ImageImageImage

Just for fun...if the celtics package was like the 76er

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Just for fun...if the celtics package was like the 76er 

Post#1 » by revprodeji » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:51 am

From the celtics we got

1.) Al Jefferson
2.) Ryan Gomes
3.) S. Telfair
4.) G.Green
5.) T.Ratliff
6.) Our pick
7.) Bos pick

Break that down
1.) Young stud Big
2.) young solid rotation player
3.) Young potential player who has yet to put it together
4.) Ditto #4
5.) Large ending contract
6.) Future pick (with all the protections I am considering it late)
7.) Late pick

Now, what did the sixers get for AI?


Andre Miller
Joe Smith
2 first rd picks

For the sake of argument lets say their first rd picks=our first rd picks.

Joe SMith=Theo
Would Wally be Andre Miller?

what is the difference? AI demanded a trade?

Not sure there is much to comment. Just had me thinking a little bit.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: Just for fun...if the celtics package was like the 76er 

Post#2 » by Basti » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:32 am

revprodeji wrote:From the celtics we got

1.) Al Jefferson
2.) Ryan Gomes
3.) S. Telfair
4.) G.Green
5.) T.Ratliff
6.) Our pick
7.) Bos pick

Break that down
1.) Young stud Big
2.) young solid rotation player
3.) Young potential player who has yet to put it together
4.) Ditto #4
5.) Large ending contract
6.) Future pick (with all the protections I am considering it late)
7.) Late pick

Now, what did the sixers get for AI?


Andre Miller
Joe Smith
2 first rd picks

For the sake of argument lets say their first rd picks=our first rd picks.

Joe SMith=Theo
Would Wally be Andre Miller?

what is the difference? AI demanded a trade?

Not sure there is much to comment. Just had me thinking a little bit.


there are any protections on that pick? that would be something new for me...
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

 

Post#3 » by revprodeji » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:37 am

It was our pick coming back to us. But we had so much protection on it that I doubt we ever would give them anything of importance. I considered it a "future late" in order to give it a comparable value.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

 

Post#4 » by Basti » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:50 am

revprodeji wrote:It was our pick coming back to us. But we had so much protection on it that I doubt we ever would give them anything of importance. I considered it a "future late" in order to give it a comparable value.


yeah there were restrictions on that pick when it was traded to the celtics but the way I understood it is that the restrictions got waived after we pushed the trigger on the KG deal
MN Die Hard
Analyst
Posts: 3,396
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#5 » by MN Die Hard » Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:41 pm

I was thinking about this too, and you can throw the Gasol and Kidd trades in there as well. MN did better than all the rest.

Off the top of my head, let's say you can judge a superstar trade by these criteria:

1. Primary young (usually) player in return
2. Additional pieces
3. Picks
4. Expirings
5. Add'l salary dumped with the superstar

All teams got two picks, likely to be late, so let's call that equal and throw out #3. Also, I dont believe any of the teams dumped additional salary with the superstars, so let's throw out #5 as well.

#1 MN got Jefferson, NJ got Harris, Philly got Miller, Memphis got Crittendon.

MN wins by far, with NJ a distant second.

#2 MN wins here as well with Gomes and Telfair. NJ got Diop but more for the expiring. Philly got no additional pieces other than expirings, and memphis got very little.

#4 MN got the biggest expiring, and didnt take back add'l salary. Memphis did all right here as well. NJ got stuck with Hassell, and most of the salary Philly took back was Miller (with Joe Smith the only expiring piece). Another win for MN.

Accross the board, if you agree that these are good criteria to judge a superstar trade, its pretty easy to see that MN came out better than NJ, Memphis, and Philly.
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

 

Post#6 » by funkatron101 » Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:42 pm

To be fair, I think KG has more value than any high profile trade of the last two years. His positive attitude, relatively healthy career, and overall game is hard to beat.

He is being compared to ball hogs, past prime players who are injury prone, and complainers.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves