ImageImageImage

The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,691
And1: 22,255
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#21 » by Klomp » Fri Jun 16, 2023 8:17 pm

Klomp wrote:

Cliff notes from Segment 1: I think he likes the group as constructed, so not sure we should expect mega changes, but emotional maturity was the key to the 2022-23 season.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Biff Cooper
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,726
And1: 309
Joined: Jan 02, 2009
Location: Northern Minnesota
 

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#22 » by Biff Cooper » Tue Jun 20, 2023 3:53 pm

Barreiro didn't hit him up with too hard of questions. Good stuff though. I kind of get the "feeling" our ownership is willing to go into the lux tax this season to re-sign Naz, NAW, a MLE free agent, and possibly even Nowell.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,001
And1: 6,016
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#23 » by Devilzsidewalk » Tue Jun 20, 2023 5:34 pm

Biff Cooper wrote:Barreiro didn't hit him up with too hard of questions. Good stuff though. I kind of get the "feeling" our ownership is willing to go into the lux tax this season to re-sign Naz, NAW, a MLE free agent, and possibly even Nowell.


If they feel like they sidestep the financial crunch, then I'm not vehemently opposed to letting it ride one more year to see what happens. I'd still hope they would at least send out strong feelers to gauge what's possible for a KAT, or maybe even a Gobert trade. Also not sure how they'd talk Naz into coming back, but it'd be great. At the start of the year though when everyone was healthy, Naz could barely even get on the court some nights. If you could do something like that Sixers fan suggested - Melton for SloMo - then the roster makes a bit more sense. Or move Prince and play SloMo at SF a lot more, but that's a perimeter defense waiting to be exploited.

I guess we'll have to see, but I still think a KAT move makes the most sense for both financial and roster construction reasons. I'm completely comfortable with a Gobert/Naz/SloMo trio for the frontcourt. Naz/Jaden/Ant the long-term pieces, so just need a long-term PF and PG prospect. Blazers, Hornets, and Rockets are all teams in flux for a variety of reasons, and have some potential prospects and picks that could fill those holes. If they're being hard asses and won't negotiate fair deals, then I understand running it back. But if you can get a little bit of a bidding war going and get a nice return, I think we should strike now.
Image
Biff Cooper
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,726
And1: 309
Joined: Jan 02, 2009
Location: Northern Minnesota
 

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#24 » by Biff Cooper » Tue Jun 20, 2023 8:09 pm

Devilzsidewalk wrote:I guess we'll have to see, but I still think a KAT move makes the most sense for both financial and roster construction reasons.


Obviously, the roster as constructed is far too heavy at talent, salary, and playing time at the center position. If we re-sign Naz to a significant contract, it does not improve that situation. I just have trouble envisioning anything that makes sense for both the Timberwolves and the opponents.
TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,973
And1: 3,005
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#25 » by TimberKat » Tue Jun 20, 2023 8:21 pm

Biff Cooper wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:I guess we'll have to see, but I still think a KAT move makes the most sense for both financial and roster construction reasons.


Obviously, the roster as constructed is far too heavy at talent, salary, and playing time at the center position. If we re-sign Naz to a significant contract, it does not improve that situation. I just have trouble envisioning anything that makes sense for both the Timberwolves and the opponents.

We have to get off the center mindset. Naz is a power forward. Towns is a in-between guy (I supposed that is how he changed the game). Gobert is the only true (or limited to) center. Naz is a backup and a good one. There is no team that will paid Naz as a starter. He is still below Zubac.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,691
And1: 22,255
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#26 » by Klomp » Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:26 pm

It's easy for people to get too caught up on instantly reacting to a move and end up unfairly judging it prematurely. Everyone hated the Michael Porter Jr extension when it happened, but I don't think anyone is saying it's a negative contract any longer.

This is why I wouldn't rule out Minnesota ponying up the money for Reid, for example. I think there will immediately be skeptics at how much he may get paid, but over the life of the deal I wouldn't worry about the 23-year old proving his worth.

A 27-year old Bobby Portis signed a 4/48 deal in 2022 as a backup big in Milwaukee (roughly 9% of cap, starting at $10,843,350). That cap percentage equates to around $12.25M starting point for Reid, which I actually feel would be a little bit of a lowball for the 23-year old.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,280
And1: 19,286
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#27 » by shrink » Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:35 pm

Klomp wrote:It's easy for people to get too caught up on instantly reacting to a move and end up unfairly judging it prematurely. Everyone hated the Michael Porter Jr extension when it happened, but I don't think anyone is saying it's a negative contract any longer.

This is why I wouldn't rule out Minnesota ponying up the money for Reid, for example. I think there will immediately be skeptics at how much he may get paid, but over the life of the deal I wouldn't worry about the 23-year old proving his worth.

It’s especially true for Connelly.

The impression he had as a GM for years was that he was one of the best at identifying talent, but his knock was that he got too attached to his players, kept them around too long and overpaid them a bit on their second deals.

I wonder if the success of DEN with its stability makes people no longer see his knock as a bad thing. In any regard, for those that want Naz back, he’s more likely to do it than most GMs, which matches up with everything we hear, about working all year to try to get him to stay.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,280
And1: 19,286
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#28 » by shrink » Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:38 pm

TimberKat wrote:
Biff Cooper wrote:
Devilzsidewalk wrote:I guess we'll have to see, but I still think a KAT move makes the most sense for both financial and roster construction reasons.


Obviously, the roster as constructed is far too heavy at talent, salary, and playing time at the center position. If we re-sign Naz to a significant contract, it does not improve that situation. I just have trouble envisioning anything that makes sense for both the Timberwolves and the opponents.

We have to get off the center mindset. Naz is a power forward.

Are we sure about that? Can he guard today’s PFs?

In his three previous seasons, his numbers when he played alongside a center were very bad. This year, he had a good run in the games at the end of the season, and his body is certainly lighter, but I’m still on the fence about calling him a PF. Hopefully people can convince me.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,691
And1: 22,255
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#29 » by Klomp » Wed Jun 21, 2023 7:23 pm

shrink wrote:Are we sure about that? Can he guard today’s PFs?

In his three previous seasons, his numbers when he played alongside a center were very bad. This year, he had a good run in the games at the end of the season, and his body is certainly lighter, but I’m still on the fence about calling him a PF. Hopefully people can convince me.

I think this goes back to the prematurely judging thing...

For one thing, adjusting to such a big weight change can be difficult. I know it wasn't immediate, but he lost 30-40 pounds over time. That changes how a player moves, and even though it's a change for the better it still commands an adjustment period.

Add to that the change in defense. I don't want any overarching decisions to be made based on the first month of the season. We saw growth as the year went on, and what we saw at the end from him should be the closest to what we should expect from him at PF in this defensive system.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,691
And1: 22,255
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#30 » by Klomp » Wed Jun 21, 2023 7:26 pm

Klomp wrote:Cliff notes from Segment 1: I think he likes the group as constructed, so not sure we should expect mega changes, but emotional maturity was the key to the 2022-23 season.

In today's predraft press scrum, Connelly noted that maturity and age aren't necessarily tied together.

Note: This wasn't in regards to Towns. He was talking about the difference between drafting more experienced college players late in the draft while the first round usually has a lot of college freshmen.

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,973
And1: 3,005
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#31 » by TimberKat » Wed Jun 21, 2023 7:46 pm

Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:Are we sure about that? Can he guard today’s PFs?

In his three previous seasons, his numbers when he played alongside a center were very bad. This year, he had a good run in the games at the end of the season, and his body is certainly lighter, but I’m still on the fence about calling him a PF. Hopefully people can convince me.

I think this goes back to the prematurely judging thing...

For one thing, adjusting to such a big weight change can be difficult. I know it wasn't immediate, but he lost 30-40 pounds over time. That changes how a player moves, and even though it's a change for the better it still commands an adjustment period.

Add to that the change in defense. I don't want any overarching decisions to be made based on the first month of the season. We saw growth as the year went on, and what we saw at the end from him should be the closest to what we should expect from him at PF in this defensive system.

I see Naz had a hard time guarding centers in his new weight class. I supposed we can view him as backup center and Towns full time at pfd. If all 3 are centers than someone is going to get traded. Really depends on how Finch wants to work the rotation - Towns/Gobert mostly same time or least same time. Naz will be one the floor with Gobert or Towns accordingly.
BlacJacMac
Analyst
Posts: 3,576
And1: 3,269
Joined: Aug 25, 2020
       

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#32 » by BlacJacMac » Wed Jun 21, 2023 7:50 pm

Klomp wrote:It's easy for people to get too caught up on instantly reacting to a move and end up unfairly judging it prematurely. Everyone hated the Michael Porter Jr extension when it happened, but I don't think anyone is saying it's a negative contract any longer.


I do. If he's not hitting jumpers, he's really quite horrible. They won the finals despite him.

My guess is he's the guy that Denver tries to dump on an unsuspecting franchise as their salary continues to grow.
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 555
And1: 300
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#33 » by fattymcgee » Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:44 pm

BlacJacMac wrote:
Klomp wrote:It's easy for people to get too caught up on instantly reacting to a move and end up unfairly judging it prematurely. Everyone hated the Michael Porter Jr extension when it happened, but I don't think anyone is saying it's a negative contract any longer.


I do. If he's not hitting jumpers, he's really quite horrible. They won the finals despite him.

My guess is he's the guy that Denver tries to dump on an unsuspecting franchise as their salary continues to grow.


I don't know if I go so far to call him horrible, but he's definitely not worth a max contract.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,280
And1: 19,286
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#34 » by shrink » Wed Jun 21, 2023 9:51 pm

Klomp wrote:
shrink wrote:Are we sure about that? Can he guard today’s PFs?

In his three previous seasons, his numbers when he played alongside a center were very bad. This year, he had a good run in the games at the end of the season, and his body is certainly lighter, but I’m still on the fence about calling him a PF. Hopefully people can convince me.

I think this goes back to the prematurely judging thing...

For one thing, adjusting to such a big weight change can be difficult. I know it wasn't immediate, but he lost 30-40 pounds over time. That changes how a player moves, and even though it's a change for the better it still commands an adjustment period.

Add to that the change in defense. I don't want any overarching decisions to be made based on the first month of the season. We saw growth as the year went on, and what we saw at the end from him should be the closest to what we should expect from him at PF in this defensive system.

I heard today that in a few hundred minutes with Gobert, the pair had a -10 Net Rtg.

I agree that this year his body is different, and I would never count against Naz’ work ethic to learn to become a PF. But right now, I don’t think he is a PF, or at least, a successful PF.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,582
And1: 5,085
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: The Tim Connelly Model: From Denver to Minnesota 

Post#35 » by minimus » Thu Jun 22, 2023 1:01 pm

I wonder how many ex DEN players around NBA have good connection with TC, and might come here via trade or FA market:

Monte Morris
Bones Hyland
PJ Dozier
???


Forgot about Beasley and Vanderbilt lol

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves