ImageImageImage

Post Your Jefferson Proposal Thread

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#41 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:30 am

Krapinsky wrote:
Esohny wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Yes, if you don't count the Wolves trading up.

5 = Cousins
6 = big man - Monroe
7 = big man - Davis
8 = Aminu
9 = Henry, Babbit > George
10 = Possibly


How do you have Babbit on the same tier as Henry and George?


I don't, but that's been the word out of Utah for a long time.

Utah loves them some white guys. Just like when they took Derron over Cp3, :lol: joking of course..
User avatar
Rob Rowell
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,939
And1: 101
Joined: May 31, 2009
 

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#42 » by Rob Rowell » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:33 am

I dont get how there is a new rumor comming out of Minny like every 2 weeks. Does your FO not know how to keep they're ideas to themselves or are they leaking all these proposed trades for some reason I cant image all of these are just made up by the media.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#43 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:34 am

4ho5ive wrote:Think he is saying that hoping your guy falls to a certain pick, no matter how likely/unlikely without attempting to actually get your guy is something McHale would do.


I understand that. But that doesn't mean you should trade your best player for a raw deal either.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,771
And1: 22,352
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#44 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:35 am

Rob Rowell wrote:I dont get how there is a new rumor comming out of Minny like every 2 weeks. Does your FO not know how to keep they're ideas to themselves or are they leaking all these proposed trades for some reason I cant image all of these are just made up by the media.


Just because a rumor involves Minnesota doesn't mean the rumor originated here...
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#45 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:44 am

Rob Rowell wrote:I dont get how there is a new rumor comming out of Minny like every 2 weeks. Does your FO not know how to keep they're ideas to themselves or are they leaking all these proposed trades for some reason I cant image all of these are just made up by the media.

Every 2 weeks? more like 2 hours..Its draft time so rumors are flying everywhere, plus Kahn is calling everyone about anyone to get the best deal.Stuff is bound to leak.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#46 » by Krapinsky » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:46 am

OKC gets the #10 from Indiana for Maynor, 18, 21

MN trade Jefferson for Jeff Green, 10, and Collison

That's the hopeful version. Replace Green with Krstic for the pessimistic version.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#47 » by horaceworthy » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:51 am

Is the OKC/Indy trade official or still just smoke? I think it's a nice deal for Indy.

I wouldn't mind Jefferson for #10 and expirings if the other option is dealing Jefferson and pick for expirings + #7. Even though it would suck to watch him tear us up 4 times a year.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
User avatar
TrentTuckerForever
Starter
Posts: 2,100
And1: 2
Joined: Aug 23, 2001
Location: St. Paul

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#48 » by TrentTuckerForever » Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:56 am

horaceworthy wrote:Is the OKC/Indy trade official or still just smoke? I think it's a nice deal for Indy.

I wouldn't mind Jefferson for #10 and expirings if the other option is dealing Jefferson and pick for expirings + #7. Even though it would suck to watch him tear us up 4 times a year.


I honestly think they'll trade him to a team in the East for that very reason. Detroit is my favorite right now - if they like George, go get him. Prince is a nice veteran to have for a season too.
Klomp wrote:Didn't Brad Miller back up Vlade Divac in SAC too?
User avatar
horaceworthy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,650
And1: 250
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Location: Ruining Fuddrucker's for everyone

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#49 » by horaceworthy » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:03 am

In division shouldn't really matter that much. It's not ideal, but it wouldn't be worth throwing in two picks for.
"A while back,'' Cardinal said, "I took a picture of the standings and texted it to Love, just to bust his chops,'' Cardinal said. "He sent me a picture back of a snowdrift.''
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#50 » by skorff26 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:13 am

I'll throw out a few options for Jefferson out east

something like 15 + Redd for Jefferson, Gomes, Hollins

a jefferson for G. Wallace swap makes sense; include nazr and hollins for salary reasons (same with Jefferson for Iggy which has been discussed plenty)
moss_is_1
RealGM
Posts: 10,971
And1: 2,385
Joined: May 20, 2009
   

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#51 » by moss_is_1 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:16 am

Ew to the Redd and 15 option.
skorff26
Analyst
Posts: 3,000
And1: 17
Joined: Dec 05, 2006

Re: Jefferson Proposal Thread 

Post#52 » by skorff26 » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:19 am

moss_is_1 wrote:Ew to the Redd and 15 option.

Redd is on his final year next year, and his contract might be injury insured which could be very attractive for the wolves (or for someone else).

Plus we could definitely package the 15 and 16 to move up.

I'm not a fan of this trade (or any of the current Jefferson trades, if his value is this low then we should keep him) but I think it is fairly comparable to most of the other offers out there.
User avatar
Space Jam
Sophomore
Posts: 198
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 23, 2010

Josh Smith / Al Jefferson Trade 

Post#53 » by Space Jam » Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:30 am

I'm a Hawks fan and been hearing about the T-Wolves trying to get rid of Jefferson and wondering if you all would like this trade.

Hawks send
Josh Smith, Mo Evans, and 2nd round pick

T-Wolves send
Jefferson and late first rounder


Yes-No-Possibly-Hell No? As a Hawks fan I'd like it. Smith would thrive with a actuall good young PG in Flynn running the court, Smith finished 2nd in the defensive player of the year voting as well. Dynamite dunker and keeps fans on there feet, however he can be lazy at times and is stubborn. But when Rubio gets in the NBA and you have Rubio passing to Smith...It would get crazy.
minnisisky
Freshman
Posts: 65
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2010

Re: Josh Smith / Al Jefferson Trade 

Post#54 » by minnisisky » Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:32 am

Depending on who we draft at 4 i would do it.
change
Senior
Posts: 573
And1: 2
Joined: Feb 10, 2002

Re: Josh Smith / Al Jefferson Trade 

Post#55 » by change » Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:44 am

sounds good to me

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves