ImageImageImage

McDaniels or Vanderbilt?

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

Who is the starting PF of the Future?

Jaden McDaniels
11
46%
Jared Vanderbilt
8
33%
Someone Else
5
21%
 
Total votes: 24

Merc_Porto
General Manager
Posts: 9,941
And1: 3,540
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: McDaniels or Vanderbilt? 

Post#21 » by Merc_Porto » Tue Jan 26, 2021 3:22 pm

We need to adjust.
With Ricky out there, play McDaniels. With Dlo, play Vando.
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,959
And1: 23,219
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: McDaniels or Vanderbilt? 

Post#22 » by Klomp » Tue Jan 26, 2021 4:50 pm

mercgold3 wrote:We need to adjust.
With Ricky out there, play McDaniels. With Dlo, play Vando.

I actually disagree, I think Vanderbilt needs a PG like Rubio in order to maximize his offensive ability. It's similar to how young Rubio maximized so many guys from a flawed Wolves roster at that time.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Merc_Porto
General Manager
Posts: 9,941
And1: 3,540
Joined: Nov 21, 2013
   

Re: McDaniels or Vanderbilt? 

Post#23 » by Merc_Porto » Tue Jan 26, 2021 5:22 pm

Klomp wrote:
mercgold3 wrote:We need to adjust.
With Ricky out there, play McDaniels. With Dlo, play Vando.

I actually disagree, I think Vanderbilt needs a PG like Rubio in order to maximize his offensive ability. It's similar to how young Rubio maximized so many guys from a flawed Wolves roster at that time.


I understand that. But they are both young and we cant have Ricky with Okogie and Vando out there at same time. No shooting at all.
With Dlo shooting ability at least we can balance more the lineups.

Give Ricky capable shooters to have around. That would help him with his shooting ability as well because when the opponents know that we have 3 non shooters out there is easy to defend against us.

Just lock up Beasley and Naz (Meh) and thats it.
User avatar
Krapinsky
RealGM
Posts: 20,712
And1: 1,952
Joined: May 13, 2007
Location: Los Angeles

Re: McDaniels or Vanderbilt? 

Post#24 » by Krapinsky » Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:05 pm

I think McDaniels has a chance to be our starting SF of the future once he fills out and tightens his handle.

Vanderbilt could be a real piece and could potentially be a long term fit at PF next to KAT. Can he develop a respectable 18 footer?

With Rubio, MCLaughlin, Okogie, Beasley, Vanderbilt, Naz, McDaniels, and Ed Davis, you can almost see this team start to form a gritty identity. Edwards even started to buy in last night. Not sure how D-Lo fits into that.
FinnTheHuman wrote: Your post is just garbage.

NewWolvesOrder wrote:Garbage post, indeed.
Dewey
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,926
And1: 1,086
Joined: May 22, 2001

Re: McDaniels or Vanderbilt? 

Post#25 » by Dewey » Tue Jan 26, 2021 9:35 pm

Krapinsky wrote:I think McDaniels has a chance to be our starting SF of the future once he fills out and tightens his handle.

Vanderbilt could be a real piece and could potentially be a long term fit at PF next to KAT. Can he develop a respectable 18 footer?

With Rubio, MCLaughlin, Okogie, Beasley, Vanderbilt, Naz, McDaniels, and Ed Davis, you can almost see this team start to form a gritty identity. Edwards even started to buy in last night. Not sure how D-Lo fits into that.

Agree ... we need to master what we can control without scorers (KAT and DLo) such as loose balls, rebounding, and defense.

Maybe I'm wrong, but we know Ant (like any rookie) needs leadership to help set a precedent of workmanship ... maybe DLo does too :dontknow: At some point this guy has to want to figure it out. He obviously has talent, but he clearly lacks interest or motivation to lead. Maybe I or whoever need to stop thinking he should be more than what he is - I mean, he got the max (Great), but maybe we need to move past the notion that he is anything more than an offensive role player. Just sayin... Might be a direction Ryan needs to consider in order to clean up this rotation.
Flip response to Love wanting out, "He has no reason to be upset, you're either a part of the problem or a part of the solution"
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,959
And1: 23,219
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: McDaniels or Vanderbilt? 

Post#26 » by Klomp » Wed Jan 27, 2021 1:12 am

I think the more important question is if either of them individually is good enough to where the team no longer views upgrading the position as a need? Right now I'd lean no.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Jedzz
RealGM
Posts: 12,322
And1: 2,506
Joined: Oct 05, 2018

Re: McDaniels or Vanderbilt? 

Post#27 » by Jedzz » Wed Jan 27, 2021 1:48 am

sigh

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves