People were interested in these podcasts
ImageImageImage

Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning

Moderators: Domejandro, Calinks, Worm Guts

TimberKat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,860
And1: 2,929
Joined: Jul 02, 2022
         

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#541 » by TimberKat » Sun Jun 15, 2025 8:08 pm

younggunsmn wrote:Orlando gave Memphis the Gobert special for Desmond Bane? With that contract?

Do you think GMs call each other now and ask about players and the other guys go, " well he's not on the table, but if you wanted to give me the Rudy Gobert platter I would listen".

Should make Orlando a lot better though. Bane adds shooting and some playmaking and with him and Suggs in the backcourt their defense should be pretty good.

When everyone is special than no one is special anymore. First round pick values are what they are now with one and done, free agency and caps. Late first rounders are worthless. By the time they are ready to contribute, they will be too expensive. 4 first for Bane with salary filler isn't so bad if that is the one piece to put you over the top. However I would had waited until next year to see how the PHX pick pan out.
guest81
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,853
And1: 2,266
Joined: Jun 26, 2014

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#542 » by guest81 » Sun Jun 15, 2025 9:11 pm

If Bane goes for 4 picks would giannis go for 10 or more if it were doable?
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,317
And1: 2,766
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#543 » by Neeva » Sun Jun 15, 2025 9:21 pm

It’s really 5, if you count the swap. Bane isn’t an all star and I can see his play starting to go downhill the closer he gets to 30.
jpatrick
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,662
And1: 1,892
Joined: May 30, 2007
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#544 » by jpatrick » Sun Jun 15, 2025 9:52 pm

People love TSJ. I really like him, but he’s already 25, don’t think his ceiling is that high. Would love to be wrong.

Would we consider sending him home to Chicago? #12/Ball for TSJ/NAW? Not even positive that is legal as NAW S/T would have BYC compensation issues. But with 12/17, we could grab something like Beringer and Coward, which, along with Ball, would really balance out our roster longterm. And as much as Bulls’ fans have love for TSJ from his time at Illinois, not sure they’d love this.
Neeva
Head Coach
Posts: 7,317
And1: 2,766
Joined: Jun 03, 2016

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#545 » by Neeva » Sun Jun 15, 2025 10:39 pm

I think we see a big jump from TJ in his second year. If Finch plays him more of course.
User avatar
Danimals
Junior
Posts: 385
And1: 124
Joined: May 05, 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#546 » by Danimals » Mon Jun 16, 2025 12:43 am

Not considering the cost, who are the point guards that you all would consider the best fit for our roster?
Steph Curry—————Ricky
Michael Jordan———Ant
Lebron James————KG
Kevin Garnett————Love
Nikola Jokic—————KAT
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,206
And1: 776
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#547 » by Norseman79 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 1:56 am

Danimals wrote:Not considering the cost, who are the point guards that you all would consider the best fit for our roster?


Next to Ant? Do you mean realistic or in general?
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,168
And1: 21,811
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#548 » by Klomp » Mon Jun 16, 2025 2:05 am

I called the Memphis shakeup, just didn't expect it to be Bane
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
Danimals
Junior
Posts: 385
And1: 124
Joined: May 05, 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#549 » by Danimals » Mon Jun 16, 2025 2:30 am

Norseman79 wrote:
Danimals wrote:Not considering the cost, who are the point guards that you all would consider the best fit for our roster?


Next to Ant? Do you mean realistic or in general?


Yes, in general.
Steph Curry—————Ricky
Michael Jordan———Ant
Lebron James————KG
Kevin Garnett————Love
Nikola Jokic—————KAT
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,206
And1: 776
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#550 » by Norseman79 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 2:58 am

:nonono:
jpatrick wrote:People love TSJ. I really like him, but he’s already 25, don’t think his ceiling is that high. Would love to be wrong.

Would we consider sending him home to Chicago? #12/Ball for TSJ/NAW? Not even positive that is legal as NAW S/T would have BYC compensation issues. But with 12/17, we could grab something like Beringer and Coward, which, along with Ball, would really balance out our roster longterm. And as much as Bulls’ fans have love for TSJ from his time at Illinois, not sure they’d love this.


If he is a nice bench piece that can score, how much higher does his ceiling need to be?
Note30
Head Coach
Posts: 6,119
And1: 1,872
Joined: Feb 25, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#551 » by Note30 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 3:48 am

TimberKat wrote:
minimus wrote:I guess NAW to ORL doesn't make sense anymore

Gobert to ORL now makes sense but they are out of picks :D


I'd take Franz over Gobert.
FrenchMinnyFan
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,844
And1: 1,050
Joined: Feb 10, 2023
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#552 » by FrenchMinnyFan » Mon Jun 16, 2025 4:13 am

Klomp wrote:I called the Memphis shakeup, just didn't expect it to be Bane


It's a bit strange move on my opinion. Unless the want to rebuild but they have Ja, JJJ and a couple of good players. They are a in-between , quite good but not good enough to be a contender.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,354
And1: 4,885
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#553 » by minimus » Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:40 am

Neeva wrote:
minimus wrote:
Neeva wrote:Who trades that many picks for a non star or guy that doesn’t play that well in play offs and has questionable defense :lol: orlando

Do the magic think Suggs or Bane are a point guard? :o

TOR won championship with FVV/Lowry. The East is wide open after BOS collapse, all ORL need is a healthy season


The fit is like Booker and Beal when Suns first acquired Beal and convinced themselves along with their fans that they would really work :lol: but I doubt Bane will be as big a disaster as Beal has been.

PHO never had defensive identity ORL have
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,354
And1: 4,885
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 1[emoji239[emoji2393]]): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#554 » by minimus » Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:48 am

Neeva wrote:
minimus wrote:It looks like teams will be desperate to acquire more shooting. At this point Id be happy to keep Reid, NAW/DDV and trade Randle and #17 for Cameron Johnson and one of Brokklyn late 2025 FRPs


Why would johnson be worth more than Randle?

He is the best shooter on the market after KD.
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,354
And1: 4,885
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#555 » by minimus » Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:41 am

Howard Cosell wrote:Is Memphis keeping Ja Morant after trading away Bane for all those draft picks?


Read on Twitter
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,354
And1: 4,885
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#556 » by minimus » Mon Jun 16, 2025 8:02 am

Danimals wrote:Not considering the cost, who are the point guards that you all would consider the best fit for our roster?


Darius Garland without his 200/5 contract. In other words fully developed Rob Dillingham but on rookie contract.
Norseman79
Starter
Posts: 2,206
And1: 776
Joined: Jul 26, 2017
     

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#557 » by Norseman79 » Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:46 am

Danimals wrote:
Norseman79 wrote:
Danimals wrote:Not considering the cost, who are the point guards that you all would consider the best fit for our roster?


Next to Ant? Do you mean realistic or in general?


Yes, in general.


Haliburton
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 13,354
And1: 4,885
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#558 » by minimus » Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:47 am

It would be such an irony if after ORL traded for Bane thinking about wiiide open East, KD and Giannis both will land in East as well. Is Giannis to NYK, KD to MIA feasible?
User avatar
ILC
Veteran
Posts: 2,652
And1: 2,236
Joined: Apr 15, 2014
 

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#559 » by ILC » Mon Jun 16, 2025 11:21 am

I don't believe the KD stuff is done at all, but if it is, Tim needs to find a way to get a point guard. I love Mike, I understand the promise Tim made he won't move him, but there has to be a scenario where he can get in another situation for a good team coming off the bench while MIN gets a PG upgrade.

Lonzo would be ok, but I'd try to get in on Fox first maybe if SAS draft Harper and want to pivot again to going younger. Maybe Ivey, Jrue for the right price, White, Ja for the really right price.
LarryBirdsFingr wrote:Redemption. Water into wine....rondo is Jesus
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,156
And1: 19,131
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Trade Talk (Part 17): Early Offseason Planning 

Post#560 » by shrink » Mon Jun 16, 2025 1:02 pm

Danimals wrote:Not considering the cost, who are the point guards that you all would consider the best fit for our roster?

I may be a little different on this one. Right now, Ant could use a PG to help with the playmaking, a guy that could defend well enough to not be targeted, and if he was a scoring threat too, it would help Ant rest more during games and the season. But point guards that do all three of these things are stars, and expensive to acquire and retain.

However, we’re not looking for a PG that would help Ant right now, we are looking for one for next season and beyond. I believe that for Ant to progress, he needs to spend the summer improving his playmaking, particularly learning how to throw the lob to Gobert and activate him as a threat offensively. Many teams today want the ball in the hands of their best player, regardless of whether he is a traditional PG.

If we get THAT Ant, then we could roll with a different, more affordable, back court mate. A cheaper, 3&D perimeter defender would be plenty. I think Connelly believes DiVincenzo could be that guy, but he had a down year after the trade. But any, non-hunted, guard could do this job. I don’t dislike the Ball rumors.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves