favors to Knights spot.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,283
And1: 19,293
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Eric Paschall Thread 

Post#102 » by shrink » Thu Oct 20, 2022 3:08 am

winforlose wrote:
IceManBK1 wrote:Can we still sign Derrick favors? A bigger of who can reb and def would be a solid pickup.


Yes and no. You need to cut Knight. Sign Knight back to the two way, then sign Favors to Knights spot.


IceMan, only players with four years NBA experience or less are eligible for two-way deals, according to the CBA. That’s why the Wolves would have to do something like winforlose wrote. To legally bring in a vet like Favors, we’d need to give him a legitimate contract.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,703
And1: 22,273
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Eric Paschall Thread 

Post#103 » by Klomp » Thu Oct 20, 2022 4:43 pm

Read on Twitter


Essentially echoed what Jon said
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
wolves_89
General Manager
Posts: 8,103
And1: 4,585
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: The Eric Paschall Thread 

Post#104 » by wolves_89 » Thu Oct 20, 2022 9:42 pm

I am wondering how the Wolves will use the open two-way spot. I am guessing the team wouldn't have waived Paschall without having a replacement lined up.
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,047
And1: 5,687
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: The Eric Paschall Thread 

Post#105 » by winforlose » Thu Oct 20, 2022 9:47 pm

wolves_89 wrote:I am wondering how the Wolves will use the open two-way spot. I am guessing the team wouldn't have waived Paschall without having a replacement lined up.


Given that it has been around 23+ hours since the announcement and no one has been signed, I think that is exactly what happened. I don’t know if he asked out or we fired him, but something funky went down. Normally with this type of thing you would expect to hear that he was cleared to sign X. The same way Lawson was cleared to sign Garza.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,703
And1: 22,273
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Eric Paschall Thread 

Post#106 » by Klomp » Thu Oct 20, 2022 9:52 pm

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves