ImageImageImage

The Triangle

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
invno1
Starter
Posts: 2,447
And1: 9
Joined: Jun 17, 2003
Location: Islamorada, FL

The Triangle 

Post#1 » by invno1 » Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:30 pm

It's really going to be interesting to see how long Rambis can develop this crew into the the triangle, they really struggled with it with the Bulls. When Rambis just let them go, the game was more entertaining. It is really difficult to grasp and develop the spacing and movement. Crazy ting is it almost seems to go against the strengths of Timberwolves studs. Flynn wants to run and the triangle asks him to be a shooter. Stacy King the Bulls announcer was really breaking it down last night, he did a great job of of trying to teach how it works, Timberwolves are a running crew, triangle seems to be more of a 1/2 court game. More will be revealed.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: The Triangle 

Post#2 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:54 pm

we need to do both; as far as some half court sets, it's hard to argue against the success the triangle has seen.
Image
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: The Triangle 

Post#3 » by funkatron101 » Thu Oct 15, 2009 3:17 pm

Well, even the Lakers don't use the triangle offense exclusively. So, there will definitely be situations that call for both.

Here is one example that I think the Wolves can effectively do. Now I pictured Sessions taking Fisher's role and Flynn taking Kobe's role in this scenario. Flynn may not yet gain enough respect to draw the double team, but if he continues to show that he can drive to the basket, I can certainly see Al or Love being completely open to finish.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7muOtu2N9Og
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Winter Wonder
Rookie
Posts: 1,198
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
       

Re: The Triangle 

Post#4 » by Winter Wonder » Thu Oct 15, 2009 4:53 pm

There were a couple of offensive series where the Wolves spread out the floor and ran a high screen and flare with Cardinal and Sessions, both base line 3 point spots filled and on wing, and the spacing and, well it looked quite nice and really gave Ramon room to work. He ended up drawing a foul going to the basket, but both the flare and ball side corner were open as well. With the speed and strength of our PG's and shooting of our PF's, we should run more pick and pop or pick and roll basketball... I saw some, I hope to see much more.
IcemanMN
Sophomore
Posts: 125
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 15, 2007

Re: The Triangle 

Post#5 » by IcemanMN » Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:39 pm

Exactly. That was the part of last night's game that really puzzled me. Put the pick and roll back into the dang offense.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: The Triangle 

Post#6 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:42 pm

IcemanMN wrote:Exactly. That was the part of last night's game that really puzzled me. Put the pick and roll back into the dang offense.


they will once the game matters, but that stuff is so automatic I don't think the feel the need to practice it; they want to get some basic sets in. Probably anyways, that'd be my theory.
Image
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,333
And1: 12,193
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: The Triangle 

Post#7 » by Worm Guts » Thu Oct 15, 2009 5:43 pm

If you're going to work through the kinks of installing a new offense, the preseason is the time. They had an article in the Trib yesterday about how Rambis is trying to force Flynn to work on other things. He's a good pick and roll player but he needs to get better at running the offense.
User avatar
Tekkenlaw
Starter
Posts: 2,078
And1: 39
Joined: Apr 16, 2008

Re: The Triangle 

Post#8 » by Tekkenlaw » Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:33 pm

I didn't know the Wolves were actually going to run the triangle, they don't really have the personnel for it outside of Love who is perfect.
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: The Triangle 

Post#9 » by revprodeji » Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:08 pm

I cannot site this, but they are not allowed to run P/R-P/P in the games. They are working on other plays that they are struggling with. We know Flynn/Love can run the P/R-P/P and we know Flynn can slash. So why waste precious practice time doing those things? Work on what needs working on. It is the bloody pre-season.

Triangle does not need certain personal. Jackson's version of the triangle needs certain people. Tex Winter's triple post is different. jackson modified it. Just as Rambis will also.

Running the triangle does not mean you run it everytime. I coach and I have a 4-out 1 in swing as our basic play, but we also use the Hawk P/r, hawk 2p/r, Hawk post and a spider.

Give them time.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,002
And1: 6,019
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: The Triangle 

Post#10 » by Devilzsidewalk » Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:25 pm

If you don't cite your sources, then how are we supposed to add it to Wikipedia?
Image
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: The Triangle 

Post#11 » by revprodeji » Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:24 pm

It was not a **source** it was something I read. I just cannot remember where.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: The Triangle 

Post#12 » by GopherIt! » Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:11 am

if it's not on Wikipedia I won't believe it.
User avatar
jade_hippo
Starter
Posts: 2,383
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!
 

Re: The Triangle 

Post#13 » by jade_hippo » Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:40 am

i agree with rev, we aren't running anything we plan on featuring on a nightly basis. this is the time to work on just being on the court together and working kinks out of things for the season.

also the only way i see a triangle type offense being implimented full time is if Jefferson goes down again or relapses and Flynn is a complete bust. a triangle featuring Sessions, Gomes, Love supported with Cardinal, Ellington, and Hollins actually would have me salavating. could hide a lot of their deficiencies in that and make up for a real lack of talent in general with some well run sets.
User avatar
TDot_nomad
Ballboy
Posts: 44
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 25, 2009
Location: Bay Area

Re: The Triangle 

Post#14 » by TDot_nomad » Fri Oct 16, 2009 5:31 am

I'm intrigued to find out if the TWolves have the personnel to successfully run Rambis' version of the Triangle. I just don't see Flynn and Sessions as consistent enough outside shooters yet; Flynn I think will eventually get there. I think Rambis has a good approach and hopefully a lot of kinks will get worked out in pre-season.

On a different note:
From the quotes I've read, it seems that Rambis is willing to give up on the "two point guard lineup". I find this extremely amusing. From an outside perspective I am not a fan of Kahn; and although I'm a huge Jonny Flynn fan I would have fun watching the "two point guard" idea fail in Minnesota - does Kahn really believe that two guys 6'2" and shorter can successfully guard nba backcourts? Does Kahn realize that defense wins championships?
Respect the ball. Learn the ball. Cherish the ball. Share your love with others
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,333
And1: 12,193
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: The Triangle 

Post#15 » by Worm Guts » Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:52 am

TDot_nomad wrote:
On a different note:
From the quotes I've read, it seems that Rambis is willing to give up on the "two point guard lineup". I find this extremely amusing. From an outside perspective I am not a fan of Kahn; and although I'm a huge Jonny Flynn fan I would have fun watching the "two point guard" idea fail in Minnesota - does Kahn really believe that two guys 6'2" and shorter can successfully guard nba backcourts? Does Kahn realize that defense wins championships?


Come on, Kahn's goal is obviously talent accumulation at this point.
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: The Triangle 

Post#16 » by john2jer » Fri Oct 16, 2009 4:18 pm

Sessions is 6'3" and the hate that Kahn draws for absolutely no reason is hilarious. Why is TDot so butt hurt?
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
revprodeji
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 22,388
And1: 8
Joined: Dec 25, 2002
Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
Contact:

Re: The Triangle 

Post#17 » by revprodeji » Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:40 pm

Many teams go "small" for 10-15 min a game with 1 mobile post, 1 SF, 1 SG and 1 pg. Go uptempo for a little while. This is not a revolutionary idea.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Winter Wonder
Rookie
Posts: 1,198
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 02, 2008
       

Re: The Triangle 

Post#18 » by Winter Wonder » Fri Oct 16, 2009 6:42 pm

First, whole-heartedly believe in and agree with working on things that need work on in pre-season practices/scrimmages/games or whatever you want to call them. They assuredly need the work and they are going to need a number of different offensive sets in order to best utilize their talent and to attack favorable match-ups or different defensive schemes. So, again, no problem with them working the traingle and whatever else they are going to, I just liked what I saw with the PnR and PnP.

As for the big deal everyone is making about the two PG thing, people are aware we are talking about different players I hope. If I am not mistaken, Rubio does have a few inches on the other PG's and would create a little bit of a different dynamic on the floor both offensively and defensively, right? I don't see Flynn and Sessions having the potential that Flynn or Sessions would have with Rubio. Granted, I am not sold on that either, but this is not the same scenario as presented on draft night and shouldn't be taken as such blasphemy or whatever from what Kahn may have originally invisioned. It seems to me, both Flynn and Sessions have more similar game styles and that could be why it wouldn't work as well as it would if one of them brought something different to the floor. Either way, I don't think this is a tragedy or major deal as the media or other teams' fans seem to think it may be.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves