ImageImageImage

Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

ritt0093
Sophomore
Posts: 156
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2007

Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#1 » by ritt0093 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 1:48 pm

Ok According to Hoopshype the NOH current salary is 73.806 Million. According to ESPN the luxury threshold is 71.15 Million. Lastly, according to shrink :D if a team waives Atkins they save 2.72 Million. Therefore if use Atkins we can get NOH under the lux tax.

This trade couln't happen until Sept 24th, according to the trade checker, but it works then.

MIN OUT/NOH IN:
Darius Songalia (4.526, 4.818)
Chucky Atkins (3.48)

MIN IN/ NOH OUT:
Antonio Daniels (6.60)
Julian Wright (2.00, 2.85 (team opt), 3.95 (QO))
2nd Round Pick

NOH would save .6 M from the trade straight up, and then an additonal 2.7 Million if they waived Atkins. This would get them under the Luxury threshold for a total savings of:

.6 (reduced real salaries in Trade)
2.72 (releasing Atkins)
2.7 luxury tax Penalties
3 luxury tax share

9 Milion this season.
TDWOLVESFAN
Sophomore
Posts: 180
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 08, 2008

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#2 » by TDWOLVESFAN » Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:57 pm

I like this trade. Julian Wright is an interesting prospect with his length and athletism. He is supposed to be able to play both SF and PF. We don't give up that much in Songalia except he can play some center.......If Al is truly coming back at the beginning of the season this would work well. If he isn't ready at the beginning of the season we are very thin at center.

Antonio would be a solid mentor for Jonny Flynn and his contract can be used for trading in February if needed or if Rubio would come over.
I've been a fan since the beginning and I will be until my end.
User avatar
tvwolves7
Junior
Posts: 397
And1: 1
Joined: Jul 10, 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#3 » by tvwolves7 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 3:59 pm

I think the 2nd round pick might be too much.

Also from what I know about Wright's game, he and Okafor compliment each other well compared to Wright and Chandler. So who knows if it would take more then financial flexibility to make it happen.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#4 » by john2jer » Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:05 pm

I'd do this trade in a heartbeat, even without the 2nd round pick.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#5 » by skorff26 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 7:47 pm

definitely sign me up for this one, and I think there is a good chance that New Orleans does it as well.
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#6 » by big3_8_19_21 » Thu Aug 13, 2009 10:39 pm

I'd switch the second round pick, maybe one going to them instead of coming to us, but it's a very nice base for a trade.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#7 » by GopherIt! » Thu Aug 13, 2009 11:57 pm

Lux is 69.9M if I am not mistaken. That makes them just under 3.7M away from the lux line.

Helping New Orleans is going to be more difficult than I first realized. The Hornets also currently have 12 players and after this trade (and buying out Atkins) they would need to still sign 2 players to get to the league minimum of 13. What this means for us is that they would probably have to take on a contract smaller than Songalia's (perhaps Wilkins) and this still might not be enough without some other maneuvering. Looking at the Hornets finances here's the number's I have.

NO out/MN in:
Daniels $6,600,000
Wright $2,000,040
total $8,600,040

MN out/NO in:
Atkins $3,480,000 (760K guaranteed)
Wilkins $3,630,000
total $7,110,000 ($4,390,000)

New Orleans 2009-10 salaries:
$73,581,295
-$1,490,040 (savings in trade)
-$2,720,000 (Atkins buyout savings)
$69,371,040

That gets NO about 4.2M in cap savings bringing them around 500K below the
lux but still not enough savings if they have to bring in two more players for the
league minimum. I guess they could then try to trade Devin Brown's 1.1M salary
for a TPE and sign someone else to the league minimum and make it work that way.
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 50,235
And1: 17,158
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#8 » by Calinks » Fri Aug 14, 2009 12:44 am

Oh, numbers... how I hate them!
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
NewWolvesOrder
Head Coach
Posts: 6,943
And1: 1,262
Joined: Dec 20, 2008

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#9 » by NewWolvesOrder » Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:25 am

Songaila, Atkins(waived) for Daniels, D.Brown

this move saves hornets 5 mill and gives them some frontcourt depth, I don't think they give up wright for songaila.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#10 » by GopherIt! » Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:22 am

Calinks sayeth:
Oh, numbers... how I hate them!


chicks dig the long division
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,727
And1: 22,293
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#11 » by Klomp » Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:23 am

GopherIt! wrote:Calinks sayeth:
Oh, numbers... how I hate them!


chicks dig the long division


DIVIDE AND CONQUER!!!!!!
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#12 » by revprodeji » Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:35 am

Screw Wright.

Song+Atkins for Daniels works. Do that, we get out of Song's contract. That is the most important thing. Wright is not worth it.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#13 » by skorff26 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:50 am

Getting NOH below the luxury tax line

Songalia 4,526,000 + Atkins (bought out) 760,000 + Pecherov 1,547,640 + Brown 736,420 = 7,570,060
for
Daniels 6,600,000 + Wright 2,000,040 + D. Brown 1,107,572 + Armstrong 2,801,198 = 12,508,810

Saves New Orleans 4,938,750 in cap space (73,717,055 from shamsports.com - 4,938,750 = 68,778,305 salary); the luxury tax is 69.9 million, so this gives them room to sign a minimum salary player ("a waived Blount?" or some other big)

Why Minnesota? We get to see if Wright or Armstrong are any good.
Jefferson/Armstron
Love/Wright/Cardinal
Gomes/Brewer
Brewer/Wilkins/Ellington
Flynn/Daniels

Why New Orleans? They save 4,938,750 in salary x 2 (luxury tax) = 9,877,500 + 3,000,000 est. luxury tax share = 12,877,500 in savings. Over 10 million in savings for a team like NOH is huge, plus the 4 players they give up all were backups (Armstrong played the most with 15.6 mpg)
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#14 » by skorff26 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 4:53 am

revprodeji wrote:Screw Wright.

Song+Atkins for Daniels works. Do that, we get out of Song's contract. That is the most important thing. Wright is not worth it.

Not enough incentive for New Orleans to do it.

They save 4,526,000 + 760,000 = 5,286,000;
6,600,000 - 5,286,000 = 1,314,000 x 2 = 2,628,000 in savings this year

But they add Songalia next year for 4,818,000; so in the long run they would pay more (also this is very likely to be doubled because of the luxury tax as well). So they may end up losing 7 million in the trade.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#15 » by revprodeji » Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:06 am

Why would NO do the OP and not my deal? Add another crap exp if we need to.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
User avatar
big3_8_19_21
RealGM
Posts: 12,113
And1: 421
Joined: Jan 17, 2005

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#16 » by big3_8_19_21 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:11 am

without Wright involved, I don't think NOH gets under the lux.

I like Songaila+Atkins for Wright+Daniels
plus a parallel deal:
Devin Brown for TPE created in Richardson/Blount trade

that should be enough savings...maybe toss them a wad of cash? I guess that's Glen Taylor's call.
Thriving on mediocrity since '89.
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#17 » by skorff26 » Fri Aug 14, 2009 11:32 am

revprodeji wrote:Why would NO do the OP and not my deal? Add another crap exp if we need to.

because it doesn't save them money in the long run, they save 2.5 million or so this year and are still in the luxury tax; but next year they would have to pay songalia close to 5 million and it would likely be doubled because of the luxury tax.

New Orleans does the deal only to save money, and in the long run they lose a lot of money in your scenario, with very little savings for them this year.
Marc
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,267
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 26, 2009

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#18 » by Marc » Fri Aug 14, 2009 5:53 pm

Songalia + Atkins for Daniels + Armstrong

Great deal for both teams! Wolves get rid of Songalia. Hornets save around $8M this season.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,286
And1: 19,298
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: Putting NOH under the tax, and getting a perk 

Post#19 » by shrink » Mon Aug 17, 2009 6:20 am

Keep in mind that even if we get NOH under the lux this year, they still have to worry about next season. Right now they have nearly $62 mil in guaranteed salary in six contracts, and its possible that hoping to get rid of Songalia's 2-year deal just won't work for the Hornets. Now they may, to get free this year and worry about next year when it comes. However, I would think that the Hornets are more likely to accept a deal where they pay for Atkins in current value (pick, prospects), and don't add 2010 salary, or perhaps work out a three team deal where they move Songalia to a better team.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves