ImageImageImage

If You Draft Rose, You Must Trade Foye, Play Brewer at 2.

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Steve_Holiday
Pro Prospect
Posts: 798
And1: 51
Joined: Jan 02, 2004
Location: TIB (This Is Bloomtown)

 

Post#21 » by Steve_Holiday » Fri Apr 11, 2008 5:20 am

I don't think it makes sense to unload Foye or McCants with the goal of giving Rose/Mayo/etc and Brewer heavy minutes, especially before next season even starts.

Right now, we know (sort of) what to expect from Foye and McCants. Why trade a known quantity when we have no idea what a new draft pick will bring to the table? And as far as opening up more minutes for Brewer...I don't think he's earned anything more than the 20 a game he's getting now. He definitely hasn't improved during the course of the season (his best month was January).

I'd like to see some positive production from our pick and from brewer before we decide to trade away some of the few talented players on the team.
dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

 

Post#22 » by dunkonu21 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:58 am

I;m sure there are a couple SGs who are taller than 6'6", but I doubt there are very many.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

 

Post#23 » by big3_8_19_21 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:15 am

Foye used to be the biggest guard on a 4 guard starting line-up. He guarded the other teams second biggest guy, aka their PF. I don't think 6'6" is a big problem for him.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
User avatar
PeeDee
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,895
And1: 85
Joined: Dec 30, 2007

 

Post#24 » by PeeDee » Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:22 am

dunkonu21 wrote:I;m sure there are a couple SGs who are taller than 6'6", but I doubt there are very many.


I think the protypical shooting guard starts at 6'6", that's why Foye is considered short for the position.
wolves_fan_82au
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 32
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Contact:

 

Post#25 » by wolves_fan_82au » Fri Apr 11, 2008 1:15 pm

ill chose Mccants hes a year younger and imo will turn out better

the whole foul thing will end up going away eventually we have a lot of time anyway imo we wont be back up there again in the west for 3-4 years
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#26 » by Krapinsky » Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:42 pm

Most of the really good one are 6'6" or close to it-

Kobe (6'6")
Martin (6'7")
Ginobli (6'6")
Roy (6'6")
McGrady (6'8")
Igoudala (6'6'')
Redd (6'6")
Carter (6'6")
Richardson (6'6")
J.Johnson (6'7")
R. Alllen (6'5")
R. Haimlton (6'7")
M.Miller (6'8")
M. Dunleavy (6'9")
J.R. Smith (6'6")
R. Brewer (6'7')

As a matter of fact the only guards less than 6'5" who are in the top 20 PER (according to Hollinger):

Iverson (6'0") very limited defensively
Wade (6'4") somewhat overrated defensively
Ellis (6'3") pretty limited defensively
Gordon (6'3") very limited defensively

^^Notice how only Iverson's team will be in the playoffs, and that's the 8th seed while playing with a pretty stacked team.

I'm convinced that at the starting 2 guard position you need a two way player to be a good team. By all accounts that player is usually 6'6" or taller.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,662
And1: 22,230
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

 

Post#27 » by Klomp » Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:45 pm

Dr.Krapinsky wrote:Most of the really good one are 6'6" or close to it-

Kobe (6'6")
Martin (6'7")
Ginobli (6'6")
Roy (6'6")
McGrady (6'8")
Igoudala
Redd (6'6")
Carter (6'6")
Richardson (6'6")
J.Johnson (6'7")
R. Alllen (6'5")
R. Haimlton (6'7")
M.Miller (6'8")
M. Dunleavy (6'9")
J.R. Smith (6'6")
R. Brewer (6'7')

As a matter of fact the only guards less than 6'5" who are in the top 20 PER (according to Hollinger):

Iverson (6'0") very limited defensively
Wade (6'4") somewhat overrated defensively
Ellis (6'3") pretty limited defensively
Gordon (6'3") very limited defensively

^^Notice how only Iverson's team will be in the playoffs, and that's the 8th seed while playing with a pretty stacked team.

I'm convinced that at the starting 2 guard position you need a two way player to be a good team. By all accounts that player is usually 6'6" or taller.


Umm, aren't they on the same team? How can they have two starting 2-guards?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

 

Post#28 » by deeney0 » Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:59 pm

klomp44 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Umm, aren't they on the same team? How can they have two starting 2-guards?


Wolves get away without having any.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

 

Post#29 » by Krapinsky » Fri Apr 11, 2008 6:59 pm

Always the nitpicker Klomps. Never replying on the merits. Really a constant thorn in my side.

Jk. Obviously I need to be a little more thorough, after all, someday I'll be a realgm and all.

JR Smith is obviously in the 6th man role, as is Ginobli. But their respesctive PERs are so high that they would normally be starters on most teams.

Still, nearly all of the most productive 2 guards in the league are 6'6".
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
mandurugo
Starter
Posts: 2,120
And1: 231
Joined: Aug 14, 2002

 

Post#30 » by mandurugo » Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:01 pm

big3_8_19_21 wrote:Foye used to be the biggest guard on a 4 guard starting line-up. He guarded the other teams second biggest guy, aka their PF. I don't think 6'6" is a big problem for him.


Guarding the average college PF is not the same as guarding an NBA 2-guard. Foye is too small to spend major minutes at the 2 in the NBA.
User avatar
JBoog35
Pro Prospect
Posts: 750
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 25, 2006

 

Post#31 » by JBoog35 » Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:18 am

I am way too tired of hearing about which gaurd we are going to drop. I remind you all of David Ortiz, he had injuries, slumps, etc., and the first full year he has where things click, he turns into a mvp canidate every year... my point. I love, love, love the backcourt of Foye/McCants. Foye has improved already on his outside shot. Let's not forget that both of these 2 gaurds could in 2 years turn into serious offensive options. I don't care much for Rose. Seems like a more athletic Foye, but Foye is a way more clutch. I just hate it when guys start talking about moving 2 players who are gonna torch us in 2 years and become something more for someone else.
"Dude, all I am saying is we already have a starting RB, his name is Chester Taylor. Besides AP isn't that good anyways. I hope we draft McFadden." --Me after he broke the record.
User avatar
Bucky O'Hare
Banned User
Posts: 1,000
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Blazer Fans Love Me!

 

Post#32 » by Bucky O'Hare » Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:25 am

Pacers may be willing to give you their 1st (around #11) and #9 pick in 2005, Ike Diogu, for Foye. It depends on how they value him against the point guards in this years draft.
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

 

Post#33 » by AQuintus » Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:39 am

What would you say to a Foye + Jaric for Marquis Daniels + 11th pick instead?
Image
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

 

Post#34 » by Basti » Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:51 am

no need for daniels IMO
User avatar
Bucky O'Hare
Banned User
Posts: 1,000
And1: 3
Joined: Jan 23, 2008
Location: Blazer Fans Love Me!

 

Post#35 » by Bucky O'Hare » Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:52 am

Daniels is a $7M expiring contract next season, I'm pretty sure that's what he's interested in.

I'd probably do it, but that's easy to say when it's not my millions of dollars being spent.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

 

Post#36 » by Basti » Sat Apr 12, 2008 1:57 am

Bucky O'Hare wrote:Daniels is a $7M expiring contract next season, I'm pretty sure that's what he's interested in.

I'd probably do it, but that's easy to say when it's not my millions of dollars being spent.


well I didn't know he's an expiring. now it makes way more sense
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

 

Post#37 » by revprodeji » Mon Apr 14, 2008 9:54 pm

trading Foye would be wrong at this stage. Same with Shad. Both are young with flashes. Prospects that are growing and need some time because of injuries. Trading them for less value right now is too knee jerk. Even if we do draft Rose. Good teams have good 8 man rotations. If we get Rose then Shad off the bench is almost just as important as having the starting backcourt. We can go big with Brewer at the 2, or even small with Shad at the 3.

The more talent the better. I also think it will fit. We just need a vet 5 to play goalie.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves