Smith for Love Trade Rumour
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
- Mattya
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,446
- And1: 7,757
- Joined: Aug 08, 2008
-
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
I like it. This team is the league leader in rebounds, so even the loss of Love wouldn't have much effect. Defensively, we take a big step forward.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
- GDG
- Freshman
- Posts: 77
- And1: 0
- Joined: Jul 04, 2010
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
Although make-believe lineups including Iggy or Smoove (or both) might be lacking in offensive output, I'd always rather "err on the side of defense" so to speak.
A rotation including Smith, Iggy, Wes J, Flynn, Webster, Darko, Tolliver, Rubio, Pekovic etc. sounds like a fantastic explosive blend of defense, strength, and athletic freakishness... *drool*
By my estimation, that would leave some combination of Beasley, Love, Ellington, Brewer, and picks/cap space as trading currency to make that lineup happen... is that enough?
A rotation including Smith, Iggy, Wes J, Flynn, Webster, Darko, Tolliver, Rubio, Pekovic etc. sounds like a fantastic explosive blend of defense, strength, and athletic freakishness... *drool*
By my estimation, that would leave some combination of Beasley, Love, Ellington, Brewer, and picks/cap space as trading currency to make that lineup happen... is that enough?
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,511
- And1: 6,584
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
funkatron101 wrote:C.lupus wrote:Looks great except Philly laughs it off the table.
agreed.
Yeah I know it's...optimistic, but it was just a bit of fun.
With the trade, I'm on the fence along with most of you. While Smith would upgrade the interior defence a hell of a lot and bring more experience and highlights it would be tough to replace Love's rebounding and floor spacing. Still, I'd probably do it, if to just have someone that fit in more with the up and down style the team wants to run.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
- Beas
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 856
- And1: 11
- Joined: Oct 17, 2010
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
Interesting... I think I would do this trade, Smith fits our play style well and he's definitely an improvement on defense from Love and he's very athletic of course. The thing I would be worried about is I'm not sure if he would get quite as many rebounds as Love could but it would be pretty close I would think, also I feel this team benefits a lot from the spacing Love brings too. Its a tough call, but I wouldn't mind if it happened.
Massimo wrote:There is a saying in German that if somebody wants to rape you off and you can't runaway, simply try to have fun with it. This is exactly what the players have to do. Just enjoy it.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
- eyeteeth
- Starter
- Posts: 2,109
- And1: 147
- Joined: Jul 17, 2010
- Location: somewhere on the Front Range
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
Hmmmm.
Hhhhhmmmmmmm.
That would be odd.
I can't quite...
No...
Hhmmm.
Hhhhhmmmmmmm.
That would be odd.
I can't quite...
No...
Hhmmm.

Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
I think Smith is definately a 4. I don't think he can be a 3 in our offense. Maybe a Favors-Love swap would be a better/cheaper idea? We could still move Beasley to the 4 and play Favors at the 5.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
I'm 100% behind this one. Love isn't in Smith's class as a player.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,041
- And1: 14
- Joined: Oct 08, 2007
- Location: North Dakota
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
I'd be down with it too. Smith has clashed with coaches before too, but as far as player, Smith is definitely complete.
20/8/6/2/5 with 0 Turnovers. I'm pretty sure he's averaging 5 blocks a game so far lol. Obviously go down, but impressive nonetheless.
20/8/6/2/5 with 0 Turnovers. I'm pretty sure he's averaging 5 blocks a game so far lol. Obviously go down, but impressive nonetheless.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,511
- And1: 6,584
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
I think Love is looking better for a trade as each game goes on. His stats are so hollow it isn't funny at this point.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
- NoelTheMole
- Sophomore
- Posts: 189
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
I'd be thrilled if this trade went through. Our defense would get severely upgraded. And even though Darko is horrible on offense this season he is still getting lots of blocks. The two of them together would be very good.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- Forum Mod - Timberwolves
- Posts: 50,235
- And1: 17,158
- Joined: Mar 29, 2006
-
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
Two weeks ago he was the franchise. Now people want him gone. 

When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,774
- And1: 22,358
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
Calinks wrote:Two weeks ago he was the franchise. Now people want him gone.
He was NEVER "The Franchise." Do not insult Kevin Garnett like that.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,511
- And1: 6,584
- Joined: Dec 21, 2009
- Location: Land of Aus
-
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
Yeah, the talking heads went overboard with calling him the franchise. He's not even the best player on this team anymore.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 3,196
- And1: 14
- Joined: Jun 02, 2010
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
If you can pull this off, do it and dont look back!
I cant believe Smith is only 24. Guy's a vet already.
I cant believe Smith is only 24. Guy's a vet already.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 25
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 25, 2010
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
Klomp wrote:Calinks wrote:Two weeks ago he was the franchise. Now people want him gone.
He was NEVER "The Franchise." Do not insult Kevin Garnett like that.
With due respect to you Klomp, Kevin could use use an insult or 2 his way.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,048
- And1: 102
- Joined: Feb 17, 2006
- Location: St. Paul
-
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
This trade would be amazing. Too bad Atlanta isn't struggling. Rubio/Johnson/Smith/Beasley would be ridiculous.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
- NoelTheMole
- Sophomore
- Posts: 189
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 17, 2010
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
Do this trade, right now. Give them a draft pick too. I don't care. We need elite defenders on this team, and Josh Smith is one of the most athletic ones in the league.
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,536
- And1: 57
- Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Re: Smith for Love Trade Rumour
I'd do this.
Don't forget smiths 15% kicker. Think he's still a 4 here. Leave beasly at the 3 imo.
Don't forget smiths 15% kicker. Think he's still a 4 here. Leave beasly at the 3 imo.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves