Klomp wrote:GDG wrote:I think many people are operating under the assumption (due to speculation that Philly wants cap relief) that we would be able to pry Iggy away using a deal centered around our cap space.
Just because a team wants salary relief doesn't mean they are willing to absolutely get killed value-wise in a trade.
Right. I agree. But they may be willing to deal for prospects, picks, and cap space... basically an Al Jefferson type of deal. To them, that may not be "getting killed" value-wise.
It almost appears as if they tried to move Brand's contract over the summer for relief and failed. Realizing there is no market for that monster contract, maybe they've moved on to trying to move out Iggy's contract. Who knows for sure.
Klomp wrote:Also, Philadelphia traded expiring contract Sam Dalembert for Andres Nocioni's 3 year, 21 million deal this offseason, which makes me believe salary relief isn't all that important to them.
Good point. Maybe they just thought Nocioni was really really good? Or maybe Stefanski is just delusional... all the better for us.
When you factor in their poor record, Turner's struggles, etc., it really depends on what direction the 76ers try to go. If they go in a direction that involves moving Iggy for cap space, prospects, and/or picks, then I would hope that Kahn would inquire about the situation.