ImageImageImage

FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

dunkonu21
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,299
And1: 40
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Location: An Igloo
   

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#41 » by dunkonu21 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:01 am

I'm starting to like Chad Ford a little more.
User avatar
BrooklynBulls
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,734
And1: 2,655
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Avidly reading WillPenney.com
Contact:

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#42 » by BrooklynBulls » Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:56 am

farzi wrote:Cmon Brooklyn, that's uncalled for.


Seriously? Did you pay no attention to the tenor of my post? I said the report isn't to be believed in the first place. The Portland joke was just made...to bother YOU.
User avatar
andyhop
Analyst
Posts: 3,628
And1: 1,320
Joined: May 08, 2007
   

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#43 » by andyhop » Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:55 am

Maybe I am just overly suspicious but:

KP needs a home run trade by the time the draft is over to save his job.
Nothing looks like working out for him at the moment.
Batum is probably their best Talent/Potential/Cost trade piece.
Ford comes out with a rumor that nobody anywhere else seems to have heard pimping up Batum's value.

Coincidence?
"Football is not a matter of life and death...it's much more important than that."- Bill Shankley
Tirion
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,752
And1: 290
Joined: Oct 27, 2005

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#44 » by Tirion » Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:14 am

Houston traded Gay for Battier and it didn't turn out well for them value-wise.
Tirion
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,752
And1: 290
Joined: Oct 27, 2005

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#45 » by Tirion » Wed Jun 23, 2010 11:41 am

farzi wrote:Cmon Brooklyn, that's uncalled for.

From Portland's PoV, if they accepted this trade, there's some big issues. If we had the number 4, and Johnson was our guy, we have a 50% chance of getting him in the first place. Then, say you do get him, you have whatever chance that he's better than Batum, and whatever chance that he's worse than Batum, plus the time it takes for him to develop into whatever it is he'll become cutting in to the fact that Roy is about to be entering his prime.

Then say he's not available, and you take Cousins. Now you're faced with a center position of Camby, Oden, Cousins, and maybe/possibly Przybilla. Would mean they'd need to take a PR hit and trade Oden while his value is low, piss of a recently resigned Camby, making it also seem like your team isn't loyal at all (see Wade saying the Bulls aren't loyal as a reason he won't go there, and Portland already has a hard time finding free agents), and then you still have to hope that he develops quickly so that you're not taking steps back while the other Western teams are getting better.

You weigh all of those risks against Batum's upside / chemistry and it's not hard to see why they turned it down. I'm not saying it's bad value, or that Batum is worth more. Not at all. I'm saying it's not the right timing. If it were a top 2 pick, obviously it'd be over paying and be a slam dunk for the Blazers.

That being said, I absolutely understand Minny not wanting to do the deal either. 2 years off his rookie contract doesn't matter to the Blazers who are already over the cap and have a rich owner. It would matter to a team who actually has capspace that they'll need in order to continue their rebuilding, plus the fact that they could really use Cousins as they don't have a center, or Johnson since they don't already have Batum.


If Wes in not available at #4, then either Favors/Cousins or Turner/Cousins or (gasp!) Favors/Turner are there for the taking. #4 > Batum value-wise. If you don't like the players available, you can always trade the pick.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,898
And1: 1,070
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#46 » by Dewey » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:12 pm

this batum thing makes no sense ... why burn a pick on a role player when Johnson may be there (amongst many other prospects that appear better already?

Star Tribune
"Scottie Pippen," Johnson said of the former Chicago Bulls star who won just as many NBA titles as Michael Jordan (six). "I grew up loving Scottie Pippen. Everybody loved Mike. I loved Mike, but Scottie was a player I looked like and saw myself being like."
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#47 » by farzi » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:53 pm

Haha Batum said almost the exact same thing, that's kind of funny. MJ also compared Nic to Pip which is neat.
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 59,292
And1: 19,304
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#48 » by shrink » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:58 pm

.. cementing him on the list of the top 250 players that have been compared to Scottie Pippen.
User avatar
farzi
RealGM
Posts: 12,485
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 20, 2007

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#49 » by farzi » Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:00 pm

Any SF with slightly above average defense has been. I've seen Rudy Gay get compared on the PC board
Thank you for all the memories BRoy. You were a class act and brought hope to an entire region for 5 years. You will be missed.
Tirion
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,752
And1: 290
Joined: Oct 27, 2005

Re: FORD; POR turns down #4 for Batum? 

Post#50 » by Tirion » Wed Jun 23, 2010 1:02 pm

Comparisions to Pippen are ludicrous in both cases anyway. Scottie had elite handles. Those two would be happy with average.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves