Worm Guts wrote:Krapinsky wrote:Worm Guts wrote:
Whether he's elite or not, you can't assume you can just get him for fair value.
It's too early to say what's fair value for him. He might not even put his name in the hat b/c of the lockout. Just a nonsensical notion to be thinking about trading our players for college players right now.
In the case of Flynn, I don't think so. If we think Rubio's coming we've got too many point guards, and it's not as if we've seen Jonny set the world on fire.
If we can get great value for him we have to consider it.
That much is obvious. I guess I'm not arguing against this exact trade per say, because Sacramento would never do it, but I'm arguing against a more realistic version, say minimum top 3 protection. I don't mean to be changing the rules as we go, but that's more of what my mindset is in defending all these Flynn trades.
I don't think we'll lose much just by waiting to see for ourselves which one is better (Rubio or Flynn) and then trading the other. If an unprotected first from a bottom dweller comes along that's a different story, I guess, but I'm too confident hinging our hopes on Rubio at this point. Too many questions with Rubio for me to feel comfortable trading a player like Flynn with a lot of upside. Does Rubio even come over next year? Will he be as good as we expect him to be? When he comes over will he be happy or hate it here?