ImageImageImage

Our friends at ESPN chime in.

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#21 » by TrentTuckerForever » Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:26 pm

SSUBluesman wrote::lol: This team sucks. Miller and Love do nothing to address the team's defensive woes both on the perimeter and on the inside. Foye missed pretty much all of last season and has established NOTHING. Yea, those deadeye 3 point shooters are going to come in handy with a post player who rarely passes. Brewer? HAHAHAHA. Oh yea, and we have an idiots running the organization and coaching the team.

Yea, things could come together and this team could surprise. But to treat that as (almost) a given while berating those who are skeptical is downright silly, especially when the season hasn't even started. What has this team proven yet? Foye is still not established, and Love is an undersized and unathletic goon until he learns to play otherwise (which is doubtful). Brewer is more energy than skill. Playoffs? **** that we should be the number 1 seed.


Excellent analysis, Bluesman. Compelling, and rich.

No one here is saying that skepticism isn't warranted - they're saying that analysis that makes the Wolves WORSE than last year's team (20 something wins, bottom of the Western conference) doesn't make sense.

By the way, Love measures out athletically almost exactly like Al Horford.
Klomp wrote:Didn't Brad Miller back up Vlade Divac in SAC too?
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,279
And1: 19,284
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#22 » by shrink » Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:51 pm

revprodeji wrote:it is always better to be hated and earn love, then to get undeserved love and bring hate.


I hope McCants doesn't read this, because I don't think he has enough skin left for this much ink.
User avatar
DrSithMirth
Head Coach
Posts: 7,407
And1: 11
Joined: Jun 04, 2005
Location: The Black Lodge. Raise up off me, lest you find yourself with us. Under the sycamore trees..

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#23 » by DrSithMirth » Sun Oct 26, 2008 6:15 pm

I lost respect for ESPN a long time ago. Don't let them have any power.

That said, I do think it'll be a long season, but I'm interested enough to keep watching; I stopped watching early last season. I do not have any faith in management, and my wife keeps wondering why I bother, but I'm still a fan, I guess.
Cheers, Dr. SithMirth
Image
User avatar
SSUBluesman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,252
And1: 1,496
Joined: Nov 02, 2004

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#24 » by SSUBluesman » Sun Oct 26, 2008 8:30 pm

Excellent analysis, Bluesman. Compelling, and rich.

No one here is saying that skepticism isn't warranted - they're saying that analysis that makes the Wolves WORSE than last year's team (20 something wins, bottom of the Western conference) doesn't make sense.

By the way, Love measures out athletically almost exactly like Al Horford.


Actually it does, if people actually stop and think. This team is in the same place it was last year with a bunch of unproven pieces. Al took a step forward (which most thought he would) and Telfair took at least a half step forward (which many didn't think would happen). They added Miller. That's your big improvement from last year. Foye had a lost year. Brewer is still unknown. Love is unknown. They're weaker inside. Their coach is still an idiot. They added nothing that addressed pressing needs (yay an outsider shooter for the post player who doesn't pass). They are just as likely to move backward as they are forward.

That's impressive given I don't ever recall laughing at watching Horford move around the court.
Naz Reid.
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#25 » by casey » Sun Oct 26, 2008 11:57 pm

digitaldropoff wrote:I hate to sound sexist...but I really have a hard time taking a woman's view of an NBA team seriously. She's not a moron by all means....but we wern't even the worst team last year, and I think we've improved greatly from the beginning of last season to now. I don't expect playoffs, but I would be shocked if we ended up with the worst record in the league. I would take her opinions on the WNBA or the fundamentals of a lay up over her write up of any team in the NBA.

Woman doesn't know a thing about basketball.
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#26 » by skorff26 » Mon Oct 27, 2008 1:39 pm

digitaldropoff wrote:I hate to sound sexist...but I really have a hard time taking a woman's view of an NBA team seriously. She's not a moron by all means....but we wern't even the worst team last year, and I think we've improved greatly from the beginning of last season to now. I don't expect playoffs, but I would be shocked if we ended up with the worst record in the league. I would take her opinions on the WNBA or the fundamentals of a lay up over her write up of any team in the NBA.


I wouldn't be making fun of the woman here. She has us at 13 while two of the three guys have us at 15 (the other one has us at 12); I think the woman has a better predicition than the men
User avatar
casey
General Manager
Posts: 7,660
And1: 7
Joined: Jun 18, 2005
Contact:

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#27 » by casey » Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:11 pm

casey wrote:
digitaldropoff wrote:I hate to sound sexist...but I really have a hard time taking a woman's view of an NBA team seriously. She's not a moron by all means....but we wern't even the worst team last year, and I think we've improved greatly from the beginning of last season to now. I don't expect playoffs, but I would be shocked if we ended up with the worst record in the league. I would take her opinions on the WNBA or the fundamentals of a lay up over her write up of any team in the NBA.

Woman doesn't know a thing about basketball.

Hey, who edited me?!
"I'm Ricky Rubio."
--Ricky Rubio
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#28 » by cpfsf » Tue Oct 28, 2008 2:40 pm

SSUBluesman wrote:
Excellent analysis, Bluesman. Compelling, and rich.

No one here is saying that skepticism isn't warranted - they're saying that analysis that makes the Wolves WORSE than last year's team (20 something wins, bottom of the Western conference) doesn't make sense.

By the way, Love measures out athletically almost exactly like Al Horford.


Actually it does, if people actually stop and think. This team is in the same place it was last year with a bunch of unproven pieces. Al took a step forward (which most thought he would) and Telfair took at least a half step forward (which many didn't think would happen). They added Miller. That's your big improvement from last year. Foye had a lost year. Brewer is still unknown. Love is unknown. They're weaker inside. Their coach is still an idiot. They added nothing that addressed pressing needs (yay an outsider shooter for the post player who doesn't pass). They are just as likely to move backward as they are forward.

That's impressive given I don't ever recall laughing at watching Horford move around the court.


"This team is in the same place it was last year with a bunch of unproven pieces...They added Miller. That's your big improvement from last year. Foye had a lost year. Brewer is still unknown. Love is unknown."

OK, Miller is unproven? Al Jefferson is unproven? So we added Miller (who is definitely proven, and so is Jefferson btw), Foye is healthy and averaged 13.1 PPG 4.2 APG and 3.3 RPG last season (he put those stats up after returning from an injury), and we add Carney and Love and you think we suddenly are worse? The team is a year older (which is good for the Wolves and bad for the Spurs as time is not on their side)

"They added nothing that addressed pressing needs (yay an outsider shooter for the post player who doesn't pass"

An outside shooter was one of the teams biggest needs, players were consistently double teaming Al Jefferson. He has more room to operate now as the defense will be more spread apart.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
User avatar
SSUBluesman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,252
And1: 1,496
Joined: Nov 02, 2004

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#29 » by SSUBluesman » Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:31 pm

"This team is in the same place it was last year with a bunch of unproven pieces...They added Miller. That's your big improvement from last year. Foye had a lost year. Brewer is still unknown. Love is unknown."

OK, Miller is unproven? Al Jefferson is unproven? So we added Miller (who is definitely proven, and so is Jefferson btw), Foye is healthy and averaged 13.1 PPG 4.2 APG and 3.3 RPG last season (he put those stats up after returning from an injury), and we add Carney and Love and you think we suddenly are worse? The team is a year older (which is good for the Wolves and bad for the Spurs as time is not on their side)

"They added nothing that addressed pressing needs (yay an outsider shooter for the post player who doesn't pass"

An outside shooter was one of the teams biggest needs, players were consistently double teaming Al Jefferson. He has more room to operate now as the defense will be more spread apart.


"Al took a step forward (which most thought he would) and Telfair took at least a half step forward (which many didn't think would happen). They added Miller. That's your big improvement from last year. Foye had a lost year."

"They added nothing that addressed pressing needs (yay anoutsider shooter for the post player who doesn't pass)"
Naz Reid.
DarkAzcura
General Manager
Posts: 8,870
And1: 7,330
Joined: Apr 21, 2006

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#30 » by DarkAzcura » Tue Oct 28, 2008 6:22 pm

I like the talent on Minny a lot.

ESPN always underrating these kids as normal.

Jefferson, Gomes, Love, Miller, Foye, Telfair, McCants, Smith..how could people think this team is terrible? Probably no playoffs, but I still think they'll be decent. I don't know much about the coaching situation in Minny, though, so maybe your players are running around like there is no defense or offense in place haha. I don't think that's the case, though.
User avatar
Basti
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,610
And1: 3,845
Joined: Sep 07, 2005
Location: Æ ha en ståkukk!
   

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#31 » by Basti » Tue Oct 28, 2008 9:17 pm

DarkAzcura wrote:I like the talent on Minny a lot.

ESPN always underrating these kids as normal.

Jefferson, Gomes, Love, Miller, Foye, Telfair, McCants, Smith..how could people think this team is terrible? Probably no playoffs, but I still think they'll be decent. I don't know much about the coaching situation in Minny, though, so maybe your players are running around like there is no defense or offense in place haha. I don't think that's the case, though.


hey our coach received a vote for COY 2008/09 by an ESPN so called expert
User avatar
andyhop
Analyst
Posts: 3,627
And1: 1,318
Joined: May 08, 2007
   

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#32 » by andyhop » Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:53 am

This 82games article using the preseason records of teams to predict regular season records gives a much more positive prediction for the Wolves.
http://www.82games.com/preseason0809.htm

To put it in perspective, the rare poor prior year team that strings together some wins in the preseason has seen an average gain of 17 wins in the next year!


That would be us

One last oddity to wrap it up: teams that have improved their preseason win% over last year by .400 or more gain an average of 17 wins...


That would be us too!!!!!!!

Combining both stats we can clearly see that the Wolves are on course to go 56-26 this season and be a top 3 or 4 seed in the playoffs because stats don't lie.
"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
User avatar
hijacktheparade
Starter
Posts: 2,439
And1: 4
Joined: Jul 02, 2008

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#33 » by hijacktheparade » Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:00 am

klomp44 wrote:Anyone watching LA halftime? They dissed our court.


"Where we at, Boise State? Look at that floor!"


I was coming to post the same thing. ****ing ESPN.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,685
And1: 22,249
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#34 » by Klomp » Thu Oct 30, 2008 4:01 am

Anyone watching LA halftime? They dissed our court.


"Where we at, Boise State? Look at that floor!"
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,826
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#35 » by C.lupus » Thu Oct 30, 2008 1:09 pm

ESPN is about one notch above Bleacher Report.
User avatar
TMo519
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,274
And1: 25
Joined: Jun 10, 2008
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#36 » by TMo519 » Thu Oct 30, 2008 2:33 pm

Haters....the floor is tight lol
User avatar
4ho5ive
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,034
And1: 3
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Location: Minnesota-Where underwhelming happens
Contact:

Re: Our friends at ESPN chime in. 

Post#37 » by 4ho5ive » Thu Oct 30, 2008 6:44 pm

I think in the 2nd quarter of the Suns-Spurs game, Jeff Van Gundy and Marc Jackson gave their surprise NBA teams for this season. Surprisingly, JVG mentioned us as one of his two surprise teams, i dont think they were talking playoffs, but its still encouraging. Thanks Milhouse's dad!

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves