which timberwolve is overpaid (by postive stats)

thecouch · Post #1 » by **thecouch** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:18 am

2010 salary divide by (points+rebounds+steals+assists+blocks)
nathan jawai $98715
wayne ellington $104646
kevin love $110963
jonny flynn $135336
corey brewer $136778
oleksiy pecherov $170821
sasha pavlovic $207182
ryan hollins $211768
ryan gomes $220913
alando tucker $223275
ramon sessions $260146
damien wilkins $287866
al jefferson $381800
mark blount $1189160
brian cardinal $1824324
this does not take in how many games or minutes they have played .just there stats when they are on the court

Krapinsky · Post #2 » by **Krapinsky** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:23 am

I hope you didn't wast too much time with that

Diggler · Post #3 » by **Diggler** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 1:10 am

I think you're kind of oversimplifying a bit. For example, you can't count 1 block as equal to 1 point. If it was as easy to get a block as it was to score a point, you'd be seeing people with 30 blocks per game. Interesting idea though.

Breakdown777 · Post #4 » by **Breakdown777** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:11 am

I'm not sure which WOLVE I think is overpaid. Maybe I'll go ask my WIVE while she is chopping carrots with a KNIVE.

shangrila · Post #5 » by **shangrila** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:54 am

If your formula doesn't say Sasha Pavlovic, your formula is wrong.

Foye · Post #6 » by **Foye** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 12:02 pm

shangrila wrote:If your formula doesn't say Sasha Pavlovic, your formula is wrong.

Post #7 » by **C.lupus** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:11 pm

Shouldn't Blount's number be $7,967,375?

Foye · Post #8 » by **Foye** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:35 pm

C.lupus wrote:Shouldn't Blount's number be $7,967,375?

Shouldn't it be infinite? Because he hasn't had a positive stat this season yet :lol:

Post #9 » by **Calinks** » Sun Jan 31, 2010 8:20 pm

Foye wrote:
C.lupus wrote:Shouldn't Blount's number be $7,967,375?

Shouldn't it be infinite? Because he hasn't had a positive stat this season yet

Yet he still has done more good for this team on the court than Sasha Pavlovic.

Devilzsidewalk · Post #10 » by **Devilzsidewalk** » Wed Feb 3, 2010 5:27 pm

looks about right to me

Foye · Post #11 » by **Foye** » Wed Feb 3, 2010 5:29 pm

Calinks wrote:
Foye wrote:
C.lupus wrote:Shouldn't Blount's number be $7,967,375?

Shouldn't it be infinite? Because he hasn't had a positive stat this season yet

Yet he still has done more good for this team on the court than Sasha Pavlovic.

I agree with you.