Hypothetical froncourt situation.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
Hypothetical froncourt situation.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Hypothetical froncourt situation.
Lets say our FO decides that the Love/Pek combo is not going to works long term due to lack oh defense, length and athleticism. Lets say they have deals on the table like DWill/Pek for Vareajo or Love for Ibaka and assets. Which direction would you prefer?
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,971
- And1: 2,385
- Joined: May 20, 2009
-
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
I'd rather do Love for Ibaka and assets. If the assets include Jeremy Lamb, it's an easy deal for me.
Ibaka is way younger then AV, while being a near perfect fit next to Pek / with Rubio.
Ibaka is way younger then AV, while being a near perfect fit next to Pek / with Rubio.
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,752
- And1: 290
- Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
I'd rather keep Love and PEK, thank you.
Varejao's rebounding is redundant next to Love, he's older than PEK and injury prone. Moreover trading for him now is buying at the highest point, silly from the value-based POV.
Ibaka is a much worse player than Love, so even going there is dumb. That ship has sailed with the Harden trade.
Varejao's rebounding is redundant next to Love, he's older than PEK and injury prone. Moreover trading for him now is buying at the highest point, silly from the value-based POV.
Ibaka is a much worse player than Love, so even going there is dumb. That ship has sailed with the Harden trade.
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
- LaViggins
- Senior
- Posts: 593
- And1: 140
- Joined: Jul 11, 2012
- Location: Target Center
-
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
Tirion wrote:I'd rather keep Love and PEK, thank you.
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,943
- And1: 1,262
- Joined: Dec 20, 2008
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
Twolves_42 wrote:Tirion wrote:I'd rather keep Love and PEK, thank you.
Could you please stay away from posting in the thread if the HYPOTHETICAL trade of either Love or Pek is too much for you to accept.
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
- The J Rocka
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 13,570
- And1: 1,732
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
- Location: Minneapolis
-
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
moss_is_1 wrote:I'd rather do Love for Ibaka and assets. If the assets include Jeremy Lamb, it's an easy deal for me.
Ibaka is way younger then AV, while being a near perfect fit next to Pek / with Rubio.
I would go with this option as well. I'd like the Raptors pick included as well.
Trading Love to a division rival with Westbrook & KD would be a tough pill to swallow.
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
- Varejao17
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,236
- And1: 165
- Joined: Sep 01, 2004
- Location: Manaus-Amazonas-Brasil
-
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
Tirion wrote:I'd rather keep Love and PEK, thank you.
+1

props to C.lupus
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
- jade_hippo
- Starter
- Posts: 2,383
- And1: 135
- Joined: Jan 05, 2009
- Location: Take off... eh!
-
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
I'm with Rocka, I couldn't handle seeing Love/KD/Westbrook. For that reason alone I'd go with Love/AV.
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 59,300
- And1: 19,311
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
Re: Hypothetical froncourt situation.
Pek is not nearly the player that Kevin Love is, on the court, or for marketing purposes. It's too hard for MIN to attract superstars that they can't be trading down in favor of less talented players plus additional assets. But if that's your question, Love >> Pek.
Personally, I'd prefer they keep them both, and find a starter-level PF/C that can play with each.
Personally, I'd prefer they keep them both, and find a starter-level PF/C that can play with each.
Sign5 wrote:Yea not happening, I expected a better retort but what do I expect from realgm(ers) in 2025. Just quote and state things that lack context, then repeat the same thing over and over as if something new and profound was said. Just lol.
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves