ImageImageImage

Defense

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Defense 

Post#1 » by C.lupus » Tue Mar 8, 2011 5:11 pm

Let's talk about what passes for defense with the Timberwolves. It is an abomination, we all know that. I'm curious what or who you all feel is the root cause.

Kevin Love, Michael Beasley, Luke Ridnour, Jonny Flynn are all poor defenders. Kurt Rambis' defensive scheme looks terrible with guys just standing around in no man's land. Are Rambis' schemes just bad? Is Rambis trying to adjust his defense to cover for his poor defenders at most positions? Are players like Love worse defenders because of Rambis? Is it something else? It's probably a chicken-egg debate but I'm curious to hear other takes because, frankly, I don't know.

What say you?
TDWOLVESFAN
Sophomore
Posts: 180
And1: 1
Joined: Aug 08, 2008

Re: Defense 

Post#2 » by TDWOLVESFAN » Tue Mar 8, 2011 5:40 pm

Yes Rambis' defensive scheme is lame and its flaws are more glaring with the players he is trying to use it with. Everyone who is not on the ball has one foot in the paint or near the paint leaving the passing lanes. Then we have to scramble to close out on the 3 pt shooters. Most of our players are not quick enough to cover that much ground that quickly and others don't even recognize or see the play developing so they don't react at all so they are standing in no man's land.

We also have a number of players who do not take an interest in playing good defense or maybe just can not stay focused on their defensive assignments.

AGAIN - as many of us have said before we need to hire a coach or assistant coach that can teach defensive techniques and schemes before next season.
I've been a fan since the beginning and I will be until my end.
User avatar
collin_k41
Analyst
Posts: 3,470
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 12, 2006

Re: Defense 

Post#3 » by collin_k41 » Tue Mar 8, 2011 5:56 pm

It's a combination of things. We have a few poor defenders but I don't think our defensive schemes help at all. You'd think as a coach you'd try to take the defensive approach that allows your players to maximize their abilities, or lack thereof but I don't think that's happening. There are times where I think we play actually decent defense though, so a lot of it might be effort related. I mean, it's been the same old story all season for the Wolves, I can't blame them much for lowering their defensive intensity at this point in the year. These guys have been going at it all year with not much to show for it. I wish, for their sakes, that they could see team improvement. Anyways, here's my list of reasons for poor defense in descending order:

1. Lack of effort, effort is the bottom line in defense. You can have all the skills in the world but if you don't put in effort on the defensive end you're going to stink at it. Plain and simple.
2. Rambis' schemes
3. Poor defenders. Luke is out-muscled by bigger PG's, Jonny doesn't try, Beas isn't quick enough to guard the quicker SF's, Love lacks size and athleticism, etc.
GeorgiaWolf
Sophomore
Posts: 184
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 08, 2008
Location: Backwoods by my TV
     

Re: Defense 

Post#4 » by GeorgiaWolf » Tue Mar 8, 2011 6:01 pm

I think all of Rambis' coaching evolves around a system that he developed/learned while with tthe Lakers and it worked for them. What doesn't work is this system with this group of players. A good coach would adjust but Rambis keeps throwing the same stuff against the wall an d nothing really sticks...
Piecake
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,885
And1: 264
Joined: Nov 13, 2010

Re: Defense 

Post#5 » by Piecake » Tue Mar 8, 2011 7:42 pm

GeorgiaWolf wrote:I think all of Rambis' coaching evolves around a system that he developed/learned while with tthe Lakers and it worked for them. What doesn't work is this system with this group of players. A good coach would adjust but Rambis keeps throwing the same stuff against the wall an d nothing really sticks...


I dont know, I think the offense definitely has adapted to the players more this year. We are using a lot more pick and role, because that is simply what Love and our PGs are very good at. Maybe next year he adapts the defensive scheme.

There are games where we have played good defense. The problem is is that those are few and far between. I dont know what that really means though. Is our effort just not there and the vast majority of nights? Or is it a problem with our crappy defenders and scheme that they have to put a supreme amount of effort to make the defense passable?
B Calrissian
Head Coach
Posts: 6,928
And1: 17
Joined: Sep 22, 2007

Re: Defense 

Post#6 » by B Calrissian » Tue Mar 8, 2011 8:45 pm

It's a combo of players and Rambis. With bad perimeter defenders and Rambis having them pack the paint it's a wonder we win any games.

I've criticized Love in the past about being a lazy sob on defense but this year he seems to be trying.

On the whole roster who is even considered an average defender? Webster, Tolliver, and Darko?
funkatron101
General Manager
Posts: 7,741
And1: 1,177
Joined: Jan 02, 2008
Location: St. Paul

Re: Defense 

Post#7 » by funkatron101 » Tue Mar 8, 2011 8:57 pm

We see the same "mistakes" over and over again. I don't think it's really on the players.

It's hard for us to really say though, unless we actually see them in practice.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
C.lupus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 30,827
And1: 8,857
Joined: Nov 02, 2007

Re: Defense 

Post#8 » by C.lupus » Tue Mar 8, 2011 9:07 pm

The scientist in me wants to see the controlled experiment putting good defenders into Rambis' system and putting a proven defensive coach on this team. Watching Love sag off his man to stay by the basket (thus getting better rebounding opportunities) it just makes me wonder how much is player and how much is coach. Love's lack of lateral quickness would certainly make a coach come up with a scheme that has him sag so he doesn't get burned on the perimeter so that kind of makes sense. On the other hand, they all seem to do that, too and it's obvious that it doesn't work so there probably is more to it.

If it is a lack of effort, then Rambis really needs to take a different approach to his "teaching" because his method obviously isn't working.

IDK, I'm rambling. I would just like to see what this system is supposed to look like...
LordBaldric
General Manager
Posts: 7,611
And1: 1,970
Joined: Jul 14, 2006

Re: Defense 

Post#9 » by LordBaldric » Tue Mar 8, 2011 9:41 pm

Some guy on Canis who was allowed to attend practice before the Lakers game said Rambis specifically instructed them to sag off the Laker bigs on the perimiter. Toliver asked "even Lamar Odom?" and Rambis said yes. It's like the guy isn't aware that a 3 point shot exists.

What I would give to switch him for Tom Thibideau. He has totally transformed the Bulls into a defensive beast using essentially the same players they had last year.
Cyborg21
General Manager
Posts: 8,583
And1: 368
Joined: Apr 14, 2005
Location: Broken Arrow, OK
Contact:
       

Re: Defense 

Post#10 » by Cyborg21 » Tue Mar 8, 2011 9:51 pm

Defense you say? DEFENSE!? WHERE!? It requires too much effort and doesn't look cool.
Image
User avatar
john2jer
RealGM
Posts: 15,304
And1: 452
Joined: May 26, 2006
Location: State Of Total Awesomeness
 

Re: Defense 

Post#11 » by john2jer » Tue Mar 8, 2011 10:26 pm

Kurt Rambis is essentially a JV coach. He's teaching a system, no matter the players, with the mindset that this it's what the Varsity coach runs, and he's preparing those players to be ready if they ever actually get Varsity minutes. Most likely it will be in a blowout.
basketball royalty wrote:Is Miami considered a big city in the States? I thought guys just went there because of the weather and the bitches?
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Defense 

Post#12 » by Krapinsky » Wed Mar 9, 2011 12:03 am

Well we have a roster that contains arguably the three worst defenders in the league at their respective position -- Love, Beasley, Flynn. Hard to be a good defensive team with those guys getting heavy rotational minutes.

Beasley and Flynn need to go in my opinion. Move Johnson and Webster to SF. Find a SG that can play some D.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Devilzsidewalk
RealGM
Posts: 32,004
And1: 6,020
Joined: Oct 09, 2005

Re: Defense 

Post#13 » by Devilzsidewalk » Wed Mar 9, 2011 3:58 am

too much helping in the paint, I'd rather take my chances off the dribble than the broken record of getting crushed on threes
Image
User avatar
AQuintus
RealGM
Posts: 10,425
And1: 2,458
Joined: Jan 10, 2008
Location: But let me speak for the weak, I mean the rookies
   

Re: Defense 

Post#14 » by AQuintus » Wed Mar 9, 2011 5:17 am

At this point I would say that it's 20% players and 80% scheme/coaching. Just look at Chicago and New Orleans.

Last year under Vinny Del Negro, the Bulls were 13th in the league with 99.1 OPPG, this year under Thibodeau and with arguably a worse defensive team (Brad Miller switched with Boozer and losing Hinrich), they're 1st with 91.5 OPPG.

The Hornets were 21st in the league (102.7 OPPG) under Bower, and now they're 3rd (92.5) under Monty Williams. Obviously coaching matters a lot on defense.

With that said, I think that we could be a good, above average defensive team with the right coaching, but not a great defensive team due to personnel.

Edit: split it up a little to make it more readable
Image

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves