Just for Kicks and Giggles (Rubio/Turner/Knicks)

Krapinsky · Post #1 » by **Krapinsky** » Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:39 pm

Rubio + Brewer + Brackins to Knicks

Gallo + Randolph + Koufos to Philadelphia

Evan Tuner to MN

What say you?

Wingman · Post #2 » by **Wingman** » Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:45 pm

I'd really consider it. I'm not about to judge Turner on a poor preseason. Comes down to if Rubio wants to play here. I think he will play here, but I could see him bolting.

lobishome · Post #3 » by **lobishome** » Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:03 pm

good advice : don't do the donkey, don't trade Rubio.

laker · Post #4 » by **laker** » Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:51 pm

kapono starts over him soo... nah i think we are good

urinesane · Post #5 » by **urinesane** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:35 am

I wouldn't even do Rubio for Turner.

shrink · Post #6 » by **shrink** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:50 am

I'd take Turner, and rehabilitate Flynn.

Steve_Holiday · Post #7 » by **Steve_Holiday** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:23 am

We need a star.

In my opinion, Rubio has a greater chance of becoming one than Turner.

Foye · Post #8 » by **Foye** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:10 am

I would do it without looking back. :dontknow:

shangrila · Post #9 » by **shangrila** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 11:29 am

As long as it's just for kicks and gigs, I'm cool with it

Dewey · Post #10 » by **Dewey** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:04 pm

kicks and giggles ... what is this, the WNBA?

Foye · Post #11 » by **Foye** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 1:11 pm

Dewey wrote:kicks and giggles ... what is this, the WNBA?

No, the WNBDL. :wave:

Post #12 » by **revprodeji** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 2:38 pm

Winter Wonder · Post #13 » by **Winter Wonder** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 3:13 pm

No interest here, especially at that price.

Krapinsky · Post #14 » by **Krapinsky** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:34 pm

Can we agree that it's basically a Rubio for Turner swap? I think 90% would have done that on draft day. Both players have struggled a bit since then. So why no interest now?

Post #15 » by **C.lupus** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:01 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Can we agree that it's basically a Rubio for Turner swap? I think 90% would have done that on draft day. Both players have struggled a bit since then. So why no interest now?

Our wing depth is much greater and Turner hasn't very looked good so far?

I think I'd have to see Flynn in action and feel very comfortable that he is capable of being our long-term answer at PG before pulling the trigger on this.

Esohny · Post #16 » by **Esohny** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:03 pm

Krapinsky wrote:Can we agree that it's basically a Rubio for Turner swap? I think 90% would have done that on draft day. Both players have struggled a bit since then. So why no interest now?

You think the % would be that high?

cpfsf · Post #17 » by **cpfsf** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:14 pm

Esohny wrote:
Krapinsky wrote:Can we agree that it's basically a Rubio for Turner swap? I think 90% would have done that on draft day. Both players have struggled a bit since then. So why no interest now?

You think the % would be that high?

I'm mixed with a straight up Turner for Rubio swap.

In regards to the trade, I have a small fear that NYK might flip Rubio for Carmelo.

Post #18 » by **revprodeji** » Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:14 pm

I was willing to talk about it on draft day. I am not sure I would have pulled the trigger, but it was worth entertaining.

I think "system" has a big thing to do with it. We could debate that Turner is the perfect fit for this system, where as Rubio will need some adapting.