ImageImageImage

Minnesota/Sacramento

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Grade the trade

Both teams accept
2
13%
Minnesota accepts Sacramento rejects
0
No votes
Minnesota rejects Sacramento accepts
5
33%
Both teams reject
8
53%
Not sure
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 15

cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#1 » by cpfsf » Thu Jan 7, 2010 4:08 am

With my +26 score in +/-, I'm sure you agree that I'm more than qualified making trade proposals :D

With that said, how about Flynn for Casspi?

Minnesota improves its shooting
Minnesota saves money for 2011

Sacramento balances its roster (Nocioni, Casspi, Udoka, and Greene all play SF)
They don't have a lot of depth at PG (Udrih and Rodriguez)
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#2 » by john2jer » Thu Jan 7, 2010 4:11 am

Funny enough, I don't know if Sacremento does that, and Minnesota could never justify it.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#3 » by AQuintus » Thu Jan 7, 2010 4:20 am

Personally, I'd rather try to do the whole Flynn for Fernandez trade. It accomplishes the same goals, but it has the added benefit of bringing in Ricky Rubio's BFF.
Image
Narf
Head Coach
Posts: 6,550
And1: 882
Joined: Sep 05, 2009

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#4 » by Narf » Thu Jan 7, 2010 4:30 am

That's a fantastic idea cpfsf. Unfortunately I voted both teams reject it. Oh well.
User avatar
jade_hippo
Starter
Posts: 2,383
And1: 135
Joined: Jan 05, 2009
Location: Take off... eh!
 

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#5 » by jade_hippo » Thu Jan 7, 2010 4:46 am

i also said both decline. this is not the kind of deal you make half way through their first seasons. I think its in both teams best interests to give them some more time to get settled. Only way I include either of them in a deal is if its part of something larget to net a big name, not a straight up trade in hopes its convenient for both teams.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#6 » by GopherIt! » Thu Jan 7, 2010 4:51 am

As GopherIt! & Jazzh8ter4life I decline.
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#7 » by cpfsf » Thu Jan 7, 2010 4:57 am

cpfsf is a sad panda, this is one trade I would have done (often times I wouldn't even pull the trigger on trades I propose).

I was really high on Casspi before the draft (still am). Really I just want this trade because it allows Rubio to be the full time point guard while bringing in a talent roughly equal to Flynn.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Ojmayo
Banned User
Posts: 1,263
And1: 30
Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Location: Austin, TX

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#8 » by Ojmayo » Thu Jan 7, 2010 5:00 am

Hell no.

Casspi is overrated.
cpfsf
General Manager
Posts: 8,834
And1: 1,126
Joined: Apr 10, 2008
Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
 

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#9 » by cpfsf » Thu Jan 7, 2010 5:11 am

I was about to post this on the Sacramento board, but they have a thread that Casspi is number one on ESPN's Insider, so I'm going to hold off on that.
Image

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
User avatar
Slum_Dillinger
Junior
Posts: 483
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 12, 2009

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#10 » by Slum_Dillinger » Thu Jan 7, 2010 5:42 am

GopherIt! wrote:As GopherIt! & Jazzh8ter4life I decline.


:lol: :lol:

My first sig!
RE: Trading for Beasley
PeeDee wrote:Don't want him.

Strike one: Supercoolbeas
Strike two: He was supercoolrelieved when MN didn't get a top-2 pick.
Strike three: Been in supercoolrehab already.
User avatar
John Doe [MIN]
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,281
And1: 9
Joined: Jul 15, 2009

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#11 » by John Doe [MIN] » Thu Jan 7, 2010 10:01 am

There's a difference between 'wouldn't happen' and 'shouldn't happen.' Obviously it wouldn't happen. But it makes sense to me, so it should.

Flynn is the more prominent rookie, but Casspi has been a better player. It's a better fit for both teams. Sacramento sells its fans on upgrading from a 23rd pick to a 6th pick who's been getting starter's minutes for his team. Minnesota sells its fans on fixing its mistake and getting the better player. Both teams accept.
the_bruce
Analyst
Posts: 3,536
And1: 57
Joined: Jun 01, 2007

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#12 » by the_bruce » Thu Jan 7, 2010 1:28 pm

meh
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 27,343
And1: 12,201
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#13 » by Worm Guts » Thu Jan 7, 2010 1:30 pm

John Doe [MN] wrote:There's a difference between 'wouldn't happen' and 'shouldn't happen.' Obviously it wouldn't happen. But it makes sense to me, so it should.

Flynn is the more prominent rookie, but Casspi has been a better player. It's a better fit for both teams. Sacramento sells its fans on upgrading from a 23rd pick to a 6th pick who's been getting starter's minutes for his team. Minnesota sells its fans on fixing its mistake and getting the better player. Both teams accept.


I don't think Minnesota fans think we made a mistake. I think the trade would bring bad juju.
Tirion
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,752
And1: 290
Joined: Oct 27, 2005

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#14 » by Tirion » Thu Jan 7, 2010 1:49 pm

Ojmayo wrote:Hell no.

Casspi is overrated.


actually he's not. and yes, he's been a better player than Flynn.

there is no way Sacto will give him up for Flynn though.
slinky
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,332
And1: 76
Joined: Dec 13, 2006

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#15 » by slinky » Thu Jan 7, 2010 2:55 pm

Tirion wrote:
Ojmayo wrote:Hell no.

Casspi is overrated.


actually he's not. and yes, he's been a better player than Flynn.

there is no way Sacto will give him up for Flynn though.


And there is no way MIN gives up Flynn for Casspi either. Casspi is playing better than Flynn but Flynn is also being forced to play a role he has never played before. And its entirely possible that he will never grow into this role as a passing PG. But I think we need to give a rookie PG learning a difficult offense, a little more time than just 1/2 a season.
GopherIt!
RealGM
Posts: 10,599
And1: 24,742
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Location: bird watching
Contact:

Re: Minnesota/Sacramento 

Post#16 » by GopherIt! » Fri Jan 8, 2010 12:04 am

Slum_Dillinger wrote:
GopherIt! wrote:As GopherIt! & Jazzh8ter4life I decline.


:lol: :lol:

My first sig!


Sweet! I think that's the first time I've been sig'ed. I feel like I've arrived. When do the royalty checks start coming in?

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves