ImageImageImage

Game 50: Kings (24-24) @ Wolves (27-22)

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,662
And1: 22,229
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Game 50: Kings (24-24) @ Wolves (27-22) 

Post#101 » by Klomp » Tue Feb 4, 2025 7:53 pm

shrink wrote:I’ll go even farther. I like our top three bigs, and those three are better than most team’s top three. However, we can’t afford to lose a single one, or this team is in trouble.

This is absolutely true. This is why Finch is so reliant on the "top eight" as a whole too....because there is such a big drop-off.

And I think it's important to remember in any Randle trade discussion is that Randle is the team's secondary creator as the team's starting PF. Like it or not, that is Finch's system. Look at the last 2.5 years....Towns, Randle, Reid and Anderson all operated as the team's secondary creator when they are on the floor. That's something we all need to be reminded of when looking at the team. Maybe that changes in the offseason, but you can't realistically expect it to change overnight mid-season. So anyone we trade for this week if Randle is outgoing probably has to fill part of that role.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,154
And1: 1,883
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Game 50: Kings (24-24) @ Wolves (27-22) 

Post#102 » by Note30 » Tue Feb 4, 2025 7:54 pm

younggunsmn wrote:We're done. Not just now but for the next 7 years at least.
It's only going to get worse as the teams that didn't trade away all their future assets keep getting better and better.
It's 2005 repeating itself all over again.

Kings at the end of a 2 week road trip and just traded away their best player.

We're not only going to miss the playoffs, we're going to finish below .500, calling it now.

When your 1st year player on a 2 way is the only guy on the entire team intelligent enough to keep the ballhandler off of the spot they want to get to you have a team full of really dumb players.
Anthony Edwards got hunted mercilessly all game long.
The got to the middle of the paint easy peasy all game long, it was ridiculous.



We are completely **** for 3 years. We can semi-tank in 2027-2028.

2028-Our own pick,2029 and 2031-no pick, 2030-Swap.

We can't get off Rudy's contract until the end of 27/28 season - not to mention it's going to pretty untradeable.

Honestly we may have to trade Ant in the 27/28 season to start a full rebuild.

We just don't have the assets or cap space, and our ability to hit FAs is not going to from signing PJ Dozier to being able to suddenly attract Giannis.

Start fresh in 2027/2028 and bleed for two to three years after.

Can we finally all agree TC is a terrible GM or are we just going to keep pretending we're doing amazing, and the moves that led us here were also great?

In the interim, trade Randle and all the other useless **** for any win now talent that expires at the end of the 2027 season. Be completely clean on the cap sheets except Rudy and Ant by the begining of the 2027/2028 season.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,662
And1: 22,229
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Game 50: Kings (24-24) @ Wolves (27-22) 

Post#103 » by Klomp » Tue Feb 4, 2025 7:57 pm

Note30 wrote:Can we finally all agree TC is a terrible GM or are we just going to keep pretending we're doing amazing, and the moves that led us here were also great?

I would rather be where we are today than where we were from 2004-2022.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,154
And1: 1,883
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Game 50: Kings (24-24) @ Wolves (27-22) 

Post#104 » by Note30 » Tue Feb 4, 2025 8:00 pm

Klomp wrote:
Note30 wrote:Can we finally all agree TC is a terrible GM or are we just going to keep pretending we're doing amazing, and the moves that led us here were also great?

I would rather be where we are today than where we were from 2004-2022.


We're not really in a different spot, this is the same ****. We're literally maybe 5-8 games ahead of most of those seasons. (except the truly hardcore terrible ones)

But I know you will always be an apologist for any FO no matter what so I'm kinda wasting my breath.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,662
And1: 22,229
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Game 50: Kings (24-24) @ Wolves (27-22) 

Post#105 » by Klomp » Tue Feb 4, 2025 8:05 pm

Note30 wrote:
Klomp wrote:
Note30 wrote:Can we finally all agree TC is a terrible GM or are we just going to keep pretending we're doing amazing, and the moves that led us here were also great?

I would rather be where we are today than where we were from 2004-2022.


We're not really in a different spot, this is the same ****. We're literally maybe 5-8 games ahead of most of those seasons. (except the truly hardcore terrible ones)

But I know you will always be an apologist for any FO no matter what so I'm kinda wasting my breath.

The low 40s win totals were the ceilings for those groups. To date, that "same ****" has been the floors for this regime. That's absolutely a different spot.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
RealGM
Posts: 13,038
And1: 5,683
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: Game 50: Kings (24-24) @ Wolves (27-22) 

Post#106 » by winforlose » Tue Feb 4, 2025 8:21 pm

Note30 wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:We're done. Not just now but for the next 7 years at least.
It's only going to get worse as the teams that didn't trade away all their future assets keep getting better and better.
It's 2005 repeating itself all over again.

Kings at the end of a 2 week road trip and just traded away their best player.

We're not only going to miss the playoffs, we're going to finish below .500, calling it now.

When your 1st year player on a 2 way is the only guy on the entire team intelligent enough to keep the ballhandler off of the spot they want to get to you have a team full of really dumb players.
Anthony Edwards got hunted mercilessly all game long.
The got to the middle of the paint easy peasy all game long, it was ridiculous.



We are completely **** for 3 years. We can semi-tank in 2027-2028.

2028-Our own pick,2029 and 2031-no pick, 2030-Swap.

We can't get off Rudy's contract until the end of 27/28 season - not to mention it's going to pretty untradeable.

Honestly we may have to trade Ant in the 27/28 season to start a full rebuild.

We just don't have the assets or cap space, and our ability to hit FAs is not going to from signing PJ Dozier to being able to suddenly attract Giannis.

Start fresh in 2027/2028 and bleed for two to three years after.

Can we finally all agree TC is a terrible GM or are we just going to keep pretending we're doing amazing, and the moves that led us here were also great?

In the interim, trade Randle and all the other useless **** for any win now talent that expires at the end of the 2027 season. Be completely clean on the cap sheets except Rudy and Ant by the begining of the 2027/2028 season.


I think you are correct that TC is a horrible GM, and I think that he has done us serious harm with the KAT trade. That said I disagree with much of the rest of your analysis.

1. Ant is not even 24, (his birthday is in August.) Ant will of course get better.
2. Jaden has just delivered back to back 22+ point games. His shooting is inconsistent from deep, but he is getting to the line and making his free throws. Jaden also happens to be 24 and not in his prime. Oh, and his rebounding is up to 5.4 per game, and climbing. For a SF, that is excellent, and I would not be surprised to see that number at 6 or 6.5 this season and 7 or higher next season.
3. Naz just dropped 30 last night. His offense is excellent even without a proper PG. Imagine him with one. Remember how much JMAC made an impact on Naz. When Dilly develops you may well have that again.
4. Gobert is very tradable on his new deal. I can think of 6 teams off hand including the Rockets, Thunder, Pels, and Knicks who would want him. I do agree we should trade him, but that new contract isn’t as poisonous as you make it sound.
5. DDV has it in him to be a 6th man of the year. His shooting and attacking skills are very real. His defense is above average, and his age is only 28 (just turned,) which means he has 3 or 4 more years in his prime. You caught a glimpse of his upside before the injury.
6. Dilly and Shannon both have high upside. Don’t get lost in the rookie season of it all. Shannon could replace NAW sooner than you think, and Dilly could be the love child of Garland and Kyrie. Of course they may both flop, but it is way to early to write them off.

You also forget that the cap is increasing every year by 10%. In 2026 we could easily have enough space to bring in someone of value, just not at 50+. Then again, max contracts are becoming less common. Good quality players will be pushed into the 30s, and that is something we will be able to afford if not in 26/27, then in 27/28. This team still has a ton of upside and time will help. We are from blow it up and start, over. Which is great because we don’t control our picks except for 28, until 2032.
TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,970
And1: 3,002
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Game 50: Kings (24-24) @ Wolves (27-22) 

Post#107 » by TimberKat » Tue Feb 4, 2025 10:46 pm

This is one of those games that "I am not mad at the Wolves, just disappointed".

This is the pattern now, we just fall short by 2 pts no matter the circumstances. The biggest reason in my opinion is the drop off at point guard play, even more so than Towns trade. Conley too old, Dilly too young, DDV hurt, NAW sucked, Point Ant makes everyone stands.

If we fix the PG situation, we win 4 more in the last 6 loss.
younggunsmn
Head Coach
Posts: 6,739
And1: 2,566
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Game 50: Kings (24-24) @ Wolves (27-22) 

Post#108 » by younggunsmn » Wed Feb 5, 2025 10:58 pm

winforlose wrote:
Note30 wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:We're done. Not just now but for the next 7 years at least.
It's only going to get worse as the teams that didn't trade away all their future assets keep getting better and better.
It's 2005 repeating itself all over again.

Kings at the end of a 2 week road trip and just traded away their best player.

We're not only going to miss the playoffs, we're going to finish below .500, calling it now.

When your 1st year player on a 2 way is the only guy on the entire team intelligent enough to keep the ballhandler off of the spot they want to get to you have a team full of really dumb players.
Anthony Edwards got hunted mercilessly all game long.
The got to the middle of the paint easy peasy all game long, it was ridiculous.



We are completely **** for 3 years. We can semi-tank in 2027-2028.

2028-Our own pick,2029 and 2031-no pick, 2030-Swap.

We can't get off Rudy's contract until the end of 27/28 season - not to mention it's going to pretty untradeable.

Honestly we may have to trade Ant in the 27/28 season to start a full rebuild.

We just don't have the assets or cap space, and our ability to hit FAs is not going to from signing PJ Dozier to being able to suddenly attract Giannis.

Start fresh in 2027/2028 and bleed for two to three years after.

Can we finally all agree TC is a terrible GM or are we just going to keep pretending we're doing amazing, and the moves that led us here were also great?

In the interim, trade Randle and all the other useless **** for any win now talent that expires at the end of the 2027 season. Be completely clean on the cap sheets except Rudy and Ant by the begining of the 2027/2028 season.


I think you are correct that TC is a horrible GM, and I think that he has done us serious harm with the KAT trade. That said I disagree with much of the rest of your analysis.

1. Ant is not even 24, (his birthday is in August.) Ant will of course get better.
2. Jaden has just delivered back to back 22+ point games. His shooting is inconsistent from deep, but he is getting to the line and making his free throws. Jaden also happens to be 24 and not in his prime. Oh, and his rebounding is up to 5.4 per game, and climbing. For a SF, that is excellent, and I would not be surprised to see that number at 6 or 6.5 this season and 7 or higher next season.
3. Naz just dropped 30 last night. His offense is excellent even without a proper PG. Imagine him with one. Remember how much JMAC made an impact on Naz. When Dilly develops you may well have that again.
4. Gobert is very tradable on his new deal. I can think of 6 teams off hand including the Rockets, Thunder, Pels, and Knicks who would want him. I do agree we should trade him, but that new contract isn’t as poisonous as you make it sound.
5. DDV has it in him to be a 6th man of the year. His shooting and attacking skills are very real. His defense is above average, and his age is only 28 (just turned,) which means he has 3 or 4 more years in his prime. You caught a glimpse of his upside before the injury.
6. Dilly and Shannon both have high upside. Don’t get lost in the rookie season of it all. Shannon could replace NAW sooner than you think, and Dilly could be the love child of Garland and Kyrie. Of course they may both flop, but it is way to early to write them off.

You also forget that the cap is increasing every year by 10%. In 2026 we could easily have enough space to bring in someone of value, just not at 50+. Then again, max contracts are becoming less common. Good quality players will be pushed into the 30s, and that is something we will be able to afford if not in 26/27, then in 27/28. This team still has a ton of upside and time will help. We are from blow it up and start, over. Which is great because we don’t control our picks except for 28, until 2032.



1. We realistically have about 2 more seasons after this one before Ant has the leverage to start forcing his way out.
2. I'll give you Jaden's improvement the last 2 months has been the lone bright spot.
3. Naz will be an unrestricted free agent this summer and if Julius opts in there is no way we can re-sign him without going into the tax.
4. NOBODY WANTS GOBERTS CONTRACT BUT US. If he were a car he would be a model from the '70s that nobody makes any more.
37 mil a year for a defense only player is unpalatable for anyone in this era.
5. DDV his a nice role player on a nice contract that we only have under contract for 2 years after this one, which is realistically one more season before we have to make a decision on whether we want to trade him for value or lose him for nothing.

Fast Forward to summer 2027:
Ant 2 years remaining on his deal and teams circling like sharks for a trade opportunity.
Jaden 2 years remaining
Naz gone for nothing
Julius gone for nothing
DDV unrestricted FA and gone for nothing
Gobert 38 million player option and just turned 35.
Dilly and Shannon in the final year of their rookie deals and either flopped or are about to get expensive.

25 and 27 first round picks lost to Utah and 26 possibly swapped (looks like it will only be possible within the top 8 though).

And other business factors:
New ownership who didn't buy the team at 1/25th of what its now worth who may or may not want to pay ANY luxury tax.
Region Sports Network contract over/broken and the revenue from that substantially less than it is now.
Cap only increased 4% last year. Ant and Jaden's raises are 8%. It's not going up 10% every single year.

The team in a couple years is basically going to be Ant, Jaden, Dilly, Shannon, an old Gobert and whatever we can sign for the MLE in 2026 and 2027.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves