Pacers @ Wolves
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- Starter
- Posts: 2,048
- And1: 102
- Joined: Feb 17, 2006
- Location: St. Paul
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
The Beasley hate is ridiculous. You'll all be back on the bandwagon, believe that.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 25,067
- And1: 3,618
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Krapinsky wrote:abrewbro68 wrote:
I must say, that was one of the better defensive efforts last night from Mike. I know all of the Pacers struggled, but he (and the rest of the team) did a very good job on Granger
If you looked at the boxscore only that's what you would think, but Beasley really had little to do with it.
Granger had a lot of uncontested looks that just didn't drop. Even layups.

Beasley is really banged up right now. Needs some time to rest. He'll be back really strong next season.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Wingman wrote:The Beasley hate is ridiculous. You'll all be back on the bandwagon, believe that.
Hopefully before he falls off the wagon.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
- abrewbro68
- Sophomore
- Posts: 226
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
I watched the game last night, and the main uncontested shots Granger had were from two feet outside of the 3 point line. Don't know how you can critize a team or a player that forced the other teams best player to go 2/19. Can't tell me all 17 misses we just uncontested misses
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,782
- And1: 22,367
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
breatnach wrote:Are you planning to update this every game for the next 2,5 years until he's got Wilt's record?
I didn't make it, so no.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,782
- And1: 22,367
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Worm Guts wrote:Klomp wrote:Al Jefferson-led Wolves - 15 wins in 82 games
Kevin Love-led Wolves - 16 wins in 66 games
As much as I like Love better than Jefferson, Love was on the 15 win team too. It's not close to a fair comparison.
Which shows how much more Kevin has done this year with less talent around him.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,782
- And1: 22,367
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Vindicater wrote:^^^ that came out like a shot at Love which it was not
Was it a shot at Rambis?

tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
- Krapinsky
- RealGM
- Posts: 20,712
- And1: 1,952
- Joined: May 13, 2007
- Location: Los Angeles
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Klomp wrote:Worm Guts wrote:Klomp wrote:Al Jefferson-led Wolves - 15 wins in 82 games
Kevin Love-led Wolves - 16 wins in 66 games
As much as I like Love better than Jefferson, Love was on the 15 win team too. It's not close to a fair comparison.
Which shows how much more Kevin has done this year with less talent around him.
You think we have less talent this year?
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.
NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
- Grits n Gravy
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,626
- And1: 1,804
- Joined: Feb 22, 2010
- Location: New Zealand
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
abrewbro68 wrote:I watched the game last night, and the main uncontested shots Granger had were from two feet outside of the 3 point line. Don't know how you can critize a team or a player that forced the other teams best player to go 2/19. Can't tell me all 17 misses we just uncontested misses
om what i saw in the second half 90% of them were good looks that he'd normally shoot and make, he missed a fricken wide open dunk
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
- abrewbro68
- Sophomore
- Posts: 226
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Well I guess it's just the eye of the beholder I guess. Granger had only 5 shot attempts from inside the paint. he was forced or just chose to continue to shot jumpers
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,741
- And1: 1,177
- Joined: Jan 02, 2008
- Location: St. Paul
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Klomp wrote:Worm Guts wrote:Klomp wrote:Al Jefferson-led Wolves - 15 wins in 82 games
Kevin Love-led Wolves - 16 wins in 66 games
As much as I like Love better than Jefferson, Love was on the 15 win team too. It's not close to a fair comparison.
Which shows how much more Kevin has done this year with less talent around him.
No way. Al doesn't make up for Pavs, Jawaii, Stewie, Wilkins.
It's arguable that Al and Beasley are a wash in terms of "talent"
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
- abrewbro68
- Sophomore
- Posts: 226
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Which shows how much more Kevin has done this year with less talent around him.[/quote]
You think we have less talent this year?[/quote]
Yeah I don't know how you can say we have less talent than last year. Even with Love getting his 20, the offense isn't even run trough him.
You think we have less talent this year?[/quote]
Yeah I don't know how you can say we have less talent than last year. Even with Love getting his 20, the offense isn't even run trough him.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,782
- And1: 22,367
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Sorry I'm not sure what I was thinking. I was trying to compare Kevin's teammates last year to his this year, when I should've compared Kevin's this year to Al's last year.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,741
- And1: 1,177
- Joined: Jan 02, 2008
- Location: St. Paul
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Klomp wrote:Sorry I'm not sure what I was thinking. I was trying to compare Kevin's teammates last year to his this year, when I should've compared Kevin's this year to Al's last year.
You don't need to do that. It was basically:
Last year-Love, Al, rancid garbage.
This year- Love, Beasley, umm, a pile of potpourri. It still stinks, but not nearly as bad.
Instead of the vomit inducing team last year, we just get a mild headache.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
- Esohny
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,613
- And1: 339
- Joined: Apr 18, 2009
- Location: Saint Paul
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
funkatron101 wrote:Klomp wrote:Sorry I'm not sure what I was thinking. I was trying to compare Kevin's teammates last year to his this year, when I should've compared Kevin's this year to Al's last year.
You don't need to do that. It was basically:
Last year-Love, Al, rancid garbage.
This year- Love, Beasley, umm, a pile of potpourri. It still stinks, but not nearly as bad.
Instead of the vomit inducing team last year, we just get a mild headache.
Well, the headache is often more migraine-like than mild.
SMAC-K wrote:Mayo>>>>Love and that 5th pick
OJ Mayo is one of the best defenders in the league, hes a two way player and hes a great passer and playmaker.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 2,742
- And1: 27
- Joined: Dec 06, 2009
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
With a case of diarrhea.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,741
- And1: 1,177
- Joined: Jan 02, 2008
- Location: St. Paul
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
allweneedisLOVE wrote:With a case of diarrhea.
That's the Rambis factor.
Lattimer wrote:Cracks me up that people still think that Wiggins will be involved in the trade for Love. Wolves are out of their mind if they think they are getting Wiggins for Love.
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
- Foye
- Club Captain- German Soccer
- Posts: 25,067
- And1: 3,618
- Joined: Jul 29, 2008
- Location: Frankfurt
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Esohny wrote:funkatron101 wrote:Klomp wrote:Sorry I'm not sure what I was thinking. I was trying to compare Kevin's teammates last year to his this year, when I should've compared Kevin's this year to Al's last year.
You don't need to do that. It was basically:
Last year-Love, Al, rancid garbage.
This year- Love, Beasley, umm, a pile of potpourri. It still stinks, but not nearly as bad.
Instead of the vomit inducing team last year, we just get a mild headache.
Well, the headache is often more migraine-like than mild.
Not to mention it's chronic.

Re: Pacers @ Wolves
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 68,782
- And1: 22,367
- Joined: Jul 08, 2005
- Contact:
-
Re: Pacers @ Wolves
Favorite part at 2:34
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1j_hYDQiPs[/youtube]
"They're funny."
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D1j_hYDQiPs[/youtube]
"They're funny."
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves