So... would you scrap the triangle?
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
So... would you scrap the triangle?
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 50,235
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
So... would you scrap the triangle?
If you could determine how the wolves play would you scrap the triangle or stick with it? If you would make any changes what would they be? Limited triangle? More pick and roll? Half court? What would be your style of play?
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Calinks wrote:If you could determine how the wolves play would you scrap the triangle or stick with it? If you would make any changes what would they be? Limited triangle? More pick and roll? Half court? What would be your style of play?
Shaq played and excelled in the triangle. I see no reason to think Cousins or Jefferson cannot. No reason to scrap it.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,756
- And1: 22,334
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Krapinsky wrote:Shaq played and excelled in the triangle. I see no reason to think Cousins or Jefferson cannot. No reason to scrap it.
Yeah, because theres no difference between a top 5 center of all time and freakin' Al Jefferson or Demarcus Cousins....
Having said that, keep the triangle, don't blame it.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- revprodeji
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 22,388
- And1: 8
- Joined: Dec 25, 2002
- Location: Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought
- Contact:
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
wow, Klomp what a prick response.
http://www.timetoshop.org
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Weight management, Sports nutrition and more...
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
You mean stop using it 20% of the time?
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,756
- And1: 22,334
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
revprodeji wrote:wow, Klomp what a prick response.
Sorry. You get those from me every once in a while.....along with some horrendous trade offers.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 787
- And1: 17
- Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Shaq was a very good passer averaging 2.6 assist per game for his career and between 3 and 4 per game in his prime with the Lakers. I don't see Jefferson or Cousins with that kind of passing ability.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- AQuintus
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,425
- And1: 2,458
- Joined: Jan 10, 2008
- Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
-
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Dan's with the Wolves wrote:Shaq was a very good passer averaging 2.6 assist per game for his career and between 3 and 4 per game in his prime with the Lakers. I don't see Jefferson or Cousins with that kind of passing ability.
I don't know. From what I've read, Cousins was apparently a great passer in HS, and he showed flashes of that passing ability at Kentucky. On top of that, Bynum is currently the starting C on a championship level Triangle team, and he's not much of a passer.

Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,756
- And1: 22,334
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
AQuintus wrote:On top of that, Bynum is currently the starting C on a championship level Triangle team, and he's not much of a passer.
See Gasol, Pau.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- AQuintus
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,425
- And1: 2,458
- Joined: Jan 10, 2008
- Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
-
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Klomp wrote:
See Gasol, Pau.
I looked up Gasol,Pau in the dictionary and I found "The guy who is currently the starting POWER FORWARD for the defending championship LA Lakers."

Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,834
- And1: 1,126
- Joined: Apr 10, 2008
- Location: sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
-
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
I still don't think the triangle was the best offense for this team last season. It's hard to tell what our roster will be in a month or two, but I only hope that Rambis is flexible. If something doesn't work, than I hope he tries something else.

sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell sam mitchell
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
revprodeji wrote:wow, Klomp what a prick response.
He's just mad about me upsetting his Aminu tweener status denial
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Klomp wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Shaq played and excelled in the triangle. I see no reason to think Cousins or Jefferson cannot. No reason to scrap it.
Yeah, because theres no difference between a top 5 center of all time and freakin' Al Jefferson or Demarcus Cousins....
Having said that, keep the triangle, don't blame it.
I'm not sure where I implied either player was the next Shaq. My point is that you can run the triangle around a #1 half court dominant post option effectively. The triangle did not hold Shaq back. If anything it made him more effective. The key to the triangle is taking advantage of double teams, making quick passes, and finding the open man, or best one on one matchup.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
-
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 787
- And1: 17
- Joined: Nov 06, 2004
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Krapinsky wrote:[
I'm not sure where I implied either player was the next Shaq. My point is that you can run the triangle around a #1 half court dominant post option effectively. The triangle did not hold Shaq back. If anything it made him more effective. The key to the triangle is taking advantage of double teams, making quick passes, and finding the open man, or best one on one matchup.
Which neither Cousins or Jefferson does very well.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Dan's with the Wolves wrote:Krapinsky wrote:[
I'm not sure where I implied either player was the next Shaq. My point is that you can run the triangle around a #1 half court dominant post option effectively. The triangle did not hold Shaq back. If anything it made him more effective. The key to the triangle is taking advantage of double teams, making quick passes, and finding the open man, or best one on one matchup.
Which neither Cousins or Jefferson does very well.
Very true w/ Jefferson. This is something Rambis has him working on. Regardless, it's clear we're not scrapping the triangle for Jefferson. Re Cousins, I don't think that's the case. At Kentucky, his lack of passing was likely be design. He had no reason to pass. If he got the ball near the basket it was in his team's best interest for him to go hard to the basket. If he didn't score, chances were he was going to get to the line.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 50,235
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Well if you watch the Lakers of today they use the post alot. Not just with bigs either, the post seems to be an integral part of the triangle. Maybe because it allows players to see the other offensive players moving in the triangle for pass outs. Also I don't think its impossible to teach anyone how to pass out of the post. They may not be as crafty at it as others but they can learn to see the obvious plays. Also, when you got Darko out there you got a "point guard in the paint" as Al Jefferson puts it.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
Dan's with the Wolves wrote:Krapinsky wrote:[
I'm not sure where I implied either player was the next Shaq. My point is that you can run the triangle around a #1 half court dominant post option effectively. The triangle did not hold Shaq back. If anything it made him more effective. The key to the triangle is taking advantage of double teams, making quick passes, and finding the open man, or best one on one matchup.
Which neither Cousins or Jefferson does very well.
From DX 2009 write up ---
"Even more impressive though was Cousins’ ability to pass the ball. Constantly keeping his head up, he was able to find the open man on a regular basis when faced with a double team. The stat sheet reflected this based on his 5 assists with one lone turnover, and the senior could have had a handful more assists had his teammates done a better job of finishing. This ability is going to translate immediately at the collegiate level due to the fact that at all of the programs recruiting him (with the exception of Wake Forest and Louisville), he will likely be the focal point of the post offense and will certainly be faced with multiple defenders consistently."
From 2007 write up --
"Cousins showed off the game of the skilled power forward that he is finally at the LeBron camp, seeming to finally get it through his head that he is much better suited on the blocks then he his hanging around the perimeter all day. The passing and ball handling skills that he showed off were unbelievable for a player standing 6’9 and nearly 250 lbs. He is a nightmare to guard on the offensive end, able to take slower defenders off of the dribble from the wing, but also able to kill you in post with his remarkably soft touch."
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
- Breakdown777
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,759
- And1: 47
- Joined: Sep 17, 2009
- Location: MN
Re: So... would you scrap the triangle?
I'm hopping on the Cousins bandwagon. Get the big lug over here, and trade one of the similar pieces for some picks/wing help.
And YES, scrap the triangle. Either that or completely overhaul the roster AGAIN.
And YES, scrap the triangle. Either that or completely overhaul the roster AGAIN.
"Llevaré mi talento a Minnesota".
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves